Effects of vancomycin-induced gut microbiome alteration on the pharmacodynamics of metformin in healthy male subjects

Eunwoo Kim, Andrew Hyoungjin Kim, Yujin Lee, Sang Chun Ji, Joo-Youn Cho, Kyung-Sang Yu, Jae-Yong Chung, Eunwoo Kim, Andrew Hyoungjin Kim, Yujin Lee, Sang Chun Ji, Joo-Youn Cho, Kyung-Sang Yu, Jae-Yong Chung

Abstract

Metformin is a major treatment for type 2 diabetes. This study was conducted to investigate the impact of gut microbiome dysbiosis on the pharmacokinetics and antihyperglycemic effects of metformin. Healthy adult males aged 19-45 years with no defecation abnormalities were recruited for this 4-period clinical study: baseline; post-metformin (i.e., multiple oral doses of 1000 mg metformin on days 1-4); post-vancomycin (i.e., multiple oral doses of 500 mg vancomycin on days 11-17 inducing gut microbiome changes); and post-metformin + vancomycin (i.e., multiple oral doses of 1000 mg metformin on days 16-19). In each period, serum glucose and insulin concentrations following an oral glucose tolerance test, fecal samples for gut microbiome composition, and safety data were obtained. Following metformin dosing, plasma and urine samples for pharmacokinetics were collected. Nine subjects completed the study. The pharmacokinetics of metformin remained unchanged, and the antihyperglycemic effect was significantly decreased after vancomycin administration (p value = 0.039), demonstrating the weak relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metformin. Relative abundances of some genus were changed after vancomycin administration, and tended to correlate with the antihyperglycemic effects of metformin (p value = 0.062 for Erysipelatoclostridium; p value = 0.039 for Enterobacter; and p value = 0.086 for Faecalibacterium). Adverse events occurred in all subjects and were resolved without sequelae. In conclusion, a decrease in the antihyperglycemic effect of metformin was observed after concomitant administration with vancomycin, without changes in metformin pharmacokinetics. The antihyperglycemic effect was tended to correlate with the relative abundance of several genus, suggesting that the effect of metformin is partly attributable to the gut microbiome (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03809260).

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declared no competing interests for this work.

© 2021 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Pharmacokinetics of metformin and the impact of metformin and vancomycin on AUGC. Mean plasma concentration‐time profiles of metformin (a), mean serum concentration‐time profiles of glucose (b), and correlation between pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic parameters after administration of metformin and metformin + vancomycin (c). Note: Bars represent the SDs in (a) and (b). AUClast, area under the plasma concentration curve from time 0 to last measurable time point; AUGC, area under the glucose concentration curve from time 0 to 2 h; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; ΔAUGC of post‐metformin obtained by subtracting the value of baseline from that of post‐metformin; ΔAUGC of post‐metformin + vancomycin obtained by subtracting the value of post‐vancomycin from that of post‐metformin + vancomycin
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Changes in composition of gut microbiome represented by (a) alpha diversity (Shannon index) and (b) beta diversity (principal coordinates analysis plot) measured at genus level. Each axis in (b) represents the highest and second‐highest percent of the variation between the samples
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Relative abundance of intestinal bacterial phyla
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Correlation between ΔAUGC and relative abundance of (a) Escherichia, (b) Erysipelatoclostridium, (c) Enterobacter, and (d) Faecalibacterium. Note: ΔAUGC, change of area under the glucose curve between two periods; ΔAUGC of post‐metformin obtained by subtracting the value of baseline from that of post‐metformin; ΔAUGC of post‐metformin + vancomycin obtained by subtracting the value of post‐vancomycin from that of post‐metformin + vancomycin; relative abundance, relative abundance of each period (post‐metformin or post‐metformin + vancomycin)

References

    1. Rehani PR, Iftikhar H, Nakajima M, Tanaka T, Jabbar Z, Rehani RN. Safety and mode of action of diabetes medications in comparison with 5‐aminolevulinic acid (5‐ALA). J Diabetes Res. 2019;2019:4267357.
    1. Rena G, Hardie DG, Pearson ER. The mechanisms of action of metformin. Diabetologia. 2017;60:1577‐1585.
    1. Minamii T, Nogami M, Ogawa W. Mechanisms of metformin action: In and out of the gut. J Diabetes Investig. 2018;9:701‐703.
    1. Oh J, Chung H, Park S‐I, et al. Inhibition of the multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) transporter by pyrimethamine increases the plasma concentration of metformin but does not increase antihyperglycaemic activity in humans. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18:104‐108.
    1. Chung H, Oh J, Yoon SH, Yu KS, Cho JY, Chung JY. A non‐linear pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic relationship of metformin in healthy volunteers: an open‐label, parallel group, randomized clinical study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191258.
    1. Sum CF, Webster JM, Johnson AB, Catalano C, Cooper BG, Taylor R. The effect of intravenous metformin on glucose metabolism during hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 1992;9:61‐65.
    1. Dujic T, Zhou K, Yee SW, et al. Variants in pharmacokinetic transporters and glycemic response to metformin: a Metgen meta‐analysis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;101:763‐772.
    1. Shreiner AB, Kao JY, Young VB. The gut microbiome in health and in disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2015;31:69‐75.
    1. Zhang J, Zhang J, Wang R. Gut microbiota modulates drug pharmacokinetics. Drug Metab Rev. 2018;50:357‐368.
    1. Wu H, Esteve E, Tremaroli V, et al. Metformin alters the gut microbiome of individuals with treatment‐naive type 2 diabetes, contributing to the therapeutic effects of the drug. Nat Med. 2017;23:850‐858.
    1. Bryrup T, Thomsen CW, Kern T, et al. Metformin‐induced changes of the gut microbiota in healthy young men: results of a non‐blinded, one‐armed intervention study. Diabetologia. 2019;62:1024‐1035.
    1. Rao S, Kupfer Y, Pagala M, Chapnick E, Tessler S. Systemic absorption of oral vancomycin in patients with Clostridium difficile infection. Scand J Infect Dis. 2011;43:386‐388.
    1. Isaac S, Scher JU, Djukovic A, et al. Short‐ and long‐term effects of oral vancomycin on the human intestinal microbiota. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:128‐136.
    1. Reijnders D, Goossens GH, Hermes GDA, et al. Effects of gut microbiota manipulation by antibiotics on host metabolism in obese humans: a randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial. Cell Metab. 2016;24:341.
    1. Dhariwal A, Chong J, Habib S, King IL, Agellon LB, Xia J. MicrobiomeAnalyst: a web‐based tool for comprehensive statistical, visual and meta‐analysis of microbiome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W180‐W188.
    1. MicrobiomeAnalysis . . (2020).
    1. Forslund K, Hildebrand F, Nielsen T, et al. Disentangling type 2 diabetes and metformin treatment signatures in the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2015;528:262‐266.
    1. Elbere I, Kalnina I, Silamikelis I, et al. Association of metformin administration with gut microbiome dysbiosis in healthy volunteers. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0204317.
    1. Zhang C, Wu W, Li X, Xin X, Liu D. Daily supplementation with fresh Angelica keiskei juice alleviates high‐fat diet‐induced obesity in mice by modulating gut microbiota composition. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2019;63(14):e1900248.
    1. Breton J, Tennoune N, Lucas N, et al. Gut commensal E. coli proteins activate host satiety pathways following nutrient‐induced bacterial growth. Cell Metab. 2016;23:324‐334.
    1. Priyadarsini S, Mukherjee S, Samikshya SN, et al. Dietary infection of Enterobacter ludwigii causes fat accumulation and resulted in the diabetes‐like condition in Drosophila melanogaster. Microb Pathog. 2020;149:104276.
    1. Li LL, Wang YT, Zhu LM, Liu ZY, Ye CQ, Qin S. Inulin with different degrees of polymerization protects against diet‐induced endotoxemia and inflammation in association with gut microbiota regulation in mice. Sci Rep. 2020;10:978.
    1. Zhang F, Wang M, Yang J, et al. Response of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes to hypoglycemic agents. Endocrine. 2019;66:485‐493.
    1. Zhang X, Shen D, Fang Z, et al. Human gut microbiota changes reveal the progression of glucose intolerance. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71108.
    1. Ahmad A, Yang W, Chen G, et al. Analysis of gut microbiota of obese individuals with type 2 diabetes and healthy individuals. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0226372.
    1. Huang M, Wang F, Zhou X, Yang H, Wang Y. Hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic properties of polysaccharides from Enterobacter cloacae Z0206 in KKAy mice. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;117:91‐98.
    1. Kyriachenko Y, Falalyeyeva T, Korotkyi O, Molochek N, Kobyliak N. Crosstalk between gut microbiota and antidiabetic drug action. World J Diabetes. 2019;10:154‐168.
    1. Basolo A, Hohenadel M, Ang QY, et al. Effects of underfeeding and oral vancomycin on gut microbiome and nutrient absorption in humans. Nat Med. 2020;26:589‐598.
    1. Lee H, Lee Y, Kim J, et al. Modulation of the gut microbiota by metformin improves metabolic profiles in aged obese mice. Gut Microbes. 2018;9:155‐165.
    1. Ryan PM, Patterson E, Carafa I, et al. Metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor differentially modulate the intestinal microbiota and plasma metabolome of metabolically dysfunctional mice. Can J Diabetes. 2020;44:146‐55 e2.
    1. Wang K, Liao M, Zhou N, et al. Parabacteroides distasonis alleviates obesity and metabolic dysfunctions via production of succinate and secondary bile acids. Cell Rep. 2019;26:222‐35 e5.
    1. Li Q, Chang Y, Zhang K, Chen H, Tao S, Zhang Z. Implication of the gut microbiome composition of type 2 diabetic patients from northern China. Sci Rep. 2020;10:5450.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться