Elagolix Treatment for Up to 12 Months in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding and Uterine Leiomyomas

James A Simon, Ayman Al-Hendy, David F Archer, Kurt T Barnhart, Linda D Bradley, Bruce R Carr, Thomas Dayspring, Eve C Feinberg, Veronica Gillispie, Sandra Hurtado, JinHee Kim, Ran Liu, Charlotte D Owens, Ozgul Muneyyirci-Delale, Alice Wang, Nelson B Watts, William D Schlaff, James A Simon, Ayman Al-Hendy, David F Archer, Kurt T Barnhart, Linda D Bradley, Bruce R Carr, Thomas Dayspring, Eve C Feinberg, Veronica Gillispie, Sandra Hurtado, JinHee Kim, Ran Liu, Charlotte D Owens, Ozgul Muneyyirci-Delale, Alice Wang, Nelson B Watts, William D Schlaff

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of elagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, with hormonal add-back therapy for up to 12 months in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas.

Methods: Elaris UF-EXTEND was a phase 3 extension study that evaluated an additional 6 months (up to 12 months total) of elagolix 300 mg twice daily with hormonal add-back therapy (estradiol 1 mg and norethindrone acetate 0.5 mg once daily) in women who completed an initial 6 months of the same treatment in one of two preceding phase 3 studies. The primary endpoint was the percentage of women with both less than 80 mL menstrual blood loss during final month and a 50% or greater reduction in menstrual blood loss from baseline to final month. Safety evaluations included adverse events and bone mineral density changes. The planned sample size of UF-EXTEND was based on estimated rollover and discontinuation rates in the two preceding studies.

Results: From September 2016 to March 2019, 433 women were enrolled in UF-EXTEND. Of these women, 218 received up to 12 months of elagolix with add-back therapy; the mean±SD age of this group was 42.4±5.4 years and 67.3% were black. The percentage of women who met the primary endpoint in this elagolix with add-back group was 87.9% (95% CI [83.4-92.3]). The most frequently reported adverse events with up to 12 months of elagolix plus add-back therapy were hot flush (6.9%), night sweats (3.2%), headache (5.5%), and nausea (4.1%). Mean percent decreases in bone mineral density from baseline to extension month 6 were significantly less with elagolix plus add-back therapy than with elagolix alone {between-group difference in lumbar spine: -3.3 (95% CI [-4.1 to -2.5])}.

Conclusion: Up to 12 months of elagolix with add-back therapy provided sustained reduction in menstrual blood loss in women with uterine leiomyomas, with the addition of add-back therapy attenuating the hypoestrogenic effects of elagolix alone. No new or unexpected safety concerns were associated with an additional 6 months of elagolix with addback therapy.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02925494.

Funding source: AbbVie Inc funded this study.

Figures

Fig. 1.. Study design and disposition of…
Fig. 1.. Study design and disposition of women treated with up to 12 months of elagolix. Elagolix alone, elagolix 300 mg twice daily throughout UF-1 and UF-2 and UF-EXTEND; elagolix with add-back therapy, elagolix 300 mg twice daily with add-back therapy (estradiol 1 mg and norethindrone 0.5 mg once daily) throughout UF-1 and UF-2 and UF-EXTEND. *In UF-1 and UF-2 combined, 5 of 150 (3.3%) women treated with elagolix alone and 3 of 312 (1.0%) women treated with elagolix plus add-back therapy did not enter UF-EXTEND because of a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan (DXA) finding of bone mineral density decrease greater than 8% in at least one of the anatomic locations (lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck). †The most common other reason was that the extension study was closed to enrollment. ‡Women required surgery or invasive intervention for treatment of uterine leiomyomas. Other reasons for premature discontinuation included moved out of state (n=2), weight exceeded DXA limits, study site closing, participant stopped drug because she thought she was pregnant but was not, did not like bleeding while on medication, personal reasons, and DXA results.
Simon. Twelve Months of Elagolix With Add-Back Therapy. Obstet Gynecol 2020.
Fig. 2.. Percentage of women who met…
Fig. 2.. Percentage of women who met the primary endpoint (A) and mean change from baseline in menstrual blood loss in women treated with up to 12 months of elagolix with add-back therapy (B). Data are % or mean with error bars indicating 95% CI. Baseline was before first dosing in the UF-1 and UF-2 studies. *Mean changes from baseline in menstrual blood loss for UF-1 and UF-2 are presented as least squares means.
Simon. Twelve Months of Elagolix With Add-Back Therapy. Obstet Gynecol 2020.
Fig. 3.. Lumbar spine bone mineral density…
Fig. 3.. Lumbar spine bone mineral density changes from baseline (A) and bone mineral density Z-scores during treatment and posttreatment periods in women treated with up to 12 months of elagolix (B). Bone mineral density changes are presented as least square mean percent change, with error bars indicating 95% CI. Bone mineral density Z-scores are presented as median, quartile 1, quartile 3, and range. Bone mineral density changes and Z-scores for UF-1 and UF-2 exclude participants who switched machine types. Elagolix alone, elagolix 300 mg twice daily throughout UF-1 and UF-2 and UF-EXTEND; elagolix with add-back therapy, elagolix 300 mg twice daily with add-back therapy (estradiol 1 mg and norethindrone 0.5 mg once daily) throughout UF-1 and UF-2 and UF-EXTEND. Baseline was before first dosing in UF-1 and UF-2 studies. *P≤.05 for test of difference between the elagolix with add-back therapy and elagolix-alone groups using an analysis of covariance model with treatment as the main effect and baseline value as a covariate for extension month 6.
Simon. Twelve Months of Elagolix With Add-Back Therapy. Obstet Gynecol 2020.
Fig. 4.. Total hip bone mineral density…
Fig. 4.. Total hip bone mineral density changes from baseline (A) and bone mineral density Z-scores during treatment and posttreatment periods in women treated with up to 12 months of elagolix (B). Bone mineral density changes are presented as least square mean percent change with error bars indicating 95% CI. Bone mineral density Z-scores are presented as median, quartile 1, quartile 3, and range. Bone mineral density changes and Z-scores for UF-1 and UF-2 exclude participants who switched machine types. Elagolix alone, elagolix 300 mg twice daily throughout UF-1 and UF-2 and UF-EXTEND; elagolix with add-back therapy, elagolix 300 mg twice daily with add-back therapy (estradiol 1 mg and norethindrone 0.5 mg once daily) throughout UF-1 and UF-2 and UF-EXTEND. Baseline was before first dosing in UF-1 and UF-2 studies. *P≤.05 for test of difference between the elagolix with add-back therapy and elagolix-alone groups using an analysis of covariance model with treatment as the main effect and baseline value as a covariate for extension month 6.
Simon. Twelve Months of Elagolix With Add-Back Therapy. Obstet Gynecol 2020.
Fig. 5.. Femoral neck bone mineral density…
Fig. 5.. Femoral neck bone mineral density changes from baseline (A) and bone mineral density Z-scores during treatment and posttreatment periods in women treated with up to 12 months of elagolix (B). Bone mineral density changes are presented as least square mean percent change, with error bars indicating 95% CI. Bone mineral density Z-scores are presented as median, quartile 1, quartile 3, and range. Bone mineral density changes and Z-scores for UF-1 and UF-2 exclude participants who switched machine types. Elagolix alone, elagolix 300 mg twice daily throughout UF-1 and UF-2 and UF-EXTEND; elagolix with add-back therapy, elagolix 300 mg twice daily with add-back therapy (estradiol 1 mg and norethindrone 0.5 mg once daily) throughout UF-1 and UF-2 and UF-EXTEND. Baseline was before first dosing in UF-1 and UF-2 studies. *P≤.05 for test of difference between the elagolix with add-back therapy and elagolix-alone groups using an analysis of covariance model with treatment as the main effect and baseline value as a covariate for extension month 6.
Simon. Twelve Months of Elagolix With Add-Back Therapy. Obstet Gynecol 2020.

References

    1. Stewart EA, Nicholson WK, Bradley L, Borah BJ. The burden of uterine fibroids for African-American women: results of a national survey. J Women’s Health 2013;22:807–16.
    1. Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC, Cousins D, Schectman JM. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:100–7.
    1. Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids. Lancet 2001;357:293–8.
    1. Wegienka G, Baird DD, Hertz-Picciotto I, Harlow SD, Steege JF, Hill MC, et al. Self-reported heavy bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:431–7.
    1. Napolitano M, Dolce A, Celenza G, Grandone E, Perilli MG, Siragusa S, et al. Iron-dependent erythropoiesis in women with excessive menstrual blood losses and women with normal menses. Ann Hematol 2014;93:557–63.
    1. Fuldeore MJ, Soliman AM. Patient-reported prevalence and symptomatic burden of uterine fibroids among women in the United States: findings from a cross-sectional survey analysis. Int J Women’s Health 2017;9:403–11.
    1. Soliman AM, Margolis MK, Castelli-Haley J, Fuldeore MJ, Owens CD, Coyne KS. Impact of uterine fibroid symptoms on health-related quality of life of US women: evidence from a cross-sectional survey. Curr Med Res Opin 2017;33:1971–8.
    1. Ghant MS, Sengoba KS, Recht H, Cameron KA, Lawson AK, Marsh EE. Beyond the physical: a qualitative assessment of the burden of symptomatic uterine fibroids on women’s emotional and psychosocial health. J Psychosomatic Res 2015;78:499–503.
    1. Cardozo ER, Clark AD, Banks NK, Henne MB, Stegmann BJ, Segars JH. The estimated annual cost of uterine leiomyomata in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:211.e1–9.
    1. Fuldeore M, Yang H, Soliman AM, Winkel C. Healthcare utilization and costs among women diagnosed with uterine fibroids: a longitudinal evaluation for 5 years pre- and post-diagnosis. Curr Med Res Opin 2015;31:1719–31.
    1. Soliman AM, Anand SB, Coyne KS, Castelli-Haley J, Snabes M, Owens CD. Examining the relationship between symptomatic burden and self-reported productivity losses among patients with uterine fibroids in the United States. J Occup Environ Med 2017;59:974–81.
    1. Zimmermann A, Bernuit D, Gerlinger C, Schaefers M, Geppert K. Prevalence, symptoms and management of uterine fibroids: an international internet-based survey of 21,746 women. BMC Womens Health 2012;12:6.
    1. Stewart EA. Clinical practice. Uterine fibroids. New Engl J Med 2015;372:1646–55.
    1. Borah BJ, Yao X, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Heien HC, Stewart EA. Comparative effectiveness of uterine leiomyoma procedures using a large insurance claims database. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:1047–56.
    1. Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Uterine fibroid management: from the present to the future. Human Reprod Update 2016;22:665–86.
    1. Gurusamy KS, Vaughan J, Fraser IS, Best LM, Richards T. Medical therapies for uterine fibroids—a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS One 2016;11:e0149631.
    1. Schlaff WD, Ackerman RT, Al-Hendy A, Archer DF, Barnhart KT, Bradley LD, et al. Elagolix for heavy menstrual bleeding in women with uterine fibroids. New Engl J Med 2020;382:328–40.
    1. Magnay JL, Schonicke G, Nevatte TM, O’Brien S, Junge W. Validation of a rapid alkaline hematin technique to measure menstrual blood loss on feminine towels containing superabsorbent polymers. Fertil Steril 2011;96:394–8.
    1. Coyne KS, Soliman AM, Margolis MK, Thompson CL, Chwalisz K. Validation of the 4 week recall version of the uterine fibroid symptom and health-related quality of life (UFS-QOL) questionnaire. Curr Med Res Opin 2017;33:193–200.
    1. International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Official positions 2015: adult and pediatric. Available at: . Retrieved November 19, 2017.
    1. Persson L, Henriksson P, Westerlund E, Hovatta O, Angelin B, Rudling M. Endogenous estrogens lower plasma PCSK9 and LDL cholesterol but not Lp(a) or bile acid synthesis in women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2012;32:810–4.
    1. Ghosh M, Galman C, Rudling M, Angelin B. Influence of physiological changes in endogenous estrogen on circulating PCSK9 and LDL cholesterol. J Lipid Res 2015;56:463–9.
    1. Higham JM, O'Brien PM, Shaw RW. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:734–9.
    1. Mansfield PK, Voda A, Allison G. Validating a pencil-and-paper measure of perimenopausal menstrual blood loss. Womens Health Issues 2004;14:242–7.
    1. Reid PC, Coker A, Coltart R. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart: a validation study. BJOG 2000;107:320–2.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться