The influence of stereoscopic vision on surgical performance in minimal invasive surgery-a substudy of the IDOSP-Study (Influence of 3D- vs. 4 K-Display Systems on Surgical Performance in minimal invasive surgery)

Caroline Gietzelt, Rabi Datta, Jana Busshoff, Thomas Bruns, Roger Wahba, Andrea Hedergott, Caroline Gietzelt, Rabi Datta, Jana Busshoff, Thomas Bruns, Roger Wahba, Andrea Hedergott

Abstract

Purpose: This study is a secondary analysis of the IDOSP trial published in the Annals of Surgery 2020. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of stereo acuity on surgical performance in a laparoscopic training parkour with 3D- versus 4 K-2D-display technique.

Methods: The surgical performance of medical students (MS), non-board-certified surgeons (NBC), and board-certified surgeons (BC) was compared using 3D- versus 4 K-2D-display technique at a training parkour in a randomized cross-over trial. Stereo acuity was tested by TNO and Titmus Stereo tests.

Results: Eighty-nine participants were included in this sub-trial. The median stereo acuity for all participants, measured with the Titmus test, was 25 s arc, with TNO test 30 s arc. Higher quality stereo vision, measured with the Titmus test, correlated significantly with a reduced parkour time (r = 0.26, p = 0.02) and error (r = 0.21, p = 0.048) with the 3D screen. The TNO test did not correlate significantly with parkour performance. There was no statistically significant correlation between parkour time nor error and stereo acuity using the 4 K system (p > 0.457 respectively). Higher age showed a significant correlation with lower stereo acuity measured with TNO (r = 0.21, p = 0.014), but not with the Titmus test (r = - 0.7, p = 0.39). Seven percent of the group "NBC and BC" showed reduced stereo acuity > 120 s arc with the Titmus test and 3% with the TNO test.

Conclusion: High-quality stereo vision is of utmost importance for surgical skills using a 3D-display system. This was most obvious for MS and for tasks that place particularly high demands on hand-eye coordination. The Titmus test was more precise than the TNO test to predict the benefit of a 3D monitor system. Experience and fine motor skills could partly compensate for a poorer stereo acuity.

Trial registration: This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (trial number: NCT03445429, registered February 26, 2018).

Keywords: 3D; 4 K; Laparoscopic; Minimal invasive surgery; Stereo vision; Surgical performance.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scatter plots showing the correlation between stereo acuity measured by the Titmus or TNO test with parkour time and error
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boxplots of 4 K-2D (blue) versus 3D (green) median overall parkour time and error for three Titmus and for three TNO stereo subgroups: subgroup 1 with 25 s arc or better, subgroup 2 with > 25 to 40 s arc, and subgroup 3 with 50 s arc and worse
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A The TNO stereo test uses a random dot pattern and requires anaglyph red and green glasses (worn over prescription glasses). The test contains several plates with concealed test items (disks with a sector missing) that only can be seen with binocular vision. Plates V–VII were used for the determination of stereoscopic sensitivity. Measure disparity values were 480, 240, 120, 60, 30, and 15 s of arc. B The Titmus stereo test is a contour stereo test; images are separated horizontally in order to present figures to each eye. This test requires cross-polarized filters (worn over prescription glasses). The second part of the test (circles) was used for the determination of stereoscopic vision. Subjects with stereo vision can see one out of four circles per object coming forward. Measure disparity values were 400, 200, 160, 100, 63, 50, 40, 32, 25, and 20 s of arc

References

    1. O’Connor AR, Birch EE, Anderson S, Draper H, Group FR The functional significance of stereopsis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(4):2019–2023. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4434.
    1. Bloch E, Uddin N, Gannon L, Rantell K, Jain S. The effects of absence of stereopsis on performance of a simulated surgical task in two-dimensional and three-dimensional viewing conditions. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(2):240–245. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304517.
    1. Gentileschi P, Di Paola M, Catarci M, Santoro E, Montemurro L, Carlini M, Nanni E, Alessandroni L, Angeloni R, Benini B, Cristini F, Dalla Torre A, De Stefano C, Gatto A, Gossetti F, Manfroni S, Mascagni P, Masoni L, Montalto G, Polito D, Puce E, Silecchia G, Terenzi A, Valle M, Vita S, Zanarini T. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a 1994–2001 audit on 13,718 operations in the area of Rome. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(2):232–236. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8815-4.
    1. Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J, Russell RC, Darzi A. The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(11):1087–1092. doi: 10.1007/s004649901179.
    1. Sorensen SM, Savran MM, Konge L, Bjerrum F. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(1):11–23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4189-7.
    1. Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(5):1454–1460. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2055-9.
    1. Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Francis NK, Bonino MA, Curtis NJ, Amparore D, Arolfo S, Barberio M, Boni L, Brodie R, Bouvy N, Cassinotti E, Carus T, Checcucci E, Custers P, Diana M, Jansen M, Jaspers J, Marom G, Momose K, Müller-Stich BP, Nakajima K, Nickel F, Perretta S, Porpiglia F, Sánchez-Margallo F, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Schijven M, Silecchia G, Passera R, Mintz Y. The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(10):3251–3274. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06612-x.
    1. Cumming BG, DeAngelis GC. The physiology of stereopsis. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:203–238. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.203.
    1. Birch EEOC. Anna . Binocular vision. In: Lambert SRL, Christopher J, editors. Taylor and Hoyt’s pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus. Edinburgh, London, New York, Oxford, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Sydney, Toronto: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 746–749.
    1. Vancleef K, Read JCA, Herbert W, Goodship N, Woodhouse M, Serrano-Pedraza I. Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37(4):507–520. doi: 10.1111/opo.12371.
    1. Mireskandari K, Garnham L, Sheard R, Ezra E, Gregor ZJ, Sloper JJ. A prospective study of the effect of a unilateral macular hole on sensory and motor binocular function and recovery following successful surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(10):1320–1324. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.042093.
    1. Wahba R, Datta R, Busshoff J, Bruns T, Hedergott A, Gietzelt C, Dieplinger G, Fuchs H, Morgenstern B, Moller D, Hellmich M, Bruns CJ, Stippel DL. 3D versus 4K display system - Influence of “State-of-the-art”-Display Technique on Surgical Performance (IDOSP-study) in minimally invasive surgery: a randomized cross-over trial. Ann Surg. 2020;272(5):709–714. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004328.
    1. Wahba R, Datta RR, Hedergott A, Busshoff J, Bruns T, Kleinert R, Dieplinger G, Fuchs H, Gietzelt C, Moller D, Hellmich M, Bruns CJ, Stippel DL. 3D vs. 4K display system - Influence of “State-of-the-art”-Display Technique On Surgical Performance (IDOSP-Study) in minimally invasive surgery: protocol for a randomized cross-over trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3330-7.
    1. Deepa BMS, Valarmathi A, Benita S. Assessment of stereo acuity levels using random dot stereo acuity chart in college students. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(12):3850–3853. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_755_19.
    1. Julesz B. Stereoscopic vision. Vision Res. 1986;26(9):1601–1612. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90178-1.
    1. Mowforth P, Mayhew JE, Frisby JP. Vergence eye movements made in response to spatial-frequency-filtered random-dot stereograms. Perception. 1981;10(3):299–304. doi: 10.1068/p100299.
    1. Biddle M, Hamid S, Ali N. An evaluation of stereoacuity (3D vision) in practising surgeons across a range of surgical specialities. Surgeon. 2014;12(1):7–10. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.05.002.
    1. Fergo C, Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Rosenberg J. Age is highly associated with stereo blindness among surgeons: a cross-sectional study. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(11):4889–4894. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4826-9.
    1. Garnham L, Sloper JJ. Effect of age on adult stereoacuity as measured by different types of stereotest. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(1):91–95. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.077719.
    1. Tuna MB, Kilavuzoglu AE, Mourmouris P, Argun OB, Doganca T, Obek C, Ozisik O, Kural AR (2020) Impact of refractive errors on Da Vinci SI robotic system. JSLS 24 (3). 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00031
    1. Suleman R, Yang T, Paige J, Chauvin S, Alleyn J, Brewer M, Johnson SI, Hoxsey RJ. Hand-eye dominance and depth perception effects in performance on a basic laparoscopic skills set. JSLS. 2010;14(1):35–40. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12674612014428.
    1. Barry GP, Simon JW, Auringer D, Dunnican W, Zobal-Ratner J. Performance of strabismic subjects using a validated surgical training module: a pilot study. J AAPOS. 2009;13(4):350–353. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.05.002.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться