Efficacy of newer versus older antihypertensive drugs in black patients living in sub-Saharan Africa

J R M'Buyamba-Kabangu, B C Anisiuba, M B Ndiaye, D Lemogoum, L Jacobs, C K Ijoma, L Thijs, H J Boombhi, J Kaptue, P M Kolo, J B Mipinda, C E Osakwe, A Odili, B Ezeala-Adikaibe, S Kingue, B A Omotoso, S A Ba, I I Ulasi, J A Staessen, Newer versus Older Antihypertensive Agents in African Hypertensive Patients Trial (NOAAH) Investigators, J R M'Buyamba-Kabangu, B C Anisiuba, M B Ndiaye, D Lemogoum, L Jacobs, C K Ijoma, L Thijs, H J Boombhi, J Kaptue, P M Kolo, J B Mipinda, C E Osakwe, A Odili, B Ezeala-Adikaibe, S Kingue, B A Omotoso, S A Ba, I I Ulasi, J A Staessen, Newer versus Older Antihypertensive Agents in African Hypertensive Patients Trial (NOAAH) Investigators

Abstract

To address the epidemic of hypertension in blacks born and living in sub-Saharan Africa, we compared in a randomised clinical trial (NCT01030458) single-pill combinations of old and new antihypertensive drugs in patients (30-69 years) with uncomplicated hypertension (140-179/90-109 mm Hg). After ≥4 weeks off treatment, 183 of 294 screened patients were assigned to once daily bisoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide 5/6.25 mg (n=89; R) or amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg (n=94; E) and followed up for 6 months. To control blood pressure (<140/<90 mm Hg), bisoprolol and amlodipine could be doubled (10 mg per day) and α-methyldopa (0.5-2 g per day) added. Sitting blood pressure fell by 19.5/12.0 mm Hg in R patients and by 24.8/13.2 mm Hg in E patients and heart rate decreased by 9.7 beats per minute in R patients with no change in E patients (-0.2 beats per minute). The between-group differences (R minus E) were 5.2 mm Hg (P<0.0001) systolic, 1.3 mm Hg (P=0.12) diastolic, and 9.6 beats per minute (P<0.0001). In 57 R and 67 E patients with data available at all visits, these estimates were 5.5 mm Hg (P<0.0001) systolic, 1.8 mm Hg (P=0.07) diastolic and 9.8 beats per minute (P<0.0001). In R compared with E patients, 45 vs 37% (P=0.13) proceeded to the higher dose of randomised treatment and 33 vs 9% (P<0.0001) had α-methyldopa added. There were no between-group differences in symptoms except for ankle oedema in E patients (P=0.012). In conclusion, new compared with old drugs lowered systolic blood pressure more and therefore controlled hypertension better in native African black patients.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Systolic (a) and diastolic (b) blood pressures and heart rate (c) at randomisation and at various follow-up visits in patients randomised to old drugs (n=89) or new drugs (n=94). Plotted values are means±s.e. The number of patients contributing to the means is given. P-values denote the significance of the between-group differences derived from a mixed model. Significance of the between-group differences at individual visits: *P⩽0.05; †P⩽0.01; ‡P⩽0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier survival function estimates for the probability of reaching blood pressure control in patients randomised to old drugs (n=89) or new drugs (n=94). Control was a blood pressure lower than 140 mm Hg systolic and lower than 90 mm Hg diastolic. Vertical bars denote the s.e.

References

    1. Reddy KS, Yusuf S. Emerging epidemic of cardiovascular disease in developing countries. Circulation. 1998;97 (6:596–601.
    1. Perkovic V, Huxley R, Wu Y, Prabhakaran PD, MacMahon S. The burden of blood pressure-related disease: a neglected priority in global health. Hypertension. 2007;50 (6:991–997.
    1. Opie LH, Seedat YK. Hypertension in sub-Saharan African populations. Circulation. 2005;112 (23:3562–3568.
    1. M'Buyamba-Kabangu JR, Biswika RT, Thijs L, Tshimanga GM, Ngalula FM, Disashi T, et al. In-hospital mortality among black patients admitted for hypertension-related disorders in Mbuji Mayi, Congo. Am J Hypertens. 2009;22 (6:643–648.
    1. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365 (9455:217–223.
    1. Addo J, Smeeth L, Leon DA. Hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa. Hypertension. 2007;50 (6:1012–1018.
    1. Whitworth JA, World Health Organization, International Society of Hypertension Writing Group 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens. 2003;21 (11:1983–1992.
    1. Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366 (9489:895–906.
    1. Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, Dahlöf B, Pitt B, Shi V, et al. Benazapril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008;359 (23:2417–2428.
    1. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, Dahlöf B, Elmfeldt D, Julius S, et al. Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. Lancet. 1998;351 (9118:1755–1762.
    1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black BK, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, Jr., et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42 (6:1206–1252.
    1. British Cardiac Society, British Hypertension Society, Diabetes UK, HEART UK, Primary Care Cardiovascular Society, The Stroke Association JBS 2: Joint British Societies' guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular diseases in clinical practice. Heart. 2005;91 (5:1–52.
    1. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifková R, Fagard R, Germano G, et al. 2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) J Hypertens. 2007;25 (6:1105–1187.
    1. Young JH, Chang YP, Kim JDO, Chretien JP, Klag MJ, Levine AS, et al. Differential susceptibility to hypertension is due to selection during the out-of Africa expansion. PLoS Genet. 2005;1 (6:e82.
    1. Zhu X, Luke A, Cooper RS, Quertermous T, Hanis C, Mosley T, et al. Admixture mapping for hypertension loci with genome-wide markers. Nat Genet. 2005;37 (2:177–181.
    1. Kaufman JS, Owoaje EE, James SA, Rotimi CN, Cooper RS. Determinants of hypertension in West Africa: contribution of anthropometric and dietary factors to urban and socioeconomic gradients. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143 (12:1203–1218.
    1. 41st World Medical Assembly Declaration of Helsinki: recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1990;24 (x:606–609.
    1. Odili AN, Richart T, Thijs L, Kingue S, Boombhi HJ, Lemogoum D, et al. Rationale and design of the Newer Versus Older Antihypertensive Agents In African Hypertensive Patients (NOAAH) trial. Blood Press. 2011;20 (5:256–266.
    1. El Assaad MA, Topouchian JA, Asmar RG. Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol: the Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT. Blood Press Monit. 2003;8 (3:127–133.
    1. Staessen JA, Byttebier G, Buntinx F, Celis H, O'Brien ET, Fagard R. for the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Treatment of Hypertension Investigators. Antihypertensive treatment based on conventional or ambulatory blood pressure measurement. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278 (13:1065–1072.
    1. Staessen JA, Den Hond E, Celis H, Fagard R, Keary L, Vandenhoven G, et al. Antihypertensive treatment based on blood pressure measurement at home or in the physician's office. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291 (8:955–964.
    1. Sareli P, Radevski IV, Valtchanova ZP, Libhaber E, Candy GP, Den Hond E, et al. Efficacy of different drug classes used to initiate antihypertensive treatment in black subjects. Results of a randomized trial in Johannesburg, South Africa. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161 (7:965–971.
    1. Asmar RG, London GM, O'Rourke MF, Safar ME, for the REASON Project coordinators and investigators Improvement in blood pressure, arterial stiffness and wave reflections with a very-low-dose perindopril/indapamide combination in hypertensive patient. A comparison with atenolol. Hypertension. 2001;38 (23:922–926.
    1. Jin Y, Thijs L, Richart T, Li Y, Dolan E, Wang JG, et al. Responses of the ambulatory arterial stiffness index and other measures of arterial function to antihypertensive drugs. Hypertens Res. 2011;34 (4:489–495.
    1. Schiffrin EL, Deng LY, Larochelle P. Effects of a β-blocker or a converting enzyme inhibitor on resistance arteries in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1994;23 (1:83–91.
    1. Lemogoum D, Seedat YK, Mabadeje AFB, Mendis S, Bovet P, Onwubere B, et al. Recommendations for prevention, diagnosis and management of hypertension and cardiovascular risk factors in sub-Saharan Africa. J Hypertens. 2003;21 (11:1993–2000.
    1. da Silva PM. Efficacy of fixed-dose combination therapy in the treatment of patients with hypertension: focus on amlodipine/valsartan. Clin Drug Invest. 2010;30 (9:625–641.
    1. Taddei S. Fixed-dose combination therapy in hypertension: pros. High Blood Press. 2012;19 (2:55–57.
    1. Epstein BJ, Vogel K, Palmer BF. Dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists in the management of hypertension. Drugs. 2007;67 (9:1309–1327.
    1. Khan JM, Beevers DG. Management of hypertension in ethnic minorities. Heart. 2005;91 (8:1105–1109.
    1. Staessen JA, Wang JG, Thijs L.Cardiovascular protection and blood pressure reduction: a meta-analysis[erratum published in The Lancet 2002, volume 359, January 26, p 360]Lancet 2001358(92901305–1315.
    1. Prisant LM, Neutel JM, Ferdinand K, Papademetriou V, DeQuattro V, Hall WD, et al. Low-dose combination therapy as first-line hypertension treatment for Blacks and Nonblacks. J Natl Med Assoc. 1999;91 (1:40–48.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться