Community- and mHealth-based integrated management of diabetes in primary healthcare in Rwanda (D²Rwanda): the protocol of a mixed-methods study including a cluster randomised controlled trial

Charilaos Lygidakis, Jean Paul Uwizihiwe, Per Kallestrup, Michela Bia, Jeanine Condo, Claus Vögele, Charilaos Lygidakis, Jean Paul Uwizihiwe, Per Kallestrup, Michela Bia, Jeanine Condo, Claus Vögele

Abstract

Introduction: In Rwanda, diabetes mellitus prevalence is estimated between 3.1% and 4.3%. To address non-communicable diseases and the shortage of health workforce, the Rwandan Ministry of Health has introduced the home-based care practitioners (HBCPs) programme: laypeople provide longitudinal care to chronic patients after receiving a six-month training. Leveraging technological mobile solutions may also help improve health and healthcare. The D²Rwanda study aims at: (a) determining the efficacy of an integrated programme for the management of diabetes in Rwanda, which will provide monthly patient assessments by HBCPs, and an educational and self-management mHealth patient tool, and; (b) exploring qualitatively the ways the interventions will have been enacted, their challenges and effects, and changes in the patients' health behaviours and HBCPs' work satisfaction.

Methods and analysis: This is a mixed-methods sequential explanatory study. First, there will be a one-year cluster randomised controlled trial including two interventions ((1) HBCPs' programme; (2) HBCPs' programme + mobile health application) and usual care (control). Currently, nine hospitals run the HBCPs' programme. Under each hospital, administrative areas implementing the HBCPs' programme will be randomised to receive intervention 1 or 2. Eligible patients from each area will receive the same intervention. Areas without the HBCPs' programme will be assigned to the control group. The primary outcome will be changes in glycated haemoglobin. Secondary outcomes include medication adherence, mortality, complications, health-related quality of life, diabetes-related distress and health literacy. Second, at the end of the trial, focus group discussions will be conducted with patients and HBCPs. Financial support was received from the Karen Elise Jensens Fond, and the Universities of Aarhus and Luxembourg.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was obtained from the Rwanda National Ethics Committee and the Ethics Review Panel of the University of Luxembourg. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT03376607; Pre-results.

Keywords: information technology; primary care; public health; telemedicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cluster randomisation of the trial. HBCP, home-based care practitioner; P, patient.

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018.
    1. International Diabetes Federation (IDF). IDF Diabetes Atlas. 8th edn Brussels, 2017.
    1. Mbanya JC, Assah FK, Saji J, et al. . Obesity and type 2 diabetes in Sub-Sahara Africa. Curr Diab Rep 2014;14:501 10.1007/s11892-014-0501-5
    1. Gill GV, Mbanya JC, Ramaiya KL, et al. . A sub-Saharan African perspective of diabetes. Diabetologia 2009;52:8–16. 10.1007/s00125-008-1167-9
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Global report on diabetes. Geneva, 2016.
    1. Hall V, Thomsen RW, Henriksen O, et al. . Diabetes in Sub Saharan Africa 1999-2011: epidemiology and public health implications. A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2011;11:564 10.1186/1471-2458-11-564
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO STEPwise approach to Surveillance (STEPS). 2013. .
    1. Tapela N. Diabetes in Rural Rwanda: high retention and positive outcomes after 24 months of follow-up in the setting of chronic care integration. International Journal of Diabetes and Clinical Research 2016;3 10.23937/2377-3634/1410058
    1. Mauvais-Jarvis F, Sobngwi E, Porcher R, et al. . Ketosis-Prone Type 2 diabetes in patients of Sub-Saharan African Origin. Diabetes 2004;53:645–53.
    1. Niessen LW, Mohan D, Akuoku JK, et al. . Tackling socioeconomic inequalities and non-communicable diseases in low-income and middle-income countries under the Sustainable Development agenda. Lancet 2018;391:2036–46. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30482-3
    1. Lygidakis H, McLoughlin C, Patel K. Achieving Universal health coverage: technology for innovative primary health care education: World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA), iheed, 2016.
    1. Atun R, Davies JI, Gale EAM, et al. . Diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa: from clinical care to health policy. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;5:622–67. 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30181-X
    1. Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS, Ramasamy J. Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2013;12:14 10.1186/2251-6581-12-14
    1. Bagonza J, Rutebemberwa E, Bazeyo W. Adherence to anti diabetic medication among patients with diabetes in eastern Uganda; a cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:168 10.1186/s12913-015-0820-5
    1. Cramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1218–24. 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1218
    1. Gazmararian JA, Ziemer DC, Barnes C. Perception of barriers to self-care management among diabetic patients. Diabetes Educ 2009;35:778–88. 10.1177/0145721709338527
    1. Habte BM, Kebede T, Fenta TG, et al. . Barriers and facilitators to adherence to anti-diabetic medications: Ethiopian patients' perspectives. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 2017;9:e1–9. 10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1411
    1. Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, et al. . Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA 2002;288:475–82. 10.1001/jama.288.4.475
    1. World Health Organization. Global health workforce statistics database. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2017.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Health workforce requirements for universal health coverage and the sustainable development goals: World Health Organization, 2016.
    1. Mukeshimana MM, Nkosi ZZ. Communities' knowledge and perceptions of type two diabetes mellitus in Rwanda: a questionnaire survey. J Clin Nurs 2014;23:541–9. 10.1111/jocn.12199
    1. Amendezo E, Walker Timothy D, Karamuka V, et al. . Effects of a lifestyle education program on glycemic control among patients with diabetes at Kigali University Hospital, Rwanda: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2017;126:129–37. 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.02.001
    1. Braun R, Catalani C, Wimbush J, et al. . Community health workers and mobile technology: a systematic review of the literature. PLoS One 2013;8:e65772 10.1371/journal.pone.0065772
    1. Consulting VW. mHealth for development: the opportunity of mobile technology for healthcare in the developing world. Washington, D.C, 2009.
    1. Nundy S, Dick JJ, Chou CH, et al. . Mobile phone diabetes project led to improved glycemic control and net savings for Chicago plan participants. Health Aff 2014;33:265–72. 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0589
    1. Stephani V, Opoku D, Quentin W, et al. . A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of mHealth interventions against non-communicable diseases in developing countries. BMC Public Health 2016;16:572 10.1186/s12889-016-3226-3
    1. Opoku D, Stephani V, Quentin W. A realist review of mobile phone-based health interventions for non-communicable disease management in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Med 2017;15:24 10.1186/s12916-017-0782-z
    1. Poushter J. Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. 2016.
    1. Zhao J, Freeman B, Li M. Can mobile phone apps influence people’s health behavior change? An evidence review. J Med Internet Res 2016;18:e287 10.2196/jmir.5692
    1. Nundy S, Mishra A, Hogan P, et al. . How do mobile phone diabetes programs drive behavior change? Evidence from a mixed methods observational cohort study. Diabetes Educ 2014;40:806–19. 10.1177/0145721714551992
    1. Riley WT, Rivera DE, Atienza AA, et al. . Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? Transl Behav Med 2011;1:53–71. 10.1007/s13142-011-0021-7
    1. Adu MD, Malabu UH, Callander EJ, et al. . Considerations for the development of mobile phone apps to support diabetes self-management: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;6:e10115 10.2196/10115
    1. Dunton GF, Atienza AA. The need for time-intensive information in healthful eating and physical activity research: a timely topic. J Am Diet Assoc 2009;109:30–5. 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.019
    1. Nundy S, Dick JJ, Solomon MC, et al. . Developing a behavioral model for mobile phone-based diabetes interventions. Patient Educ Couns 2013;90:125–32. 10.1016/j.pec.2012.09.008
    1. Nundy S, Dick JJ, Goddu AP, et al. . Using mobile health to support the chronic care model: developing an institutional initiative. Int J Telemed Appl 2012;2012:1–8. 10.1155/2012/871925
    1. Kebede MM, Liedtke TP, Möllers T, et al. . Characterizing active ingredients of ehealth interventions targeting persons with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus using the behavior change techniques taxonomy: scoping review. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e348 10.2196/jmir.7135
    1. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. . The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med 2013;46:81–95. 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
    1. Wallis L, Blessing P, Dalwai M, et al. . Integrating mHealth at point of care in low- and middle-income settings: the system perspective. Glob Health Action 2017;10:1327686 10.1080/16549716.2017.1327686
    1. Nelson LA, Mulvaney SA, Johnson KB, et al. . mHealth intervention elements and user characteristics determine utility: a mixed-methods analysis. Diabetes Technol Ther 2017;19:9–17. 10.1089/dia.2016.0294
    1. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 1989;13:319–40. 10.2307/249008
    1. Ministry of Health (MOH). Health Sector Annual Report: July 2015-June 2016. Kigali. 2016. .
    1. GSMA. The mobile economy: Sub Saharan Africa 2014. London, United Kingdom: GSMA, 2014.
    1. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) [Rwanda], Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda], ICF International. Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey 2014-15. Rockville, Maryland, USA: NISR, MOH, and ICF International, 2015.
    1. Rwanda Utilities Regulatory Authority (RURA). RURA Annual Report 2017 - 2018. 2018. (Accessed 15 Nov 2018).
    1. Internet Subscribers per category as of June 2018. Rwanda utilities regulatory authority (RURA). 2018. .
    1. Asiimwe-kateera B, Condo J, Ndagijimana A, et al. . Mobile Health approaches to non-communicable diseases in Rwanda. 2015;2:89–92.
    1. Schoonenboom J, Johnson RB. How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol 2017;69:107–31. 10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
    1. Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick SL. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field methods 2006;18:3–20. 10.1177/1525822X05282260
    1. López-Pelayo H, Wallace P, Segura L, et al. . A randomised controlled non-inferiority trial of primary care-based facilitated access to an alcohol reduction website (EFAR Spain): the study protocol. BMJ Open 2014;4:e007130 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007130
    1. Lygidakis C, Wallace P, Tersar C, et al. . Download your doctor: implementation of a digitally mediated personal physician presence to enhance patient engagement with a health-promoting internet application. JMIR Res Protoc 2016;5:e36 10.2196/resprot.5232
    1. Torgerson DJ. Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer? BMJ 2001;322:355–7. 10.1136/bmj.322.7282.355
    1. Morgan KL, Rubin DB. Rerandomization to improve covariate balance in experiments. Ann Stat 2012;40:1263–82. 10.1214/12-AOS1008
    1. Beverly EA, Fitzgerald S, Sitnikov L, et al. . Do older adults aged 60-75 years benefit from diabetes behavioral interventions? Diabetes Care 2013;36:1501–6. 10.2337/dc12-2110
    1. Ministry of Health of Rwanda, Rwanda Biomedical Center (RBC). National guideline for management of Non Communicable Diseases (NCDs). 2016th ed. Kigali, 2016.
    1. Boyer JG, Earp JA. The development of an instrument for assessing the quality of life of people with diabetes. Diabetes-39. Med Care 1997;35:440–53. 10.1097/00005650-199705000-00003
    1. Garratt AM, Schmidt L, Fitzpatrick R. Patient-assessed health outcome measures for diabetes: a structured review. Diabet Med 2002;19:1–11. 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00650.x
    1. Watkins K, Connell CM. Measurement of health-related QOL in diabetes mellitus. Pharmacoeconomics 2004;22:1109–26. 10.2165/00019053-200422170-00002
    1. Speight J, Reaney MD, Barnard KD. Not all roads lead to Rome-a review of quality of life measurement in adults with diabetes. Diabet Med 2009;26:315–27. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02682.x
    1. Dodson S, Good S, Osborne R. Health literacy toolkit for low- and middle-income countries: a series of information sheets to empower communities and strengthen health systems. New Delhi: World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, 2015.
    1. Svarstad BL, Chewning BA, Sleath BL, et al. . The brief medication questionnaire: a tool for screening patient adherence and barriers to adherence. Patient Educ Couns 1999;37:113–24. 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00107-4
    1. Lavsa SM, Holzworth A, Ansani NT. Selection of a validated scale for measuring medication adherence. J Am Pharm Assoc 2011;51:90–4. 10.1331/JAPhA.2011.09154
    1. Lam WY, Fresco P. Medication adherence measures: an overview. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:1–12. 10.1155/2015/217047
    1. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. . Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186–91. 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
    1. Levitt NS, Bradshaw D, Zwarenstein MF, et al. . Audit of public sector primary diabetes care in Cape Town, South Africa: high prevalence of complications, uncontrolled hyperglycaemia, and hypertension. Diabet Med 1997;14:1073–7. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199712)14:12<1073::AID-DIA498>;2-9
    1. Mash RJ, Rhode H, Zwarenstein M, et al. . Effectiveness of a group diabetes education programme in under-served communities in South Africa: a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med 2014;31:987–93. 10.1111/dme.12475
    1. Mrc CA, Clark A. Anonymising research data. Sociol J Br Sociol Assoc 2006;44:1–48.
    1. Bradway M, Carrion C, Vallespin B, et al. . mHealth Assessment: conceptualization of a global framework. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017;5:e60 10.2196/mhealth.7291
    1. Lewis TL, Wyatt JC. mHealth and mobile medical Apps: a framework to assess risk and promote safer use. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e210 10.2196/jmir.3133
    1. Vallespin B, Cornet J, Kotzeva A. Ensuring evidence-based safe and effective mHealth applications. In: Evidence-Based Health Informatics: promoting safety and efficiency through scientific methods and ethical policy. 2016.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться