Vitamin C supplementation in very preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial

B A Darlow, H Buss, F McGill, L Fletcher, P Graham, C C Winterbourn, B A Darlow, H Buss, F McGill, L Fletcher, P Graham, C C Winterbourn

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether regulating vitamin C (ascorbic acid: AA) intake to achieve higher or lower plasma concentrations was associated with improved clinical outcome.

Design: A double blind, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Neonatal intensive care unit at Christchurch Women's Hospital.

Patients: Infants with birth weight <1500 g or gestation <32 weeks, admitted to the unit within 48 hours of birth.

Intervention: Infants were randomised to one of three protocols with regard to AA supplementation for the first 28 days of life: group LL received low supplementation throughout; group LH received low until day 10 and then high: group HH received high throughout.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measures were oxygen requirement at 28 days and 36 weeks postmenstrual age, total days supplemental oxygen, and retinopathy of prematurity. AA concentrations were measured at study entry (day 2), and days 10, 21, and 28.

Results: A total of 119 infants were enrolled over 24 months (mean gestation 28.4 weeks; birth weight 1161 g). Six infants died, and these had significantly higher AA concentrations before randomisation than surviving infants (116 micromol/l (95% confidence interval 90 to 142) v 51 micromol/l (45 to 58), p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in primary outcomes between the groups. However, the proportion of surviving infants with an oxygen requirement at 36 weeks postmenstrual age in group HH (19%) was half that in group LL (41%) (p=0.06).

Conclusions: In a randomised controlled trial, no significant benefits or harmful effects were associated with treatment allocation to higher or lower AA supplementation throughout the first 28 days of life.

References

    1. J Biol Chem. 1997 Jun 20;272(25):15656-60
    1. Clin Sci (Lond). 1996 Nov;91(5):633-8
    1. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 1997;67(5):321-8
    1. Am J Perinatol. 1998 Feb;15(2):133-40
    1. Nature. 1998 Apr 9;392(6676):559
    1. Pediatr Res. 1998 Jun;43(6):719-26
    1. FASEB J. 1999 Jun;13(9):1007-24
    1. FEBS Lett. 1992 Jun 1;303(2-3):210-2
    1. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1992 May-Jun;16(3):241-7
    1. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 1992 Oct;38(5):511-5
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994 Jul;71(1):F40-4
    1. J Pediatr. 1995 Jan;126(1):128-31
    1. Free Radic Res. 1995 Jan;22(1):57-65
    1. Pediatr Res. 1995 Mar;37(3):343-53
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 May;72(3):F211-2
    1. Free Radic Res. 1996 Nov;25(5):439-54
    1. Acta Paediatr. 2001 Jul;90(7):813-5
    1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001 Oct 19;288(1):245-51
    1. Free Radic Res. 2003 Jan;37(1):51-8
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981 Sep;34(9):1706-11
    1. Am J Dis Child. 1983 Oct;137(10):949-51
    1. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1983 Nov;2(4):629-34
    1. Pediatrics. 1986 Apr;77(4):530-8
    1. Anal Biochem. 1987 Aug 15;165(1):102-7
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Nov;48(5):1324-42
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(16):6377-81
    1. Pediatr Res. 1989 Jul;26(1):20-4
    1. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1990 Feb;18(1):41-6
    1. Free Radic Biol Med. 1997;23(3):361-6

Source: PubMed

Подписаться