Feasibility of using ultra-high field (7 T) MRI for clinical surgical targeting
Yuval Duchin, Aviva Abosch, Essa Yacoub, Guillermo Sapiro, Noam Harel, Yuval Duchin, Aviva Abosch, Essa Yacoub, Guillermo Sapiro, Noam Harel
Abstract
The advantages of ultra-high magnetic field (7 Tesla) MRI for basic science research and neuroscience applications have proven invaluable. Structural and functional MR images of the human brain acquired at 7 T exhibit rich information content with potential utility for clinical applications. However, (1) substantial increases in susceptibility artifacts, and (2) geometrical distortions at 7 T would be detrimental for stereotactic surgeries such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), which typically use 1.5 T images for surgical planning. Here, we explore whether these issues can be addressed, making feasible the use of 7 T MRI to guide surgical planning. Twelve patients with Parkinson's disease, candidates for DBS, were scanned on a standard clinical 1.5 T MRI and a 7 T MRI scanner. Qualitative and quantitative assessments of global and regional distortion were evaluated based on anatomical landmarks and transformation matrix values. Our analyses show that distances between identical landmarks on 1.5 T vs. 7 T, in the mid-brain region, were less than one voxel, indicating a successful co-registration between the 1.5 T and 7 T images under these specific imaging parameter sets. On regional analysis, the central part of the brain showed minimal distortion, while inferior and frontal areas exhibited larger distortion due to proximity to air-filled cavities. We conclude that 7 T MR images of the central brain regions have comparable distortions to that observed on a 1.5 T MRI, and that clinical applications targeting structures such as the STN, are feasible with information-rich 7 T imaging.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: Essa Yacoub is currently a PLoS ONE Editorial Board member. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Figures
References
- Kerchner GA. Ultra-high field 7 T MRI: a new tool for studying Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26(Suppl 3):91–95.
- Lotfipour AK, Wharton S, Schwarz ST, Gontu V, Schafer A, et al. High resolution magnetic susceptibility mapping of the substantia nigra in Parkinson's disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35:48–55.
- Metzger CD, Eckert U, Steiner J, Sartorius A, Buchmann JE, et al. High field FMRI reveals thalamocortical integration of segregated cognitive and emotional processing in mediodorsal and intralaminar thalamic nuclei. Front Neuroanat. 2010;4:138.
- Yacoub E, Harel N, Ugurbil K. High-field fMRI unveils orientation columns in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:10607–10612.
- Harel N, Lin J, Moeller S, Ugurbil K, Yacoub E. Combined imaging-histological study of cortical laminar specificity of fMRI signals. Neuroimage. 2006;29:879–887.
- Duyn JH, van Gelderen P, Li TQ, de Zwart JA, Koretsky AP, et al. High-field MRI of brain cortical substructure based on signal phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:11796–11801.
- Lenglet C, Abosch A, Yacoub E, De Martino F, Sapiro G, Harel N. Comprehensive in vivo Mapping of the Human Basal Ganglia and Thalamic Connectome in Individuals Using 7 T MRI. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29153.
- Cho ZH, Min HK, Oh SH, Han JY, Park CW, et al. Direct visualization of deep brain stimulation targets in Parkinson disease with the use of 7-tesla magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg. 2010;113:639–647.
- Abosch A, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K, Harel N. An assessment of current brain targets for deep brain stimulation surgery with susceptibility-weighted imaging at 7 tesla. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:1745–1756; discussion 1756.
- Patel NK, Khan S, Gill SS. Comparison of atlas- and magnetic-resonance-imaging-based stereotactic targeting of the subthalamic nucleus in the surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2008;86:153–161.
- Starr PA, Vitek JL, DeLong M, Bakay RA. Magnetic resonance imaging-based stereotactic localization of the globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus. Neurosurgery. 1999;44:303–313; discussion 313–304.
- Richter EO, Hoque T, Halliday W, Lozano AM, Saint-Cyr JA. Determining the position and size of the subthalamic nucleus based on magnetic resonance imaging results in patients with advanced Parkinson disease. J Neurosurg. 2004;100:541–546.
- Ashkan K, Blomstedt P, Zrinzo L, Tisch S, Yousry T, et al. Variability of the subthalamic nucleus: the case for direct MRI guided targeting. Br J Neurosurg. 2007;21:197–200.
- Haddar D, Haacke E, Sehgal V, Delproposto Z, Salamon G, et al. [Susceptibility weighted imaging. Theory and applications]. J Radiol. 2004;85:1901–1908.
- Manova ES, Habib CA, Boikov AS, Ayaz M, Khan A, et al. Characterizing the mesencephalon using susceptibility-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:569–574.
- Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng YC, Reichenbach JR. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:612–618.
- Dammann P, Kraff O, Wrede KH, Ozkan N, Orzada S, et al. Evaluation of hardware-related geometrical distortion in structural MRI at 7 Tesla for image-guided applications in neurosurgery. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:910–916.
- Wang D, Doddrell DM. Geometric Distortion in Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Current Medical Imaging Reviews. 2005;1:49–60.
- Rodriguez RL, Fernandez HH, Haq I, Okun MS. Pearls in patient selection for deep brain stimulation. Neurologist. 2007;13:253–260.
- Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20:45–57.
- Woolrich MW, Jbabdi S, Patenaude B, Chappell M, Makni S, et al. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. Neuroimage. 2009;45:S173–186.
- Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage. 2004;23(Suppl 1):S208–219.
- Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17:143–155.
- Jenkinson M, Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal. 2001;5:143–156.
- Pluim JPW, Maintz JBA, Viergever MA. Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: A survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22:986–1004.
- Pitiot A, Bardinet E, Thompson PM, Malandain G. Piecewise affine registration of biological images for volume reconstruction. Med Image Anal. 2006;10:465–483.
- Robitaille P-M, Berliner LJ. Ultra high-field magnetic resonance imaging. New York, NY: Springer; 2006. pp. 249–284.
- Gerdes JS, Hitchon PW, Neerangun W, Torner JC. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in stereotactic localization. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1994;63:124–129.
- Fitzpatrick JM, Hill DL, Shyr Y, West J, Studholme C, et al. Visual assessment of the accuracy of retrospective registration of MR and CT images of the brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17:571–585.
- Aganj I, Lenglet C, Yacoub E, Sapiro G, Harel N. A 3D wavelet fusion approach for the reconstruction of isotropic-resolution MR images from orthogonal anisotropic-resolution scans. Magn Reson Med. 2012;Apr;67(4):1167–72.
Source: PubMed