Self-administration of adrenaline for anaphylaxis during in-hospital food challenges improves health-related quality of life

Sarah Burrell, Nandinee Patel, Marta Vazquez-Ortiz, Dianne E Campbell, Audrey DunnGalvin, Paul J Turner, Sarah Burrell, Nandinee Patel, Marta Vazquez-Ortiz, Dianne E Campbell, Audrey DunnGalvin, Paul J Turner

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of anaphylaxis on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and self-efficacy in food-allergic patients undergoing in-hospital food challenge.

Design: Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Specialist allergy centre.

Patients: Peanut-allergic young people aged 8-16 years.

Interventions: Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge to peanut, with HRQL and self-efficacy assessed using validated questionnaire, approximately 2 weeks prior to and 2 weeks after challenge. Where possible, anaphylaxis was treated with self-injected adrenaline (epinephrine).

Main outcome measures: Change in HRQL and self-efficacy.

Results: 56 participants had reactions at food challenge, of whom 16 (29%) had anaphylaxis. Overall, there was an improvement in HRQL (mean 2.6 points (95% CI 0.3 to 4.8); p=0.030) and self-efficacy (mean 4.1 points (95% CI 2.4 to 5.9); p<0.0001), independent of whether anaphylaxis occurred. Parents also reported improved HRQL (mean 10.3 points (95% CI 5.9 to 14.7); p<0.0001). We found evidence of discordance between the improvement in HRQL and self-efficacy as reported by young people and that perceived by parents in their child.

Conclusions: Anaphylaxis at food challenge, followed by self-administration of injected adrenaline, was associated with an increase in HRQL and self-efficacy in young people with peanut allergy. We found no evidence that the occurrence of anaphylaxis had a detrimental effect. Young people should be encouraged to self-administer adrenaline using their autoinjector device to treat anaphylaxis at in-hospital challenge.

Trial registration number: NCT02149719.

Keywords: adolescent health; therapeutics.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: PT has received research funding for studies of food desensitisation from the Medical Research Council, Imperial/NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Jon Moulton Charity Trust and Action Medical Research and has acted a principle investigator for commercial studies of food immunotherapy sponsored by Aimmune Therapeutics and DBV Technologies. DC is an employee of DBV Technologies. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Change in HRQL in the participant (FAQLQ-YP), parent proxy (FAQLQ-P) and the parent themselves following food challenge, overall and by reaction severity. Error bars represent 95% CIs. FAQLQ, Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire; HRQL, health-related quality of life.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in self-efficacy score reported by participants and parent proxy (ie, change in the young person as reported by the parent). Error bars represent 95% CIs.

References

    1. Nwaru BI, Hickstein L, Panesar SS, et al. . Prevalence of common food allergies in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy 2014;69:992–1007. 10.1111/all.12423
    1. Turner PJ, Gowland MH, Sharma V, et al. . Increase in anaphylaxis-related hospitalizations but no increase in fatalities: an analysis of United Kingdom national anaphylaxis data, 1992-2012. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015;135:956–63. 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.10.021
    1. Cummings AJ, Knibb RC, King RM, et al. . The psychosocial impact of food allergy and food hypersensitivity in children, adolescents and their families: a review. Allergy 2010;65:933–45. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02342.x
    1. Sporik R, Hill DJ, Hosking CS. Specificity of allergen skin testing in predicting positive open food challenges to milk, egg and peanut in children. Clin Exp Allergy 2000;30:1541–6. 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00928.x
    1. Osborne NJ, Koplin JJ, Martin PE, et al. . Prevalence of challenge-proven IgE-mediated food allergy using population-based sampling and predetermined challenge criteria in infants. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:668–76. 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.01.039
    1. Nicolaou N, Poorafshar M, Murray C, et al. . Allergy or tolerance in children sensitized to peanut: prevalence and differentiation using component-resolved diagnostics. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;125:191–7. 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.008
    1. Soar J, Pumphrey R, Cant A, et al. . Working group of the resuscitation Council (UK). emergency treatment of anaphylactic reactions-guidelines for healthcare providers. Resuscitation 2008;77:157–69.
    1. Muraro A, Roberts G, Worm M, et al. . Anaphylaxis: guidelines from the European Academy of allergy and clinical immunology. Allergy 2014;69:1026–45. 10.1111/all.12437
    1. Simons FER, Ardusso LR, Bilò MB, et al. . International consensus on (icon) anaphylaxis. World Allergy Organ J 2014;7:9. 10.1186/1939-4551-7-9
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) . Anaphylaxis: assessment and referral after emergency treatment. Clinical guideline [CG134], 2011. Available:
    1. Turner PJ, Jerschow E, Umasunthar T, et al. . Fatal anaphylaxis: mortality rate and risk factors. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2017;5:1169–78. 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.06.031
    1. Ierodiakonou D, Patel N, Chong KW, et al. . Need for more than one dose of adrenaline to treat anaphylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. presented at the European Academy of allergy and clinical immunology Congress June 2020; London, UK.
    1. Noimark L, Wales J, Du Toit G, et al. . The use of adrenaline autoinjectors by children and teenagers. Clin Exp Allergy 2012;42:284–92. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03912.x
    1. Vetander M, Helander D, Flodström C, et al. . Anaphylaxis and reactions to foods in children--a population-based case study of emergency department visits. Clin Exp Allergy 2012;42:568–77. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03954.x
    1. Grabenhenrich LB, Dölle S, Moneret-Vautrin A, et al. . Anaphylaxis in children and adolescents: the European anaphylaxis registry. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016;137:1128–37. 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.11.015
    1. Marrs T, Lack G. Why do few food-allergic adolescents treat anaphylaxis with adrenaline?--Reviewing a pressing issue. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2013;24:222–9. 10.1111/pai.12013
    1. Chong KW, Turner PJ. Food allergy desensitisation: a hard nut to crack? Arch Dis Child 2019;104:1021–2. 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317690
    1. Dunn Galvin A, Lindsley S, Patel N, et al. . Validation of food allergy quality of life short forms (FAQLQ‐10) for parents, children and teens. Allergy 2019;74:95–6.
    1. Sampson HA, Gerth van Wijk R, Bindslev-Jensen C, et al. . Standardizing double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology PRACTALL consensus report. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;130:1260–74. 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.10.017
    1. Knibb RC, Stalker C. Validation of the food allergy quality of Life-Parental burden questionnaire in the UK. Qual Life Res 2013;22:1841–9. 10.1007/s11136-012-0295-3
    1. Greenhawt M, DunnGalvin A. Preliminary psychometric analyses and clinical performance of a caregiver self-efficacy scale for food allergy self-management. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018;120:73–9. 10.1016/j.anai.2017.09.060
    1. DunnGalvin A, Cullinane C, Daly DA, et al. . Longitudinal validity and responsiveness of the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire - Parent Form in children 0-12 years following positive and negative food challenges. Clin Exp Allergy 2010;40:476–85. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2010.03454.x
    1. Soller L, Hourihane J, DunnGalvin A. The impact of oral food challenge tests on food allergy health-related quality of life. Allergy 2014;69:1255–7. 10.1111/all.12442
    1. van der Velde JL, Flokstra-de Blok BMJ, de Groot H, et al. . Food allergy-related quality of life after double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in adults, adolescents, and children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;130:1136–43. 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.05.037
    1. Rasbach L, Jenkins C, Laffel L. An integrative review of self-efficacy measurement instruments in youth with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2015;41:43–58. 10.1177/0145721714550254
    1. Knibb RC, Barnes C, Stalker C. Parental self-efficacy in managing food allergy and mental health predicts food allergy-related quality of life. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2016;27:459–64. 10.1111/pai.12569
    1. Moens A, Grypdonck MH, van der Bijl JJ. The development and psychometric testing of an instrument to measure diabetes management self-efficacy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Sch Inq Nurs Pract 2001;15:223–33.
    1. Yanagida N, Sato S, Asaumi T, et al. . Risk factors for severe reactions during double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2017;172:173–82. 10.1159/000458724
    1. Gupta M, Grossmann LD, Spergel JM, et al. . Egg food challenges are associated with more gastrointestinal reactions. Children 2015;2:371–81. 10.3390/children2030371
    1. Turner PJ, Mehr S, Joshi P, et al. . Safety of food challenges to extensively heated egg in egg-allergic children: a prospective cohort study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2013;24:450–5. 10.1111/pai.12093
    1. Noone S, Ross J, Sampson HA, et al. . Epinephrine use in positive oral food challenges performed as a screening test for food allergy therapy trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2015;3:424–8. 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.10.008
    1. Blumchen K, Beder A, Beschorner J, et al. . Modified oral food challenge used with sensitization biomarkers provides more real-life clinical thresholds for peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;134:390–8. 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.03.035
    1. Shemesh E, D'Urso C, Knight C, et al. . Food-Allergic adolescents at risk for anaphylaxis: a randomized controlled study of supervised injection to improve comfort with epinephrine self-injection. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2017;5:391–7. 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.12.016

Source: PubMed

Подписаться