A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain

Adrienne van Randen, Wytze Laméris, H Wouter van Es, Hans P M van Heesewijk, Bert van Ramshorst, Wim Ten Hove, Willem H Bouma, Maarten S van Leeuwen, Esteban M van Keulen, Patrick M Bossuyt, Jaap Stoker, Marja A Boermeester, OPTIMA Study Group, A van Randen, W Laméris, J Stoker, M A Boermeester, P M M Bossuyt, B van Ramshorst, J P M van Heesewijk, M P Gorzeman, W H Bouma, W ten Hove, J Winkelhagen, H G Gooszen, M S van Leeuwen, D E J G J Dolmans, E van Keulen, J W Juttmann, M J van der Laan, S C Donkervoort, V P M van der Hulst, Adrienne van Randen, Wytze Laméris, H Wouter van Es, Hans P M van Heesewijk, Bert van Ramshorst, Wim Ten Hove, Willem H Bouma, Maarten S van Leeuwen, Esteban M van Keulen, Patrick M Bossuyt, Jaap Stoker, Marja A Boermeester, OPTIMA Study Group, A van Randen, W Laméris, J Stoker, M A Boermeester, P M M Bossuyt, B van Ramshorst, J P M van Heesewijk, M P Gorzeman, W H Bouma, W ten Hove, J Winkelhagen, H G Gooszen, M S van Leeuwen, D E J G J Dolmans, E van Keulen, J W Juttmann, M J van der Laan, S C Donkervoort, V P M van der Hulst

Abstract

Objectives: Head-to-head comparison of ultrasound and CT accuracy in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain.

Materials and methods: Consecutive patients with abdominal pain for >2 h and <5 days referred for imaging underwent both US and CT by different radiologists/radiological residents. An expert panel assigned a final diagnosis. Ultrasound and CT sensitivity and predictive values were calculated for frequent final diagnoses. Effect of patient characteristics and observer experience on ultrasound sensitivity was studied.

Results: Frequent final diagnoses in the 1,021 patients (mean age 47; 55% female) were appendicitis (284; 28%), diverticulitis (118; 12%) and cholecystitis (52; 5%). The sensitivity of CT in detecting appendicitis and diverticulitis was significantly higher than that of ultrasound: 94% versus 76% (p < 0.01) and 81% versus 61% (p = 0.048), respectively. For cholecystitis, the sensitivity of both was 73% (p = 1.00). Positive predictive values did not differ significantly between ultrasound and CT for these conditions. Ultrasound sensitivity in detecting appendicitis and diverticulitis was not significantly negatively affected by patient characteristics or reader experience.

Conclusion: CT misses fewer cases than ultrasound, but both ultrasound and CT can reliably detect common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Ultrasound sensitivity was largely not influenced by patient characteristics and reader experience.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for subgroups of observers

References

    1. Stoker J, van Randen A, Laméris W, Boermeester MA. Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology. 2009;253:31–46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2531090302.
    1. Shuman WP, Ralls PW, Balfe DM, et al. Imaging evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain and fever. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000;215(Suppl):209–212.
    1. Puylaert JB. Ultrasonography of the acute abdomen: gastrointestinal conditions. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41:1227–1242. doi: 10.1016/S0033-8389(03)00120-9.
    1. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332.
    1. Stoker J. Magnetic resonance imaging and the acute abdomen. Br J Surg. 2008;95:1193–1194. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6378.
    1. Laméris W, van Randen A, van Es HW, et al. Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ. 2009;338:b2431. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2431.
    1. van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Ubbink DT, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology. 2008;249:97–106. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483071652.
    1. Laméris W, van Randen A, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM, Boermeester MA, Stoker J. Graded compression ultrasonography and computed tomography in acute colonic diverticulitis: meta-analysis of test accuracy. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2498–2511. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1018-6.
    1. van Randen A, Laméris W, Nio CY, et al. Inter-observer agreement for abdominal CT in unselected patients with acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1394–1407. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1294-9.
    1. Laméris W, van Randen A, Dijkgraaf MG, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Optimization of diagnostic imaging use in patients with acute abdominal pain (OPTIMA): design and rationale. BMC Emerg Med. 2007;7:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-7-9.
    1. Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Bowie JD, Carroll BA, DeLong DH, Gray L, et al. Physician training requirements in sonography: how many cases are needed for competence? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1221–1227.
    1. Cuschieri J, Florence M, Flum DR, et al. Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg. 2008;248:557–563.
    1. Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS, Bossuyt PMM (2007) Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods. Health Technol Assess 11(50)
    1. Gaitini D, Beck-Razi N, Mor-Yosef D, et al. Diagnosing acute appendicitis in adults: accuracy of color Doppler sonography and MDCT compared with surgery and clinical follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1300–1306. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2955.
    1. Anderson SW, Soto JA, Lucey BC, et al. Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1282–1288. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2336.
    1. Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2010;97:141–150. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6870.
    1. Hainaux B, Agneessens E, Bertinotti R, et al. Accuracy of MDCT in predicting site of gastrointestinal tract perforation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1179–1183. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.1179.
    1. Lazarus DE, Slywotsky C, Bennett GL, Megibow AJ, Macari M. Frequency and relevance of the “small-bowel feces” sign on CT in patients with small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1361–1366.
    1. Maglinte DD, Howard TJ, Lillemoe KD, et al. Small-bowel obstruction: state-of-the-art imaging and its role in clinical management. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:130–139. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.11.025.
    1. Schmutz GR, Benko A, Fournier L, Peron JM, Morel E, Chiche L. Small bowel obstruction: role and contribution of sonography. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:1054–1058. doi: 10.1007/s003300050251.
    1. Silva AC, Pimenta M, Guimarães LS. Small bowel obstruction: what to look for. Radiographics. 2009;29:423–439. doi: 10.1148/rg.292085514.
    1. Sheedy SP, Earnest F, Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Hoskin TL. CT of small-bowel ischemia associated with obstruction in emergency department patients: diagnostic performance evaluation. Radiology. 2006;241:729–736. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2413050965.
    1. Puylaert JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI, et al. A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:666–669. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198709103171103.
    1. Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, Kohlwes RJ. Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:537–546.
    1. Leeflang MM, Moons KG, Reitsma JB, Zwinderman AH. Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions. Clin Chem. 2008;54:729–737. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.096032.
    1. Potter AW, Chandrasekhar CA. US and CT evaluation of acute pelvic pain of gynaecologic origin in nonpregnant premenopausal patients. Radiographics. 2008;28:1645–1659. doi: 10.1148/rg.286085504.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться