Randomised clinical trial: a phase 1b study of GB004, an oral HIF-1α stabiliser, for treatment of ulcerative colitis

Silvio Danese, Barrett G Levesque, Brian G Feagan, Alina Jucov, Bal Raj Bhandari, Rish K Pai, Kristen Taylor Meadows, Brian J Kirby, Jean-Marie Bruey, Allan Olson, Robin Osterhout, Courtney Van Biene, Julia Ford, Richard Aranda, Kartik Raghupathi, William J Sandborn, Silvio Danese, Barrett G Levesque, Brian G Feagan, Alina Jucov, Bal Raj Bhandari, Rish K Pai, Kristen Taylor Meadows, Brian J Kirby, Jean-Marie Bruey, Allan Olson, Robin Osterhout, Courtney Van Biene, Julia Ford, Richard Aranda, Kartik Raghupathi, William J Sandborn

Abstract

Background: Epithelial barrier dysfunction contributes to a dysregulated intestinal immune response in ulcerative colitis (UC). GB004 is an orally administered, small molecule, gut-targeted stabiliser of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, a transcription factor with protective roles at the epithelial layer of the inflamed gut.

Aims: To evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of GB004 in patients with active UC.

Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomised patients 2:1 to receive an oral solution of GB004 120 mg or placebo once daily for 28 days. Eligible patients had a Robarts Histopathology Index score ≥4 with neutrophils in the epithelium, total Mayo Clinic score 3-12, Mayo Clinic endoscopic subscore ≥1, and blood in the stool, despite treatment with 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids or immunosuppressants.

Results: Thirty-four patients were randomised. GB004 120 mg for 28 days was generally well-tolerated. Adverse events occurred in 27.3% (3/11) and 39.1% (9/23) of patients in the placebo and GB004 groups respectively. Nausea and dysgeusia were most commonly reported in the GB004 group (0% for placebo and 21.7% [5/23] and 13.0% [3/23] respectively for GB004). There were no treatment-related serious adverse events or deaths. GB004 exhibited minimal accumulation, with higher colonic concentrations relative to plasma. Exploratory pharmacodynamic and efficacy analyses demonstrated GB004 target engagement and numerically higher proportions of patients achieving improvement in multiple measures of disease activity, respectively, at day 28 for GB004 compared to placebo.

Conclusion: Results from this phase 1b trial support evaluation of the full therapeutic potential of GB004 for the treatment of UC. A phase 2 study (NCT04556383) is ongoing. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03860896.

Keywords: HIF-1α; epithelial barrier dysfunction; histologic remission; mucosal healing.

© 2022 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Patient disposition
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Changes from baseline to day 28 in pharmacodynamic measures of GB004 target engagement and biomarkers. (A) proportion of HIF‐1α‐positive cells; (B) faecal calprotectin; (C) proportion of MPO‐positive cells; (D) faecal secretory immunoglobulin A. Analyses were based on observed data. Treatment effect estimates (95% CIs) are shown as differences between GB004 and placebo. Abbreviations: HIF, hypoxia inducible factor; MPO, myeloperoxidase
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Exploratory efficacy endpoints at day 28. (A) clinical response, rectal bleeding resolution, and clinical remission; (B) improvement in endoscopic appearance; histologic remission; and mucosal healing; (C) composite endpoints requiring concurrent achievement of: rectal bleeding resolution and histologic remission; rectal bleeding resolution, clinical response, and histologic remission; and rectal bleeding resolution, clinical response, histologic remission, and molecular improvement; (D) composite endpoints requiring concurrent achievement of: rectal bleeding resolution and mucosal healing; rectal bleeding resolution, clinical response, and mucosal healing; and rectal bleeding resolution, clinical response, mucosal healing, and molecular improvement. Proportions are the number of patients meeting the endpoint out of the number evaluable. Evaluable patients with missing values for an endpoint were considered as not meeting the endpoint (0 patients in the placebo group, and 2 patients in the GB004 group for all endpoints in (A) and (B), with the exceptions of clinical response and clinical remission [3 patients each]). One patient in the GB004 group meeting the composite endpoint of rectal bleeding resolution and clinical response and histologic remission or mucosal healing had missing gene expression data. Treatment effect estimates (95% CIs) are shown as differences between GB004 and placebo

References

    1. Ungaro R, Mehandru S, Allen PB, et al. Ulcerative colitis. Lancet. 2017;389:1756–1770.
    1. Lee SH, Kwon JE, Cho ML. Immunological pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Intest Res. 2018;16:26–42.
    1. Martini E, Krug SM, Siegmund B, et al. Mend your fences: the epithelial barrier and its relationship with mucosal immunity in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;4:33–46.
    1. Harbord M, Eliakim R, Bettenworth D, et al. Third European evidence‐based consensus on diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. part 2: current management. J Crohns Colitis. 2017;11:769–784.
    1. Alsoud D, Verstockt B, Fiocchi C, et al. Breaking the therapeutic ceiling in drug development in ulcerative colitis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6:589–595.
    1. Ozaki R, Kobayashi T, Okabayashi S, et al. Histological risk factors to predict clinical relapse in ulcerative colitis with endoscopically normal mucosa. J Crohns Colitis. 2018;12:1288–1294.
    1. Narang V, Kaur R, Garg B, et al. Association of endoscopic and histological remission with clinical course in patients of ulcerative colitis. Intest Res. 2018;16:55–61.
    1. Pai RK, Jairath V, Vande Casteele N, et al. The emerging role of histologic disease activity assessment in ulcerative colitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:887–898.
    1. Bryant RV, Burger DC, Delo J, et al. Beyond endoscopic mucosal healing in UC: histological remission better predicts corticosteroid use and hospitalisation over 6 years of follow‐up. Gut. 2016;65:408–414.
    1. Park S, Abdi T, Gentry M, et al. Histological disease activity as a predictor of clinical relapse among patients with ulcerative colitis: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:1692–1701.
    1. Chateau T, Feakins R, Marchal‐Bressenot A, et al. Histological remission in ulcerative colitis: under the microscope is the cure. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115:179–189.
    1. Peyrin‐Biroulet L, Bressenot A, Kampman W. Histologic remission: the ultimate therapeutic goal in ulcerative colitis? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:929–934.e2.
    1. Mathis D, Shoelson SE. Immunometabolism: an emerging frontier. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:81.
    1. Kominsky DJ, Campbell EL, Colgan SP. Metabolic shifts in immunity and inflammation. J Immunol. 2010;184:4062–4068.
    1. Colgan SP, Taylor CT. Hypoxia: an alarm signal during intestinal inflammation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7:281–287.
    1. Eltzschig HK, Carmeliet P. Hypoxia and inflammation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:656–665.
    1. Colgan SP, Eltzschig HK. Adenosine and hypoxia‐inducible factor signaling in intestinal injury and recovery. Annu Rev Physiol. 2012;74:153–175.
    1. Clambey ET, McNamee EN, Westrich JA, et al. Hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1 alpha‐dependent induction of FoxP3 drives regulatory T‐cell abundance and function during inflammatory hypoxia of the mucosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E2784–E2793.
    1. Karhausen J, Furuta GT, Tomaszewski JE, et al. Epithelial hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1 is protective in murine experimental colitis. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:1098–1106.
    1. Brown E, Rowan C, Strowitzki MJ, et al. Mucosal inflammation downregulates PHD1 expression promoting a barrier‐protective HIF‐1alpha response in ulcerative colitis patients. FASEB J. 2020;34:3732‐3742.
    1. Robinson A, Keely S, Karhausen J, et al. Mucosal protection by hypoxia‐inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibition. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:145–155.
    1. Cummins EP, Seeballuck F, Keely SJ, et al. The hydroxylase inhibitor dimethyloxalylglycine is protective in a murine model of colitis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:156–165.
    1. Tambuwala MM, Cummins EP, Lenihan CR, et al. Loss of prolyl hydroxylase‐1 protects against colitis through reduced epithelial cell apoptosis and increased barrier function. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:2093–2101.
    1. Keely S, Campbell EL, Baird AW, et al. Contribution of epithelial innate immunity to systemic protection afforded by prolyl hydroxylase inhibition in murine colitis. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7:114–123.
    1. Marks E, Goggins BJ, Cardona J, et al. Oral delivery of prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor: AKB‐4924 promotes localized mucosal healing in a mouse model of colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21:267–275.
    1. Okumura CY, Hollands A, Tran DN, et al. A new pharmacological agent (AKB‐4924) stabilizes hypoxia inducible factor‐1 (HIF‐1) and increases skin innate defenses against bacterial infection. J Mol Med (Berl). 2012;90:1079–1089.
    1. Taylor‐Meadows K, Murphy S, Opiteck GJ, et al. GB004 exhibits protective effects directly on epithelial cell using ex vivo organoid and monolayer cultures. Gastroenterology. 2021;160:S238–S239.
    1. Levesque B, Taylor‐Meadows K, Buch A, et al. GB004, a novel gut‐targeted prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor for inflammatory bowel disease: first‐in‐human, multiple‐dose study in healthy subjects with gut biopsies. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:S15–S16.
    1. Levesque B, Flynn M, Peters K, et al. Phase 1a safety and pharmacokinetic effects of GB004, a novel prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor and potential therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:S13.
    1. Haberman Y, Karns R, Dexheimer PJ, et al. Ulcerative colitis mucosal transcriptomes reveal mitochondriopathy and personalized mechanisms underlying disease severity and treatment response. Nat Commun. 2019;10:38.
    1. Chan IS, Zhang Z. Test‐based exact confidence intervals for the difference of two binomial proportions. Biometrics. 1999;55:1202–1209.
    1. Barrodale I, Robarts FDK. An improved algorithm for discrete l 1 linear approximation. SIAM J Numerical Anal. 1973;10:839–848.
    1. Wells JM, Brummer RJ, Derrien M, et al. Homeostasis of the gut barrier and potential biomarkers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017;312:G171–G193.
    1. Corthesy B. Role of secretory IgA in infection and maintenance of homeostasis. Autoimmun Rev. 2013;12:661–665.
    1. Gutzeit C, Magri G, Cerutti A. Intestinal IgA production and its role in host‐microbe interaction. Immunol Rev. 2014;260:76–85.
    1. Akizawa T, Iwasaki M, Otsuka T, et al. Roxadustat treatment of chronic kidney disease‐associated anemia in Japanese patients not on dialysis: a phase 2, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Adv Ther. 2019;36:1438–1454.
    1. Ariazi JL, Duffy KJ, Adams DF, et al. Discovery and preclinical characterization of GSK1278863 (Daprodustat), a small molecule hypoxia inducible factor‐prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor for anemia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2017;363:336–347.
    1. Barratt J, Andric B, Tataradze A, et al. Roxadustat for the treatment of anaemia in chronic kidney disease patients not on dialysis: a phase 3, randomised, open‐label, active‐controlled study (DOLOMITES). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;36:1616–1628.
    1. Fishbane S, El‐Shahawy MA, Pecoits‐Filho R, et al. Roxadustat for treating anemia in patients with CKD not on dialysis: results from a randomized phase 3 study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32:737–755.
    1. Truelove SC, Richards WC. Biopsy studies in ulcerative colitis. Br Med J. 1956;1:1315–1318.
    1. Mosli MH, Parker CE, Nelson SA, et al. Histologic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5:CD011256.
    1. Danese S, Roda G, Peyrin‐Biroulet L. Evolving therapeutic goals in ulcerative colitis: towards disease clearance. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:1–2.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться