Pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir and rifabutin coadministered in HIV-negative healthy volunteers

Vanitha Sekar, Ludo Lavreys, Tom Van de Casteele, Cindy Berckmans, Sabrina Spinosa-Guzman, Tony Vangeneugden, Martine De Pauw, Richard Hoetelmans, Vanitha Sekar, Ludo Lavreys, Tom Van de Casteele, Cindy Berckmans, Sabrina Spinosa-Guzman, Tony Vangeneugden, Martine De Pauw, Richard Hoetelmans

Abstract

The drug-drug interaction between rifabutin (RFB) and darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) was examined in a randomized, three-way crossover study of HIV-negative healthy volunteers who received DRV/r 600/100 mg twice a day (BID) (treatment A), RFB 300 mg once a day (QD) (treatment B), and DRV/r 600/100 mg BID plus RFB 150 mg every other day (QOD) (treatment C). The sequence of treatments was randomized, and each treatment period lasted 12 days. Full pharmacokinetic profiles were determined for DRV, ritonavir, and RFB and its active metabolite, 25-O-desacetylrifabutin (desRFB), on day 13. The DRV and ritonavir areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to 12 h (AUC(12h)) increased by 57% and 66%, respectively, in the presence of RFB. The RFB exposure was comparable between treatment with RFB QD alone (treatment B) and treatment with DRV/r plus RFB QOD (treatment C); however, based on least-square means ratios, the minimum plasma concentration (C(min)) increased by 64% and the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) decreased by 28%, respectively. The exposure (AUC within the dosage interval and at steady state [AUC(τ)]) to desRFB was considerably increased (by 881%) following treatment with DRV/r/RFB. The exposure to the parent drug plus the metabolite increased 1.6-fold in the presence of DRV/r. Adverse events (AEs) were more commonly reported during combined treatment (83% versus 44% for RFB and 28% for DRV/r); similarly, grade 3-4 AEs occurred in 17% versus 11% and 0%, respectively, of volunteers. Eighteen of 27 volunteers (66.7%) prematurely discontinued the trial; all volunteers discontinuing for safety reasons (n = 9) did so during RFB treatment phases. These results suggest that DRV/r may be coadministered with RFB with a dose adjustment of RFB to 150 mg QOD and increased monitoring for RFB-related AEs. Based on the overall safety profile of DRV/r, no dose adjustment of DRV/r is considered to be warranted. Given the safety profile seen with the combination of RFB with a boosted protease inhibitor in this and other studies, it is not recommended to conduct further studies with this combination in healthy volunteers.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Overview of trial design. Volunteers received three treatments in a sequence allocated randomly. Treatments: A, DRV/r 600/100 mg BID on days 1 to 12, with an additional morning dose on day 13; B, RFB 300 mg QD on days 1 to 13; C, DRV/r 600/100 mg BID on days 1 to 13 plus RFB 150 mg QOD from day 1 to 13.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Mean plasma concentration-time curves (including standard deviations [SD]) of DRV after administration of DRV/r alone (treatment A; day 13) and in combination with RFB 150 mg QOD (treatment C; day 13).
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
(A) Mean plasma concentration-time curves (including SDs) of RFB (i) and desRFB (ii) after administration of RFB alone (treatment B, day 13) and in combination with DRV/r (treatment C; day 13). (B) Individual plasma concentration-time curves of RFB for each volunteer after administration of RFB alone (treatment B; day 13) and in combination with DRV/r (treatment C; day 13).

Source: PubMed

Подписаться