A Phase II, randomized, immunogenicity and safety study of a quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine, MenACYW-TT, in healthy adolescents in the United States

Lee-Jah Chang, James Hedrick, Shane Christensen, Judy Pan, Emilia Jordanov, Mandeep S Dhingra, Lee-Jah Chang, James Hedrick, Shane Christensen, Judy Pan, Emilia Jordanov, Mandeep S Dhingra

Abstract

Background: MenACYW-TT is an investigational quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine intended for use in individuals ≥6 weeks of age. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of MenACYW-TT when compared to a licensed quadrivalent conjugate meningococcal vaccine (Menveo®; MCV4-CRM; GlaxoSmithKline, Italy), and when co-administered with tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (Tdap) and human papilloma virus (HPV4) vaccines in healthy meningococcal vaccine-naïve adolescents (10-17 years old) in the United States of America.

Methods: In this pivotal Phase II, open-label, multicenter study, 1715 participants were randomized to receive MenACYW-TT, MCV4-CRM, MenACYW-TT co-administered with Tdap and HPV4, or Tdap and HPV4 vaccines alone (NCT02199691). The primary objective was to evaluate whether antibody responses to MenACYW-TT antigens were non-inferior to antibody responses after MCV4-CRM administration. Meningococcal antibody titers were determined using human complement serum bactericidal assay (hSBA) with titers measured at baseline, and 30 days post vaccination (D30). A vaccine seroresponse was defined as baseline titers <1:8 with post-vaccination titers ≥1:8 or baseline titers ≥1:8 with a ≥4-fold increase at post-vaccination. Safety data were collected up to six months post-vaccination.

Results: Non-inferiority was demonstrated for MenACYW-TT vs MCV4-CRM (primary endpoint), and for MenACYW-TT co-administered with Tdap and HPV4 vs MenACYW-TT alone (secondary endpoint). The vaccine seroresponse rate was higher with MenACYW-TT than with MCV4-CRM, for each serogroup: A: 75.6% vs 66.4%; C: 97.2% vs 72.6%; W: 86.2% vs 66.6%; Y: 97.0% vs 80.8%. The safety profiles of MenACYW-TT, MCV4-CRM, and Tdap and HPV4 vaccines, administered with or without MenACYW-TT, were comparable. There were no vaccine-related serious adverse events.

Conclusions: The MenACYW-TT vaccine was well tolerated and generated an immune response that was non-inferior to the licensed MCV4-CRM vaccine. Immunogenicity and safety profiles were comparable when MenACYW-TT was administered with or without Tdap and HPV4 vaccines in meningococcal vaccine-naïve adolescents.

Keywords: Concomitant vaccine; Conjugate vaccine; HPV4; Invasive meningococcal disease; MenACYW-TT; Meningococcal vaccine naïve adolescents; Tdap.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: LJC, JP, EJ, & MSD are employees of Sanofi Pasteur. JH and SC received a grant to carry out the research at their respective study sites.

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться