The feasibility of finger prick autologous blood (FAB) as a novel treatment for severe dry eye disease (DED): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Shafi Balal, Arit Udoh, Yannis Pappas, Erica Cook, Garry Barton, Ali Hassan, Karen Hayden, Rupert Richard Alexander Bourne, Sajjad Ahmad, Shahina Pardhan, Michael Harrison, Benjamin Sharma, Mohammad Wasil, Anant Sharma, Shafi Balal, Arit Udoh, Yannis Pappas, Erica Cook, Garry Barton, Ali Hassan, Karen Hayden, Rupert Richard Alexander Bourne, Sajjad Ahmad, Shahina Pardhan, Michael Harrison, Benjamin Sharma, Mohammad Wasil, Anant Sharma

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with severe dry eye disease (DED) often have limited treatment options with standard non-surgical management focused on the use of artificial tears for lubrication and anti-inflammatory drugs. However, artificial tears do not address the extraordinary complexity of human tears. Crudely, human tears with its vast constituents is essentially filtered blood. Blood and several blood-derived products including autologous serum, have been studied as tear substitutes. This study proposes to test the use of whole, fresh, autologous blood obtained from a finger prick for treatment of severe DED.

Methods and analysis: The research team at the two participating sites will approach patients with severe DED for this study. Recruitment will take place over 12 months and we expect to recruit 60 patients in total. The primary outcome of this feasibility study is to estimate the proportion of eligible patients approached who consent to and comply with study procedures including treatment regimen and completion of required questionnaires. The secondary outcome measures, although not powered for in this feasibility, include corneal inflammation (assessed by the Oxford corneal staining guide), patient pain and symptoms scores (assessed by the Ocular Surface Disease Index Score), and objective signs of DED as indicated by visual acuity (assessed by Schirmer's test, tear break-up time, lower and/or upper tear meniscus height measurement). Other secondary outcomes include patients' quality of life (assessed using the validated EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire), cost to the National Health Service (NHS) and patient (assessed via use of NHS services and privately purchased over-the-counter treatment related to DED) and safety measure of pressure within the eye (assessed by the Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Score).

Ethics and dissemination: This protocol and any subsequent amendments, along with any accompanying material provided to the participant in addition to any advertising material used in this trial have been approved by the East of England - Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 17/EE/0508). Written approval from the committee was obtained and subsequently submitted to the respective Trust's Research and Development (R&D) office with final NHS R&D approval obtained. Data obtained from this study will be published in a suitable peer-review journal and will also presented at international ophthalmic conferences including the American Academy of Ophthalmology, the Royal College of Ophthalmology Annual Congress, the Association for Research and Vision and Ophthalmology, and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. Information will be provided to patient groups and charities such as the Sjogren's Society and the Royal National Institute of Blind People. This will also be shared with the study participants as well as with relevant patient groups and charities.

Trial registration number: NCT03395431; Pre-results.

Keywords: clinical trials; ophthalmology; orbital and lacrimal disorders.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study scheme. FAB, fresh autologous blood.

References

    1. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1264–8. 10.1001/archopht.118.9.1264
    1. Hom MM, Nguyen AL, Bielory L. Allergic conjunctivitis and dry eye syndrome. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2012;108:163–6. 10.1016/j.anai.2012.01.006
    1. Schiffman RM, Walt JG, Jacobsen G, et al. . Utility assessment among patients with dry eye disease. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1412–9. 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00462-7
    1. National Eye Research Centre, 2016. Eye research overview.
    1. Kymionis GD, Bouzoukis DI, Diakonis VF, et al. . Treatment of chronic dry eye: focus on cyclosporine. Clin Ophthalmol 2008;2:829–36.
    1. Diebold Y, Herreras JM, Callejo S, et al. . Carbomer- versus cellulose-based artificial-tear formulations: morphologic and toxicologic effects on a corneal cell line. Cornea 1998;17:433.
    1. Yokoi N, Yamada H, Mizukusa Y, et al. . Rheology of tear film lipid layer spread in normal and aqueous tear-deficient dry eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:5319–24. 10.1167/iovs.07-1407
    1. Pfister R, Burstein N. The effects of opthalmic drugs, vehicles and preservatives on corneal epithelium: a scanning electron microscope study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1976;15:246–59.
    1. Fox RI, Chan R, Michelson JB, et al. . Beneficial effect of artificial tears made with autologous serum in patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:577–83.
    1. Poon AC, Geerling G, Dart JK, et al. . Autologous serum eyedrops for dry eyes and epithelial defects: clinical and in vitro toxicity studies. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:1188–97. 10.1136/bjo.85.10.1188
    1. Tsubota K, Goto E, Fujita H, et al. . Treatment of dry eye by autologous serum application in Sjögren’s syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:390–5. 10.1136/bjo.83.4.390
    1. Pan Q, Angelina A, Zambrano A, et al. . Autologous serum eye drops for dry eye. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;8.
    1. Biswas S, Zaheer I, Monsalve B, et al. . Compression sutures with autologous blood injection for leaking trabeculectomy blebs. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:549–50. 10.1136/bjo.2008.142497
    1. Burnstein A, WuDunn D, Ishii Y, et al. . Autologous blood injection for late-onset filtering bleb leak. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132:36–40. 10.1016/S0002-9394(01)00873-X
    1. Dinah C, Bhachech B, Ghosh G. Long-term success with autologous blood injection for leaking trabeculectomy blebs. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:392–3. 10.1136/bjo.2009.164160
    1. Haynes WL, Alward WL. Combination of autologous blood injection and bleb compression sutures to treat hypotony maculopathy. J Glaucoma 1999;8:384???387 10.1097/00061198-199912000-00008
    1. de Wit D, Athanasiadis I, Sharma A, et al. . Sutureless and glue-free conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery: a case series. Eye 2010;24:1474–7. 10.1038/eye.2010.75
    1. Chuang LH, Wang NK, Yeung L, et al. . Use of autologous whole blood during internal limiting membrane peeling and macular hole surgery is protective for indocyanine green toxicity. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2010;29:98–104. 10.3109/15569521003627867
    1. Lai CC, Hwang YS, Liu L, et al. . Blood-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole repair. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1525–30. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.02.025
    1. Lai CC, Wu WC, Chuang LH, et al. . Prevention of indocyanine green toxicity on retinal pigment epithelium with whole blood in stain-assisted macular hole surgery. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1409–14. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.02.025
    1. McCannel CA. Heparinized autologous blood for visualization of the internal limiting membrane during macular hole surgery. Retina 2008;28:356–7. 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31815feda6
    1. Than J, Balal S, Wawrzynski J, et al. . Fingerprick autologous blood: a novel treatment for dry eye syndrome. Eye 2017;31:1655–63. 10.1038/eye.2017.118
    1. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2004;10:307–12. 10.1111/j.2002.384.doc.x
    1. Sim J, Lewis M. The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:301–8. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.011
    1. Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat 2005;4:287–91. 10.1002/pst.185
    1. Ramsey SD, Willke RJ, Glick H, et al. . Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II-An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health 2015;18:161–72. 10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.001
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2013. NICE Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013
    1. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. . Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 2011;20:1727–36. 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x
    1. Fisher LD, Dixon DO, Herson J, et al. . Intention to treat in clinical trials Statistical issues in drug research and development. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1990:331–50.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332 10.1136/bmj.c332
    1. IBM. IBM SPSS Statistics for windows, version 22.0. Armounk, NY: IBM Corp, 2012.
    1. Cox D. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc 1972;34:187–220.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться