Cluster-randomized controlled trial of an HIV/sexually transmitted infection risk-reduction intervention for South African men

John B Jemmott 3rd, Loretta S Jemmott, Ann O'Leary, Zolani Ngwane, Larry D Icard, G Anita Heeren, Xoliswa Mtose, Craig Carty, John B Jemmott 3rd, Loretta S Jemmott, Ann O'Leary, Zolani Ngwane, Larry D Icard, G Anita Heeren, Xoliswa Mtose, Craig Carty

Abstract

Objectives: We tested the efficacy of a sexual risk-reduction intervention for men in South Africa, where heterosexual exposure is the main mode of HIV transmission.

Methods: Matched-pairs of neighborhoods in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa, were randomly selected and within pairs randomized to 1 of 2 interventions based on social cognitive theory and qualitative research: HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk-reduction, targeting condom use, or attention-matched control, targeting health issues unrelated to sexual risks. Sexually active men aged 18 to 45 years were eligible. The primary outcome was consistent condom use in the past 3 months.

Results: Of 1181 participants, 1106 (93.6%) completed the 12-month follow-up. HIV and STI risk-reduction participants had higher odds of reporting consistent condom use (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03, 1.71) and condom use at last vaginal intercourse (OR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.08, 1.82) than did attention-control participants, adjusting for baseline prevalence. No differences were observed on unprotected intercourse or multiple partnerships. Findings did not differ for sex with steady as opposed to casual partners.

Conclusions: Behavioral interventions specifically targeting men can contribute to efforts to reduce sexual risk behaviors in South Africa.

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Progress of participating neighborhoods and men through the trial: Eastern Cape Province, South Africa, 2007–2010. Note. STI = sexually transmitted infection. Eligible men not enrolled failed to return for intervention session 1 for unknown reasons. The enrollment rate did not differ between treatment (88.8%) and control (90.6%) arms (P = .264). Men who did not complete the 6-mo follow-up were deceased (n = 9) or in prison (n = 4), had permanently moved from the area (n = 17), or were absent from the scheduled follow-up sessions or make-up sessions for unknown reasons (n = 58). Men not followed up at 12 months were deceased (n = 14) or in prison (n = 2), had permanently moved from the area (n = 34), or were absent for unknown reasons (n = 25).

Source: PubMed

Подписаться