A single-blind, dose-escalation, phase I study of high-fluence light-emitting diode-red light on Caucasian non-Hispanic skin: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Erica B Wang, Ramanjot Kaur, Julie Nguyen, Derek Ho, Evan Austin, Emanual Maverakis, Chin-Shang Li, Samuel T Hwang, R Rivkah Isseroff, Jared Jagdeo, Erica B Wang, Ramanjot Kaur, Julie Nguyen, Derek Ho, Evan Austin, Emanual Maverakis, Chin-Shang Li, Samuel T Hwang, R Rivkah Isseroff, Jared Jagdeo

Abstract

Background: Visible light (400 to 700 nm) is common in our environment, comprising 44% of total solar radiation and a large component of environmental light exposure. The effects of visible light on skin remain undefined. The red light portion of the visible spectrum (600 to 700 nm) may be used to treat skin diseases as a monotherapeutic modality or in combination with other agents. Light-emitting diode-red light (LED-RL) phototherapy may represent an important advance in light-based treatment modalities because it is non-invasive, inexpensive, portable, and easily combinable with other therapies. We previously determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of high-fluence LED-RL (HF-LED-RL) in skin of color individuals to be 320 J/cm2. To the best of our knowledge, no clinical trials have been performed to determine the safety of higher doses of HF-LED-RL in Caucasian non-Hispanic individuals. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety of HF-LED-RL at doses of 480 and 640 J/cm2 in healthy Caucasian non-Hispanic individuals.

Methods: This is a single-blind, dose-escalation, randomized, controlled, phase I trial titled Safety Trial Assessing Red-light on Skin (STARS) 2. Healthy subjects will be randomly assigned to groups of five (three subjects randomly assigned to HF-LED-RL phototherapy and two subjects randomly assigned to mock therapy). Subjects in group 1 will receive HF-LED-RL or mock irradiation at the starting dose of 480 J/cm2, and the dose will be escalated in the subsequent group (group 2) to 640 J/cm2. The MTD is defined as the dose level below the dose at which two or more subjects (>20% of the cohort) experience a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After either the MTD is established or the study endpoint of 640 J/cm2 is achieved, additional HF-LED-RL phototherapy subjects and mock therapy subjects will be enrolled at that fluence (group 3) for a total number of up to 60 subjects. Each subject will receive a total of nine irradiation sessions, three times per week for three consecutive weeks.

Discussion: This follow-up study aims to provide important knowledge about safety and cutaneous effects of HF-LED-RL phototherapy of 480 and 640 J/cm2 in Caucasian non-Hispanic subjects. The importance of this clinical trial is that it may establish new treatment paradigms and a safety profile for LED-RL based on race and ethnicity.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03433222 . Registered on February 1, 2018 - Retrospectively registered. Protocol date and version: January 12, 2018; version 1.

Keywords: Dose escalation; High fluence; Light-emitting diode-red light; Phase I; Phototherapy; Randomized controlled trial; Safety; Study protocol; Visible red light.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Study approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Studies Subcommittee at the Sacramento VA Medical Center (reference [18]–01-00804) on January 26, 2018. Any protocol amendments will require IRB approval. Routine auditing of this study will be performed in accordance with VA guidelines. The protocol identification number on ClinicalTrials.gov is NCT03433222. This study will be conducted in accordance with medical professional codex and the Helsinki Declaration as of 1996 as well as Data Security Laws and Good Clinical Practice criteria. Written IRB-approved informed consent will be obtained from all subjects prior to enrollment, and subjects will be given adequate time to declare whether they wish to participate in this study before signing the consent form. Study participation is voluntary and can be withdrawn at any time without provision of reason and without negative consequences for future medical care.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study dose-escalation flow diagram. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the dose level below the dose producing a dose-limiting toxicity in two or more subjects. Abbreviations: AE adverse event, HF-LED-RL High-fluence light-emitting diode-red light, VA Veterans Affairs.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Subject diary template to capture patient-reported outcome
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) Figure. Time schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments

References

    1. Pidwirny M. In: Solar Radiation and Earth, in Understanding Physical Geography. Pidwirny M, editor. British Columbia: Our Planet Earth Publishing; 2017.
    1. Austin E, Huang A, Adar T, Wang E, Jagdeo J. Electronic device generated light increases reactive oxygen species in human fibroblasts. Lasers Surg Med. 2018. 10.1002/lsm.22794 [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Porges SB, Kaidbey KH, Grove GL. Quantification of visible light-induced melanogenesis in human skin. Photodermatol. 1988;5:197–200.
    1. Soleymani T, Cohen DE, Folan LM, Okereke UR, Elbuluk N, Soter NA. Disparity in Cutaneous Pigmentary Response to LED vs Halogen Incandescent Visible Light: Results from a Single Center, Investigational Clinical Trial Determining a Minimal Pigmentary Visible Light Dose. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16:1105–1110.
    1. Sklar LR, Almutawa F, Lim HW, Hamzavi I. Effects of ultraviolet radiation, visible light, and infrared radiation on erythema and pigmentation: a review. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2013;12:54–64. doi: 10.1039/C2PP25152C.
    1. Mahmoud BH, Ruvolo E, Hexsel CL, Liu Y, Owen MR, Kollias N, et al. Impact of long-wavelength UVA and visible light on melanocompetent skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:2092–2097. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.95.
    1. Campbell SM, Tyrrell J, Marshall R, Curnow A. Effect of MAL-photodynamic therapy on hypertrophic scarring. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. 2010;7:183–188. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2010.07.003.
    1. Nie Z, Bayat A, Behzad F, Rhodes LE. Positive response of a recurrent keloid scar to topical methyl aminolevulinate-photodynamic therapy. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2010;26:330–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2010.00539.x.
    1. Sakamoto FH, Izikson L, Tannous Z, Zurakowski D, Anderson RR. Surgical scar remodelling after photodynamic therapy using aminolaevulinic acid or its methylester: a retrospective, blinded study of patients with field cancerization. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166:413–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10576.x.
    1. Li Y, Zhang J, Xu Y, Han Y, Jiang B, Huang L, et al. The Histopathological Investigation of Red and Blue Light Emitting Diode on Treating Skin Wounds in Japanese Big-Ear White Rabbit. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157898.
    1. Mamalis A, Jagdeo J. Light-emitting diode-generated red light inhibits keloid fibroblast proliferation. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41:35–39. doi: 10.1097/01.DSS.0000452650.06765.51.
    1. Mamalis A, Koo E, Garcha M, Murphy WJ, Isseroff RR, Jagdeo J. High fluence light emitting diode-generated red light modulates characteristics associated with skin fibrosis. J Biophotonics. 2016;9:1167–1179. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201600059.
    1. Jagdeo J, Austin E, Mamalis A, Wong C, Ho D, Siegel DM. Light-emitting diodes in dermatology: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Surg Med. 2018. 10.1002/lsm.22791 [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Wunsch A, Matuschka K. A controlled trial to determine the efficacy of red and near-infrared light treatment in patient satisfaction, reduction of fine lines, wrinkles, skin roughness, and intradermal collagen density increase. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32:93–100. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.3616.
    1. Archier E, Devaux S, Castela E, Gallini A, Aubin F, Le Maître M, et al. Carcinogenic risks of psoralen UV-A therapy and narrowband UV-B therapy in chronic plaque psoriasis: a systematic literature review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(Suppl 3):22–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04520.x.
    1. Bolognia J, Schaffer J. Irradiation of skin with visible light induces reactive oxygen species and matrix-degrading enzymes. In: Bolognia J, Jorizzo J, Schaffer J, editors. Dermatology. 3 2012.
    1. Jagdeo JR, Adams LE, Brody NI, Siegel DM. Transcranial red and near infrared light transmission in a cadaveric model. PLoS One. 2012;7:e47460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047460.
    1. Posadzki P, Car J. Light therapies for acne. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154:597–598. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.0110.
    1. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:869–871. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008.
    1. Eilers S, Bach DQ, Gaber R, Blatt H, Guevara Y, Nitsche K, et al. Accuracy of self-report in assessing Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I through VI. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:1289–1294. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6101.
    1. Jackson BA. Lasers in ethnic skin: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(6 Suppl):S134–S138. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2003.275.
    1. Ho D, Kraeva E, Wun T, Isseroff RR, Jagdeo J. A single-blind, dose escalation, phase I study of high-fluence light-emitting diode-red light (LED-RL) on human skin: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:385. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1518-7.
    1. Sadick NS. A study to determine the efficacy of a novel handheld light-emitting diode device in the treatment of photoaged skin. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2008;7:263–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2008.00404.x.
    1. Sadick NS. Handheld LED array device in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008;7:347–350.
    1. Spilker B. Guide to Clinical Trials. New York: Raven Press; 1991.
    1. Lev-Tov H, Mamalis A, Brody N, Siegel D, Jagdeo J. Inhibition of fibroblast proliferation in vitro using red light-emitting diodes. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39:1167–1170. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12212.
    1. Le Tourneau C, Lee JJ, Siu LL. Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:708–720. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp079.
    1. Hanley JA, Lippman-Hand A. If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators. JAMA. 1983;249:1743–1745. doi: 10.1001/jama.1983.03330370053031.
    1. Anderson KL, Feldman SR. A guide to prescribing home phototherapy for patients with psoriasis: the appropriate patient, the type of unit, the treatment regimen, and the potential obstacles. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:868–878. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.003.
    1. Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA, Feldman SR, Gelfand JM, Gordon KB, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 5. Guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with phototherapy and photochemotherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62:114–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.08.026.
    1. Racial and Ethnic Categories and Definitions for NIH Diversity Programs and for Other Reporting Purposes. Natl Inst Health. 2015. Available from: . Accessed 21 Feb 2019.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for the Photo Therapeutoics Limited Omnilux New-U. 2007; Available from: . [cited 2016 January 12].
    1. Travers JB, Spandau DF, Lewis DA, Machado C, Kingsley M, Mousdicas N, et al. Fibroblast senescence and squamous cell carcinoma: how wounding therapies could be protective. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39:967–973. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12138.
    1. Chaowattanapanit S, Silpa-Archa N, Kohli I, Lim HW, Hamzavi I. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation: A comprehensive overview: Treatment options and prevention. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77:607–621. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.01.036.
    1. Gloster HM, Jr, Neal K Skin cancer in skin of color. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:741–760. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.08.063.
    1. Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983;220:524–527. doi: 10.1126/science.6836297.
    1. National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics. Projected Veteran Population 2013 to 2043. 2014; Available from: . [cited 2015 September 14].
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:79.
    1. Baran R, Maibach HI, editors. Textbook of Cosmetic Dermatology. 5th ed. London: CRC Press; 2017.
    1. Koehler MJ, König K, Elsner P, Bückle R, Kaatz M. In vivo assessment of human skin aging by multiphoton laser scanning tomography. Opt Lett. 2006;31:2879–2881. doi: 10.1364/OL.31.002879.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться