Frequency and Outcomes of Periprocedural MI in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI

Yasushi Ueki, Tatsuhiko Otsuka, Sarah Bär, Kostantinos C Koskinas, Dik Heg, Jonas Häner, George C M Siontis, Fabien Praz, Lukas Hunziker, Jonas Lanz, Stefan Stortecky, Thomas Pilgrim, Sylvain Losdat, Stephan Windecker, Lorenz Räber, Yasushi Ueki, Tatsuhiko Otsuka, Sarah Bär, Kostantinos C Koskinas, Dik Heg, Jonas Häner, George C M Siontis, Fabien Praz, Lukas Hunziker, Jonas Lanz, Stefan Stortecky, Thomas Pilgrim, Sylvain Losdat, Stephan Windecker, Lorenz Räber

Abstract

Background: Definitions of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) differ with respect to biomarker threshold as well as ancillary criteria for myocardial ischemia and are limited in terms of validation.

Objectives: This study evaluated the frequency and impact of periprocedural MI by using various MI definitions among patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: Between 2010 and 2018, periprocedural MIs were assessed according to the third and fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI), Academic Research Consortium-2 (ARC-2), and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) criteria based on high-sensitivity troponin in patients with CCS undergoing PCI enrolled into the Bern PCI registry. The primary endpoint was cardiac death at 1 year.

Results: Among 4,404 patients with CCS, periprocedural MI defined by the third UDMI, fourth UDMI, ARC-2, and SCAI were observed in 18.0%, 14.9%, 2.0%, and 2.0% of patients, respectively. Among patients with periprocedural MI defined by the third UDMI, fourth UDMI, ARC-2, and SCAI, cardiac mortality at 1 year was 2.9%, 3.0%, 5.8%, and 10.0%. The ARC-2 (HR: 3.90; 95% CI: 1.54-9.93) and SCAI (HR: 7.66; 95% CI: 3.64-16.11) were more relevant compared with the third UDMI (HR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.04-3.00) and fourth UDMI (HR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.11-3.37) for cardiac death at 1 year.

Conclusions: Among patients with CCS undergoing PCI, periprocedural MI defined according to the ARC-2 and SCAI criteria was 7 to 9 times less frequent compared with the third and fourth UDMI. Periprocedural MI defined by using the ARC-2 and SCAI were more prognostic for cardiac death at 1 year compared with the third and fourth UDMI. (CARDIOBASE Bern PCI Registry; NCT02241291).

Keywords: chronic coronary syndrome; coronary artery disease; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention.

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Ueki has received personal fees from Infraredx, outside the submitted work. Dr Bär has received grants from Medis Medical Imaging Systems, Bangerter-Rhyner Stiftung, and Abbott, outside the submitted work. Dr Stortecky has received grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Abbott Vascular; has received grants and personal fees from Boston Scientific; and has received personal fees from BTG, outside the submitted work. Dr Pilgrim has received grants and personal fees from Biotronik and Symetis/Boston Scientific; and has received grants from Edwards Lifesciences, outside the submitted work. Dr Windecker has received research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Bayer, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, Infraredx, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave; serves as an unpaid advisory board member and/or unpaid member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave, and Xeltis but has not received personal payments by pharmaceutical companies or device manufacturers; and is also a member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Räber has received grants and personal fees from Abbott Vascular, Sanofi, and Regeneron; has received personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Occlutech, and Vifor; and has received grants from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Infraredx, and HeartFlow, all outside the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться