Digital Health Intervention to Increase Health Knowledge Related to Diseases of High Public Health Concern in Iringa, Tanzania: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Christine Holst, Felix Sukums, Bernard Ngowi, Lien My Diep, Tewodros Aragie Kebede, Josef Noll, Andrea Sylvia Winkler, Christine Holst, Felix Sukums, Bernard Ngowi, Lien My Diep, Tewodros Aragie Kebede, Josef Noll, Andrea Sylvia Winkler

Abstract

Background: Traditionally, health promotion and health education have been provided to communities in the global south in the form of leaflets or orally by health care workers. Digital health interventions (DHIs) such as digital health messages accessed by smartphones have the potential to reach more people at a lower cost and to contribute to strengthening of health care systems. The DHI in this study focuses on disseminating digital health education regarding 3 disease complexes of high public health concern: HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and Taenia solium (neuro)cysticercosis or taeniasis, a parasitic zoonotic disease that requires a One Health approach. The DHI presents the participants with animated health videos (animations) and provides access to information spots (InfoSpots) with a free-of-charge digital health platform containing messages about health to rural Tanzanian communities.

Objective: The objective of this study is to measure the effect of the DHI on health knowledge uptake and retention over time in the rural communities.

Methods: This is a mixed methods study including a nonrandomized controlled trial and qualitative interviews conducted in rural Tanzania. A health platform containing digital health messages for the communities was developed prior to the study. The health messages consist of text, pictures, quizzes, and animations of everyday stories, aimed at disease prevention and early treatment. The baseline and immediate postintervention assessments were completed in Iringa, Tanzania in May 2019. The participants were interviewed by enumerators and completed questionnaires regarding health knowledge. Participants in the intervention group were exposed to 3 different health animations once on a tablet device. The participants' health knowledge was assessed again immediately after the exposure. The first follow-up survey was undertaken in August 2019. The InfoSpots with the digital health platform were thereafter launched in the intervention villages in November 2019. Qualitative interviews were undertaken in February 2020. The second follow-up was completed in June 2020.

Results: A total of 600 participants have been enrolled in the trial. We will assess (1) the difference in knowledge scores between baseline and the immediate postintervention assessments in the intervention group and (2) the difference in knowledge scores between the intervention and control groups at baseline, 3 and 6 months post-DHI rollout. Since a randomized design did not prove feasible, potential confounders (eg, age, gender, education, and time of exposure) may be introduced, and results will be adjusted. Data analysis for the 35 qualitative interviews is currently ongoing, and perspectives and experiences related to use and nonuse of the InfoSpots are being explored.

Conclusions: The data have been collected, and the analysis is ongoing in this digital health study, aimed at evaluating the effects of a DHI based on relevant health messages. The publications of results can be expected this year.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03808597; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03808597.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR1-10.2196/25128.

Keywords: DigI; HIV/AIDS; Tanzania; digital health; digital health education; digital health messages; digital health promotion; eHealth; mHealth; tuberculosis.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Christine Holst, Felix Sukums, Bernard Ngowi, Lien My Diep, Tewodros Aragie Kebede, Josef Noll, Andrea Sylvia Winkler. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 22.04.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participants from the respective groups, villages, and subvillages.

References

    1. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International. 2000;15(3):259–267. doi: 10.1093/heapro/15.3.259.
    1. Education for health: a manual on health education in primary health care. World Health Organization. 1988. [2021-02-17]. .
    1. Kumar S, Preetha G. Health promotion: an effective tool for global health. Indian J Community Med. 2012 Jan;37(1):5–12. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.94009.
    1. The 1st International Conference on Health Promotion, Ottawa, 1986. World Health Organization. 1986. [2021-02-17].
    1. Nutbeam D. Health Promotion Glossary. Health Promotion International. 1998 Jan 01;13(4):349–364. doi: 10.1093/heapro/13.4.349. p. 10.
    1. Health literacy: The solid facts. World Health Organization. 2013. [2021-02-17]. .
    1. Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, Brand H, (HLS-EU) Consortium Health Literacy Project European Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 25;12:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80.
    1. Morony S, Lamph E, Muscat D, Nutbeam D, Dhillon HM, Shepherd H, Smith S, Khan A, Osborne J, Meshreky W, Luxford K, Hayen A, McCaffery KJ. Improving health literacy through adult basic education in Australia. Health Promot Int. 2018 Oct 01;33(5):867–877. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax028.
    1. Huang S, Kuo S, Tsai P, Tsai C, Chen S, Lin C, Lin P, Hou W. Effectiveness of Tailored Rehabilitation Education in Improving the Health Literacy and Health Status of Postoperative Patients With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancer Nurs. 2020;43(1):E38–E46. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000665.
    1. Uemura K, Yamada M, Okamoto H. Effects of Active Learning on Health Literacy and Behavior in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Sep;66(9):1721–1729. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15458.
    1. Shen Y, Wang TT, Gao M, Hu K, Zhu XR, Zhang X, Wang FB, He C, Sun XY. [Effectiveness evaluation of health belief model-based health education intervention for patients with hypertension in community settings] Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 06;54(2):155–159. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2020.02.008.
    1. Kountz DS. Strategies for improving low health literacy. Postgrad Med. 2009 Sep;121(5):171–7. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2009.09.2065.
    1. HIV/AIDS key facts. World Health Organization. [2021-02-17]. .
    1. Global HIV & AIDS statistics — 2020 fact sheet. UNAIDS. [2021-02-17]. .
    1. Global Tuberculosis Report 2019. World Health Organization. 2019. [2021-02-17]. .
    1. Winkler AS. Neurocysticercosis in sub-Saharan Africa: a review of prevalence, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and management. Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Sep;106(5):261–74. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000047.
    1. Ngowi HA, Winkler AS, Braae UC, Mdegela RH, Mkupasi EM, Kabululu ML, Lekule FP, Johansen MV. Taenia solium taeniosis and cysticercosis literature in Tanzania provides research evidence justification for control: A systematic scoping review. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0217420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217420.
    1. Sixty-sixth world health assembly. World Health Organization. 2013. [2021-02-17]. .
    1. Tanzania HIV Impact Survey (THIS): a population-based HIV impact assessment 2016-2017. Government of Tanzania. 2019. Jan, [2021-02-17]. .
    1. TB Prevalence in Tanzania. The National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme (NTLP) [2021-02-17].
    1. Rimal RN, Lapinski MK. Why health communication is important in public health. Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Apr;87(4):247–247a. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.056713.
    1. Aranda-Jan CB, Mohutsiwa-Dibe N, Loukanova S. Systematic review on what works, what does not work and why of implementation of mobile health (mHealth) projects in Africa. BMC Public Health. 2014 Feb 21;14:188. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-188.
    1. Classification of digital health interventions v1.0: a shared language to describe the uses of digital technology for health. World Health Organization. 2018. [2021-04-04].
    1. eHealth at WHO. World Health Organization. [2021-01-15].
    1. Fast-forward progress: Leveraging tech to achieve the global goals. International Telecommunication Union (ITU) 2017. [2021-01-15]. .
    1. WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. World Health Organization. 2019. [2021-02-17]. .
    1. Hall CS, Fottrell E, Wilkinson S, Byass P. Assessing the impact of mHealth interventions in low- and middle-income countries--what has been shown to work? Glob Health Action. 2014;7:25606. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.25606.
    1. Sustainable Development Goals: Goal 3 Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. United Nations. [2021-01-15].
    1. Silva Costa A, Arriaga M, Veloso Mendes R, Miranda D, Barbosa P, Sakellarides C, Peralta A, Ambrósio Lopes N, Roque C, Ribeiro S. A Strategy for the Promotion of Health Literacy in Portugal, Centered around the Life-Course Approach: The Importance of Digital Tools. Port J Public Health. 2019 Jun 4;37(1):50–54. doi: 10.1159/000500247.
    1. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. J Med Internet Res. 2006 Jun 16;8(2):e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9.
    1. The Mobile Economy Sub-Saharan Africa. GSMA. 2018. [2021-01-15]. .
    1. The impact of mobile money interoperability in Tanzania. GSMA. 2016. [2021-01-15]. .
    1. Triggering mobile internet use in Côte d’Ivoire and Tanzania. GSMA. 2018. [2021-01-15]. .
    1. Health information dashboard. Non-discriminating access for Digital Inclusion (DigI project) [2021-01-13]. .
    1. About Digital Inclusion (DigI) Basic Internet Foundation. [2021-01-15]. .
    1. Holst C, Isabwe G, Sukums F, Ngowi H, Kajuna F, Radovanovic D, Mansour W, Mwakapeje E, Cardellichio P, Ngowi B, Noll J, Winkler A. Multidisciplinary Approach to the Development of Digital Health Messages for Rural Populations in Tanzania. JMIR Preprints. 2021:25558. doi: 10.2196/preprints.25558.
    1. Radovanović D, Holst C, Belur S, Srivastava R, Houngbonon G, Le Quentrec E, Miliza J, Winkler A, Noll J. Digital Literacy Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Development. SI. 2020 May 14;8(2):151–167. doi: 10.17645/si.v8i2.2587. doi: 10.17645/si.v8i2.2587.
    1. Rural population (% of total population) - Tanzania. The World Bank. [2021-02-17]. .
    1. Tanzania: Regions and Cities. City Population. [2021-02-17].
    1. Tanzania Country Climate Risk Profile Series: Iringa District. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), CARE Tanzania. 2019. [2021-02-17]. .
    1. Iringa Regional Report. FinScope Tanzania. 2017. [2021-02-17]. .
    1. Sikira A, Kashaigili J. Gendered Access and Control Over Land and Water Resources in the Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania. JNRD. 2016 Dec 01;6:108–117. doi: 10.5027/jnrd.v6i0.12.
    1. 2012 Population and Housing Census. The United Republic of Tanzania National Bureau of Statistics. [2021-01-15]. .
    1. Lavrakas PJ, editor. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Washington, DC: SAGE Research Methods; 2008. Probability Proportional to Size (PPS) Sampling; p. 1.
    1. Lavrakas PJ, editor. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Washington, DC: SAGE Research Methods; 2008. Kish Selection Method; p. 1.
    1. Kish L. A Procedure for Objective Respondent Selection within the Household. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1949 Sep;44(247):380–387. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1949.10483314.
    1. Services for sensitive data (TSD) University of Oslo. [2021-01-15]. .
    1. Mwidunda SA, Carabin H, Matuja WBM, Winkler AS, Ngowi HA. A school based cluster randomised health education intervention trial for improving knowledge and attitudes related to Taenia solium cysticercosis and taeniasis in Mbulu district, northern Tanzania. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0118541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118541.
    1. KoBoCollect. Google Play. 2018. [2021-01-15]. .
    1. Data Collection Tools for Challenging Environments. KoBoToolbox. 2017. [2021-01-15].
    1. Crang M, Cook I. Doing Ethnographies. London: SAGE Publications; 2007. Interviewing; pp. 60–89.
    1. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105–12. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
    1. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd Edition. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications; 2011.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться