Wool-derived keratin dressings versus usual care dressings for treatment of slow-healing venous leg ulceration: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (Keratin4VLU)

Andrew Jull, Angela Wadham, Chris Bullen, Varsha Parag, Jill Waters, Andrew Jull, Angela Wadham, Chris Bullen, Varsha Parag, Jill Waters

Abstract

Introduction: Keratins, filament-forming proteins found in vertebrate epithelium, are downregulated in slow-healing venous leg ulcers (VLU) compared with normal-healing VLU. Laboratory and animal model research has suggested exogenous keratins increase expression of endogenous keratins. A non-randomised controlled trial of an exogenous keratin dressing reported increased healing in slow-healing VLU. To date, no randomised controlled trial has been done to verify these promising findings.

Methods and analysis: The Keratin4VLU trial is a single-blind, pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial of keratin dressings compared with usual care non-medicated dressings in patients with VLU where either (1) the ulcer area is greater than 5 cm2, (2) the ulcer has been present for more than 26 weeks or (3) both. All patients will receive compression therapy. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with healed VLU at 24 weeks after randomisation as adjudicated by blinded review of an ulcer photograph. Secondary outcomes are time to healing, estimated change in ulcer area, change in health-related quality of life, agreement between blinded and unblinded assessors and adverse events. The analysis will be intention-to-treat on the primary and secondary outcomes (excepting health-related quality of life).

Ethics and dissemination: The Keratin4VLU trial received ethical approval from the Northern A Health and Disability Ethics Committee. We plan to publish the results within 1 year of trial completion and will include the results on the trial registration page.

Trial registration number: NCT02896725; Pre-results.

Keywords: bandages and dressings; keratin; skin substitutes; venous leg ulcer; wound healing.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Detailed trial schematic showing participant contacts and measures. HRQoL, health-related quality of life; PIS, participant information sheet.

References

    1. Margolis DJ, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Which venous leg ulcers will heal with limb compression bandages? Am J Med 2000;109:15–19. 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00379-X
    1. Iglesias C, Nelson EA, Cullum NA, et al. . VenUS I: a randomised controlled trial of two types of bandage for treating venous leg ulcers. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:iii, 1-105 10.3310/hta8290
    1. Ashby RL, Gabe R, Ali S, et al. . VenUS IV (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV) - compression hosiery compared with compression bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial, mixed-treatment comparison and decision-analytic model. Health Technol Assess 2014;18:1–294. 10.3310/hta18570
    1. Jull A, Walker N, Parag V, et al. . Randomized clinical trial of honey-impregnated dressings for venous leg ulcers. Br J Surg 2008;95:175–82. 10.1002/bjs.6059
    1. Dumville JC, Worthy G, Bland JM, et al. . Larval therapy for leg ulcers (VenUS II): randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009;338:b773 10.1136/bmj.b773
    1. Watson JM, Kang’ombe AR, Soares MO, et al. . VenUS III: a randomised controlled trial of therapeutic ultrasound in the management of venous leg ulcers. Health Technol Assess 2011;15:1-192 10.3310/hta15130
    1. ECRI Institute Evidence-based Practice center. Skin Substitutes for Treating Chronic Wounds: Technology Assessment Report. Maryland, USA: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2012.
    1. Morasso MI, Tomic-Canic M. Epidermal stem cells: the cradle of epidermal determination, differentiation and wound healing. Biol Cell 2005;97:173–83. 10.1042/BC20040098
    1. Pastar I, Stojadinovic O, Yin NC, et al. . Epithelialization in wound healing: a comprehensive review. Adv Wound Care 2014;3:445–64. 10.1089/wound.2013.0473
    1. Charles CA, Tomic-Canic M, Vincek V, et al. . A gene signature of nonhealing venous ulcers: potential diagnostic markers. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;59:758–71. 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.07.018
    1. Tang L, Sierra JO, Kelly R, et al. . Wool-derived keratin stimulates human keratinocyte migration and types IV and VII collagen expression. Exp Dermatol 2012;21:458–60. 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2012.01505.x
    1. Pechter PM, Gil J, Valdes J, et al. . Keratin dressings speed epithelialization of deep partial-thickness wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2012;20:236–42. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00768.x
    1. Hammond CE, Than M, Walker JW. From the laboratory to the leg: Patients’ and nurses’ perceptions of product application using three different dressing formats. Wound Pract Res 2010;18:189–95.
    1. Fu X, Kelly R, Marsh C, et al. . A concurrent cohort clinical study of functional keratin dressings for treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers. Denver: Symposium on Advanced Wound Care, 2013.
    1. Jull A, Wadham A, Bullen C, et al. . Low dose aspirin as adjuvant treatment for venous leg ulceration: pragmatic, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial (Aspirin4VLU). BMJ 2017;358:j5157 10.1136/bmj.j5157
    1. Jull A, Parag V, Walker N, et al. . The prepare pilot RCT of home-based progressive resistance exercises for venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 2009;18:497–503. 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.12.45606
    1. Hróbjartsson A, Thomsen AS, Emanuelsson F, et al. . Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors. BMJ 2012;344:e1119 10.1136/bmj.e1119
    1. Stacey MC, Burnand KG, Layer GT, et al. . Measurement of the healing of venous ulcers. Aust N Z J Surg 1991;61:844–8. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1991.tb00169.x
    1. Jull A, Walker N, Hackett M, et al. . Leg ulceration and perceived health: a population based case-control study. Age Ageing 2004;33:236–41. 10.1093/ageing/afh087
    1. National Centre for Classification in Health. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Australian Modification. Australia: The University of Sydney, 2014.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377–81. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
    1. Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999;319:670–4. 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться