Efficacy of Long-Term Treatment with Once-Daily Baricitinib 2 mg in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis of Two 24-Week, Phase III, Randomized, Controlled Studies and One Long-Term Extension Study

Alvin F Wells, Bochao Jia, Li Xie, Guillermo J Valenzuela, Edward C Keystone, Zhanguo Li, Amanda K Quebe, Kirstin Griffing, Susan Otawa, Boulos Haraoui, Alvin F Wells, Bochao Jia, Li Xie, Guillermo J Valenzuela, Edward C Keystone, Zhanguo Li, Amanda K Quebe, Kirstin Griffing, Susan Otawa, Boulos Haraoui

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate long-term efficacy of once-daily baricitinib 2 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response (IR) to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) or biologic DMARDs (bDMARD).

Methods: Data from patients treated with baricitinib 2 mg daily in two 24-week, phase III studies, RA-BUILD (csDMARD-IR; NCT01721057) and RA-BEACON (bDMARD-IR; NCT01721044), and one long-term extension study (RA-BEYOND; NCT01885078), were analyzed (120 weeks). The main outcomes were achievement of low-disease activity (LDA; Simple Disease Activity Index [SDAI] ≤ 11), clinical remission (SDAI ≤ 3.3), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤ 0.5 and improvement from baseline of ≥ 0.22, and safety. Analysis populations included (1) all patients and (2) never-rescued patients. Completer and non-responder imputation (NRI) analyses were conducted on each population.

Results: In RA-BUILD, 684 were randomized (229 to baricitinib 2 mg, 180 of whom completed RA-BUILD and entered RA-BEYOND). In RA-BEACON, 527 were randomized (174 to baricitinib 2 mg, 117 of whom completed RA-BEACON and entered RA-BEYOND). In RA-BUILD-BEYOND, 85.1% (63/74, completer) and 27.5% (63/229, NRI) of csDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 2 mg achieved SDAI LDA; 40.5% (30/74, completer) and 13.1% (30/229, NRI) were in SDAI remission; 62.2% (46/74, completer) and 20.1% (46/229, NRI) had HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5 and 81.1% (60/74, completer); and 26.2% (60/229, NRI) achieved ≥ 0.22 change from baseline at week 120. In RA-BEACON-BEYOND, 86.5% (32/37, completer) and 18.4% (32/174, NRI) of bDMARD-IR patients treated with baricitinib 2 mg achieved SDAI LDA; 24.3% (9/37, completer) and 5.2% (9/174, NRI) were in SDAI remission; 50.0% (19/38, completer) and 10.9% (19/174, NRI) had HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5; and 73.7% (28/38, completer) and 16.1% (28/174, NRI) achieved ≥ 0.22 change from baseline at week 120. Rates of adverse events of special interest were consistent with previous reports.

Conclusions: Long-term treatment with baricitinib 2 mg demonstrated efficacy for up to 120 weeks and was well tolerated.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01721057, NCT01721044, and NCT01885078.

Keywords: Arthritis; Baricitinib; Rheumatoid.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The treatment course is described for both originating studies. aPatients enrolled in RA-BUILD had an inadequate response or intolerance to ≥ 1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and had not previously been treated with a biologic DMARD; bPatients enrolled in RA-BEACON had an inadequate response to prior treatment with ≥ 1 tumor necrosis factor inhibitor and were on stable doses of concomitant conventional DMARD therapy; cRescue treatment (baricitinib 4 mg) was assigned at week 16 for non-responders (patients whose tender and swollen joint counts had improved by less than 20% from baseline at both week 14 and week 16). After week 16, rescue was at the discretion of the investigator based on tender and swollen joint counts. Patients who completed RA-BUILD or RA-BEACON and who were receiving baricitinib 2 mg and 4 mg continued blinded treatment in the long-term extension (LTE) study. Treatment was switched to open-label baricitinib 4 mg once patients were rescued or switched from placebo upon entry to the LTE study. Please note, the focus of this manuscript was the treatment course of baricitinib 2 mg, shown in light blue; dRescue therapy was available for patients with a Clinical Disease Activity Index score > 10 at 3 months or later following the study entry; eTotal duration of the ongoing LTE study, RA-BEYOND, is 7 years
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The patient disposition for RA-BUILD describes the frequency and reasons for discontinuation in the originating study and in the long-term extension study. The percentages are calculated based on the overall modified intention-to-treat patients included in the originating study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The patient disposition for RA-BEACON describes the frequency and reasons for discontinuation in the originating study and in the long-term extension study. The percentages are calculated based on the overall modified intention-to-treat patients included in the originating study
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patients who achieved Simple Disease Activity Index ≤ 11 in RA-BUILD and RA-BEACON trials. a, b The efficacy over time based on the non-responder imputation (NRI) and completer analysis in RA-BUILD. c, d The efficacy over time based on the NRI and completer analysis in RA-BEACON
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Patients who achieved Simple Disease Activity Index ≤ 3.3 in RA-BUILD and RA-BEACON trials. a, b The efficacy over time based on the non-responder imputation (NRI) and completer analysis in RA-BUILD. c, d The efficacy over time based on the NRI and completer analysis in RA-BEACON
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Patients who reached Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤ 0.5 in RA-BUILD and RA-BEACON trials. a, b The percent of patients who met or exceeded HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5 at week 120 based on the non-responder imputation (NRI) and completer analysis in RA-BUILD. c, d The percent of patients who met or exceeded HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5 at week 120 based on the NRI and completer analysis in RA-BEACON
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Patients who achieved Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) improvement ≥ 0.22 in RA-BUILD and RA-BEACON trials. a, b The efficacy over time based on the non-responder imputation (NRI) and completer analysis in RA-BUILD. c, d The efficacy over time based on the NRI and completer analysis in RA-BEACON

References

    1. Smolen J, Steiner G. Therapeutic strategies for rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2:473–488. doi: 10.1038/nrd1109.
    1. Colmegna I, Ohata BR, Menard HA. Current understanding of rheumatoid arthritis therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91:607–620. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.325.
    1. Fridman JS, Scherle PA, Collins R, Burn TC, Li Y, Li J, et al. Selective inhibition of JAK1 and JAK2 is efficacious in rodent models of arthritis: preclinical characterization of INCB028050. J Immunol. 2010;184:5298–5307. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902819.
    1. Fleischmann R, Schiff M, van der Heijde D, Ramos-Remus C, Spindler A, Stanislav M, et al. Baricitinib, methotrexate, or combination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and no or limited prior disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:506–517. doi: 10.1002/art.39953.
    1. Taylor PC, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, Weinblatt ME, del Carmen ML, Gonzaga JR, et al. Baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:652–662. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1608345.
    1. Dougados M, van der Heijde D, Chen YC, Greenwald M, Drescher E, Liu J, et al. Baricitinib in patients with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional synthetic DMARDs: results from the RA-BUILD study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:88–95. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210094.
    1. Genovese MC, Kremer J, Zamani O, Ludivico C, Krogulec M, Xie L, et al. Baricitinib in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1243–1252. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507247.
    1. Genovese MC, Smolen JS, Takeuchi T, Burmester G, Brinker D, Rooney TP, et al. Safety profile of baricitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis over a median of 3 years treatment: an updated integrated safety analysis. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2(6):E347–E357. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30032-1.
    1. Taylor PC, Weinblatt ME, Burmester GR, Rooney TP, Witt S, Walls CD, et al. Cardiovascular safety during treatment with baricitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:1042–1055. doi: 10.1002/art.40841.
    1. Buch MH, Silva-Fernandez L, Carmona L, Aletaha D, Christensen R, Combe B, et al. Development of EULAR recommendations for the reporting of clinical trial extension studies in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:963–969. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204948.
    1. Smolen JS, Genovese MC, Takeuchi T, Hyslop DL, Macias WL, Rooney T, et al. Safety profile of baricitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with over 2 years median time in treatment. J Rheumatol. 2019;46:7–18. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.171361.
    1. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Kerschbaumer A. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;2020:22.
    1. Bykerk VP, Shadick N, Frits M, Bingham CO, III, Jeffery I, Iannaccone C, et al. Flares in rheumatoid arthritis: frequency and management. A report from the BRASS registry. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:227–234. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121521.
    1. Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Schiff MH, Kalden JR, Emery P, Eberl G, et al. A simplified disease activity index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42:244–257. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg072.
    1. Aletaha D, Nell VP, Stamm T, Uffmann M, Pflugbeil S, Machold K, et al. Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a clinical activity score. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7:R796–806. doi: 10.1186/ar1740.
    1. Prevoo ML, van ’tHof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38:44–48. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380107.
    1. Wolfe F, Michaud K, Pincus T. Development and validation of the health assessment questionnaire II: a revised version of the health assessment questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:3296–3305. doi: 10.1002/art.20549.
    1. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.
    1. van der Heijde D, Landewé RBM, Wollenhaupt J, et al. Assessment of radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tofacitinib in long-term studies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020 doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa476.
    1. Cohen SB, Tanaka Y, Mariette X, et al. Long-term safety of tofacitinib up to 9.5 years: a comprehensive integrated analysis of the rheumatoid arthritis clinical development programme. RMD Open. 2020;6(3):e001395. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001395.
    1. Álvaro-Gracia JM, García-Llorente JF, Valderrama M, et al. Update on the safety profile of tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis from clinical trials to real-world studies: a narrative review. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8(1):17–40. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00258-9.
    1. Nash P, Kerschbaumer A, Dörner T, et al. Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a consensus statement. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(1):71–87. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218398.
    1. El Jammal T, Sève P, Gerfaud-Valentin M, et al. State of the art: approved and emerging JAK inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021;22(2):205–218. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1822325.
    1. Burmester GR, Blanco R, Charles-Schoeman C, et al. Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:451–460. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61424-X.
    1. Cohen SB, Emery P, Greenwald MW, et al. Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at 24 weeks. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2793–2806. doi: 10.1002/art.22025.
    1. Emery P, Keystone E, Tony HP, et al. IL-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab improves treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor biologicals: results from a 24-week multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1516–1523. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.092932.
    1. Genovese MC, Schiff M, Luggen M, et al. Efficacy and safety of the selective co-stimulation modulator abatacept following 2 years of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:547–554. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.074773.
    1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Rheumatoid arthritis therapy reappraisal: strategies, opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11:276–289. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.8.
    1. Smolen JS, Kay J, Doyle MK, et al. Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after treatment with tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (GO-AFTER study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Lancet. 2009;374:210–221. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60506-7.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться