N-acetylcysteine for therapy-resistant tobacco use disorder: a pilot study

Eduardo Prado, Michael Maes, Luiz Gustavo Piccoli, Marcela Baracat, Décio Sabattini Barbosa, Olavo Franco, Seetal Dodd, Michael Berk, Sandra Odebrecht Vargas Nunes, Eduardo Prado, Michael Maes, Luiz Gustavo Piccoli, Marcela Baracat, Décio Sabattini Barbosa, Olavo Franco, Seetal Dodd, Michael Berk, Sandra Odebrecht Vargas Nunes

Abstract

Introduction: N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) may have efficacy in treating tobacco use disorder (TUD) by reducing craving and smoking reward. This study examines whether treatment with NAC may have a clinical efficacy in the treatment of TUD.

Methods: A 12-week double blind randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy of NAC 3 g/day versus placebo. We recruited 34 outpatients with therapy resistant TUD concurrently treated with smoking-focused group behavioral therapy. Participants had assessments of daily cigarette use (primary outcome), exhaled carbon monoxide (CO(EXH)) (secondary outcome), and quit rates as defined by CO(EXH) < 6 ppm. Depression was measured with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Data were analyzed using conventional and modified intention-to-treat endpoint analyses.

Results: NAC treatment significantly reduced the daily number of cigarettes used (Δ mean ± SD = -10.9 ± 7.9 in the NAC-treated versus -3.2 ± 6.1 in the placebo group) and CO(EXH) (Δ mean ± SD = -10.4 ± 8.6 ppm in the NAC-treated versus -1.5 ± 4.5 ppm in the placebo group); 47.1% of those treated with NAC versus 21.4% of placebo-treated patients were able to quit smoking as defined by CO(EXH) < 6 ppm. NAC treatment significantly reduced the HDRS score in patients with tobacco use disorder.

Conclusions: These data show that treatment with NAC may have a clinical efficacy in TUD. NAC combined with appropriate psychotherapy appears to be an efficient treatment option for TUD.

Keywords: Depression; Glutathione.; Inflammation; N-Acetylcysteine; Oxidative stress; Smoking cessation.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT flow chart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The time course data for the effects of NAC versus placebo at the 4 time points (shown are the estimated marginal means with standard error). t0 = baseline, t1 = 4 weeks, t2 = 8 weeks, t3 = 12 weeks.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться