Vitamin-D2 treatment-associated decrease in 25(OH)D3 level is a reciprocal phenomenon: a randomized controlled trial

Muhammad M Hammami, Kafa Abuhdeeb, Safa Hammami, Ahmed Yusuf, Muhammad M Hammami, Kafa Abuhdeeb, Safa Hammami, Ahmed Yusuf

Abstract

Background: Vitamin-D2 (D2) treatment has been associated with a decrease in 25-hydroxy (25(OH)) vitamin-D3 (D3) level, suggesting that D3 treatment would be preferred to raise total 25(OH) vitamin-D (D) level. We postulated that D2 treatment-associated decrease in 25(OH)D3 level is related to the increase in 25(OH)D level rather than being D2-specific, and thus there would be a similar D3 treatment-associated decrease in 25(OH)D2 level.

Methods: Fifty volunteers were block-randomized to 50,000 IU D2 or placebo orally once (study-1) and fifty volunteers received 50,000 IU D2 orally once and 4 days later block-randomized to 50,000 IU D3 or placebo orally once (study-2). Interventions were concealed from volunteers and research coordinators and blindly-administered. Serum 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 levels were blindly-determined at baseline and days 14, 28, 42, and 56, post-randomization by high performance liquid chromatography assay. Results of 97 participants were analyzed. Primary outcome measure was day-28 D2-associated change in 25(OH)D3 level in study-1 and D3-associated change in 25(OH)D2 level in study-2, adjusted for baseline levels.

Results: Mean (95% confidence interval) difference between the active and placebo arms in the decrease in day-28 25(OH)D3 (study-1) and 25(OH)D2 (study-2) levels was 13.2 (9.7 to 16.6) and 9.8 (5.2 to 14.4) nmol/L, respectively. Corresponding differences at day-56 were 10.8 (6.8 to 14.8) and 1.7 (- 7.6 to 11.1) nmol/L, respectively. The difference between the placebo and active arms in area-under-the-curve at day-28 (AUC28) and day-56 (AUC56) were 262.3 (197.8 to 326.7) and 605.1 (446.3 to 784.0) for 25(OH)D3 (study-1) and 282.2 (111.2 to 453.3) and 431.2 (179.3 to 683.2) nmol.d/L for 25(OH)D2 (study-2), respectively. There were significant correlations between day-28 changes in 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 levels in study-1 (rho = - 0.79, p < 0.001) and study-2 (rho = - 0.36, p = 0.01), and between day-28 changes in 25(OH)D2 level and baseline 25(OH)D level in study-2 (rho = - 0.42, p = 0.003).

Conclusions: Compared to placebo, D3 treatment is associated with a decrease in 25(OH)D2 level similar in magnitude to D2-treatment associated decrease in 25(OH)D3 level; however, the D3-placebo difference in 25(OH)D2 level is shorter-lasting. Changes in 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 levels are correlated with each other and with baseline 25 (OH) D levels, suggesting a common regulatory mechanism.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT03035084 (registered January 27, 2017).

Keywords: 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 level; 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 level; Cholecalciferol treatment; Ergocalciferol treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the KFSH&RC Research Ethics Committee (RAC 2161235). All participants provided a written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participants flow chart. One participant was excluded because of formula failure/not ingesting D2 dose (study-1, D2 arm), one withdrew for personal reasons (study-2, D3 arm), and one was excluded because of high 25(OH)D2 before receiving the 50,000 IU D2 loading dose (study-2, D3 arm)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Changes in 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 levels over 56 days. Data represent mean levels. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. a and b, study-1: participants were randomized to a single oral dose of 50,000 IU D2 (red squares) or placebo (blue diamond). c and d, study-2: participants were randomized to a single oral dose of 50,000 IU D3 (red squares) or placebo (blue diamond) four days after receiving a single oral dose of 50,000 IU D2. 25(OH)D2, 25-hydroxyvitamin D2. 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. D0, D14, D28, D42, and D56 are day of randomization, and 14, 28, 42, and 56 days after randomization, respectively
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Decrease in 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 levels from randomization to day-28 (a and c) or day-56 (b and d). Bars represent means and standard errors. a and b, study-1: participants were randomized to a single oral dose of 50,000 IU D2 (solid bars) or placebo (open bars). c and d, study-2: participants were randomized to a single oral dose of 50,000 IU D3 (solid bars) or placebo (open bars) four days after receiving a single oral dose of 50,000 IU D2. 25(OH)D2, 25-hydroxyvitamin D2. 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. *, p < 0.001
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
25(OH)D2 and 25 (OH) D3 area-under-the-curves from randomization to day-28 (AUC28) or day-56 (AUC56). Bars represent means and standard errors. a and b, study-1: participants were randomized to a single oral dose of 50,000 IU D2 (solid bars) or placebo (open bars). c and d, study-2: participants were randomized to a single oral dose of 50,000 IU D3 (solid bars) or placebo (open bars) four days after receiving a single oral dose of 50,000 IU D2. 25(OH)D2, 25-hydroxyvitamin D2. 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. *, p < 0.001. **, p < 0.005
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Correlation between changes in day-28 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 levels and baseline total 25(OH)D level. a and b, study-1: participants were randomized to a single oral dose of 50,000 IU D2 or placebo. c and d, study-2: participants were randomized to a single oral dose of 50,000 IU D3 or placebo four days after receiving a single oral dose of 50,000 IU D2. 25(OH)D2, 25-hydroxyvitamin D2. 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. 25(OH)D, total 25-hydroxyvitamin D. a, rho = − 0.79 (CI, − 0.66 to − 0.88), p < 0.001. b, rho = − 0.17 (CI, 0.12 to − 0.43), p = 0.31. c, rho = − 0.36 (CI, − 0.09 to − 0.58), p = 0.01. d, rho = − 0.42 (CI, − 0.15 to − 0.63), p = 0.003

References

    1. Bikle D. Nonclassic actions of vitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(1):26–34. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1454.
    1. Holick MF, Biancuzzo RM, Chen TC, Klein EK, Young A, Bibuld D, Reitz R, Salameh W, Ameri A, Tannenbaum AD. Vitamin D2 is as effective as vitamin D3 in maintaining circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(3):677–681. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2308.
    1. Hartwell D, Hassager C, Christiansen C. Effect of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 on the serum concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D2 in normal subjects. Acta Endocrinol. 1987;115:378–384. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1150378.
    1. Heaney RP, Recker RR, Grote J, Horst RL, Armas LA. Vitamin D(3) is more potent than vitamin D(2) in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(3):E447–E452. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2230.
    1. Armas LA, Hollis BW, Heaney RP. Vitamin D2 is much less effective than vitamin D3 in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(11):5387–5391. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0360.
    1. Gallo S, Phan A, Vanstone CA, Rodd C, Weiler HA. The change in plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D did not differ between breast-fed infants that received a daily supplement of ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol for mMonths. J Nutr. 2013;143(2):148–153. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.167858.
    1. Gordon CM, Williams AL, Feldman HA, May J, Sinclair L, Vasquez A, Cox JE. Treatment of hypovitaminosis D in infants and toddlers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(7):2716–2721. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2790.
    1. Trang HM, Cole DE, Rubin LA, Pierratos A, Siu S, Vieth R. Evidence that vitamin D3 increases serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D more efficiently than does vitamin D2. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68(4):854–858. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/68.4.854.
    1. Mazahery H, von Hurst PR. Factors affecting 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration in response to vitamin D supplementation. Nutrients. 2015;7(7):5111–5142. doi: 10.3390/nu7075111.
    1. Hammami MM, Yusuf A. Differential effects of vitamin D2 and D3 supplements on 25-hydroxyvitamin D level are dose, sex, and time dependent: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Endocr Disord. 2017;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12902-017-0163-9..
    1. Tripkovic L, Lambert H, Hart K, Smith CP, Bucca G, Penson S, Chope G, Hyppönen E, Berry J, Vieth R, Lanham-New S. Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(6):1357–1364. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.031070.
    1. Houghton LA, Vieth R. The case against ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) as a vitamin supplement. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(4):694–697. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.4.694.
    1. Romagnoli E, Mascia ML, Cipriani C, Fassino V, Mazzei F, D'Erasmo E, Carnevale V, Scillitani A, Minisola S. Short and long term variations in serum calciotropic hormones after single very large dose of ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) or cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) in the elderly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:3015–3020. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0350.
    1. Nimitphong H, Saetung S, Chanprasertyotin S, Chailurkit LO, Ongphiphadhanakul B. Changes in circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D according to vitamin D binding protein genotypes after vitamin D3 or D2 supplementation. Nutr J. 2013;12:39. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-39.
    1. Melhem SJ, Aiedeh KM, Hadidi KA. Effects of a 10-day course of a high dose calciferol versus a single mega dose of ergocalciferol in correcting vitamin D deficiency. Ann Saudi Med. 2015;35(1):13–18. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2015.13.
    1. Demetriou ET, Travison TG, Holick MF. Treatment with 50,000 IU vitamin D2 every other week and effect on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D2, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, and total 25-hydroxyvitamin D in a clinical setting. Endocr Pract. 2012;18(3):399–402. doi: 10.4158/EP11268.OR.
    1. Macdonald HM, Wood AD, Tang JCY, Fraser WD. Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in increasing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96(5):1152–1153. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.046110.
    1. Cashman KD, Kiely M, Seamans KM, Urbain P. Effect of ultraviolet light–exposed mushrooms on vitamin D status: liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry reanalysis of bio-banked sera from a randomized controlled trial and a systematic review plus meta-analysis. J Nutr. 2016;146(3):565–575. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.223784.
    1. Biancuzzo RM, Clarke N, Reitz RE, Travison TG, Holick MF. Serum concentrations of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in response to vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(3):973–979. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2114.
    1. Tjellesen L, Hummer L, Christiansen C, Rødbro P. Serum concentration of vitamin D metabolites during treatment with vitamin D2 and D3 in normal premenopausal women. Bone Miner. 1986;1(5):407–413.
    1. Mazahery H, Stonehouse W, von Hurst PR. The effect of monthly 50,000 IU or 100,000 IU vitamin D supplements on vitamin D status in premenopausal middle eastern women living in Auckland. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015;69(3):367–372. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.264.
    1. Waterhouse M, Tran B, Armstrong BK, Baxter C, Ebeling PR, English DR, Gebski V, Hill C, Kimlin MG, Lucas RM, Venn A, Webb PM, Whiteman DC, Neale RE. Environmental, personal, and genetic determinants of response to vitamin D supplementation in older adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(7):E1332–E1340. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-4101.
    1. Aterrado S, Ono G, Kanehira-Mar S, Meier J, Swislocki A. Evaluating vitamin D repletion regimens and effects in veteran patients. Ann Pharmacother. 2015;49(9):969–977. doi: 10.1177/1060028015591034.
    1. Gallagher JC, Yalamanchili V, Smith LM. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on serum 25(OH)D in thin and obese women. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;136:195–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2012.12.003.
    1. Ekwaru JP, Zwicker JD, Holick MF, Giovannucci E, Veugelers PJ. The importance of body weight for the dose response relationship of oral vitamin D supplementation and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in healthy volunteers. PLoS One 2014:5; 9(11):e111265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111265.
    1. Alvi SN, Yusuf A, Hammami MM. Simultaneous quantification of vitamin D-2, vitamin D-3, and their 25- hydroxy metabolites in human plasma by high performance liquid chromatography. J Bioequiv Availab. 2012;S14:1–5. doi: 10.4172/jbb.S14-007.
    1. . Dallal GE. Accessed 13 Jan2019.
    1. Hymøller L, Jensen SK. Vitamin D2 impairs utilization of vitamin D3 in high-yielding dairy cows in a cross-over supplementation regimen. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94(7):3462–3466. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-4111.
    1. Saliba W, Barnett-Griness O, Rennert G. The relationship between obesity and the increase in serum 25(OH)D levels in response to vitamin D supplementation. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(4):1447–1454. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2129-0.
    1. Tepper S, Shahar DR, Geva D, Ish-Shalom S. Predictors of serum 25(oh)D increase following bimonthly supplementation with 100,000IU vitamin D in healthy, men aged 25-65 years. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;144 Pt A:163–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.12.005.
    1. Møller UK, við Streym S, Jensen LT, Mosekilde L, Schoenmakers I, Nigdikar S, Rejnmark L. Increased plasma concentrations of vitamin D metabolites and vitamin D binding protein in women using hormonal contraceptives: a cross-sectional study. Nutrients. 2013;5(9):3470–3480. doi: 10.3390/nu5093470.
    1. Mulligan GB, Licata A. Taking vitamin D with the largest meal improves absorption and results in higher serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(4):928–930. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.67.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться