Pediatric Weight Management Through mHealth Compared to Face-to-Face Care: Cost Analysis of a Randomized Control Trial

Louise Tully, Jan Sorensen, Grace O'Malley, Louise Tully, Jan Sorensen, Grace O'Malley

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) may improve pediatric weight management capacity and the geographical reach of services, and overcome barriers to attending physical appointments using ubiquitous devices such as smartphones and tablets. This field remains an emerging research area with some evidence of its effectiveness; however, there is a scarcity of literature describing economic evaluations of mHealth interventions.

Objective: We aimed to assess the economic viability of using an mHealth approach as an alternative to standard multidisciplinary care by evaluating the direct costs incurred within treatment arms during a noninferiority randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Methods: A digitally delivered (via a smartphone app) maintenance phase of a pediatric weight management program was developed iteratively with patients and families using evidence-based approaches. We undertook a microcosting exercise and budget impact analysis to assess the costs of delivery from the perspective of the publicly funded health care system. Resource use was analyzed alongside the RCT, and we estimated the costs associated with the staff time and resources for service delivery per participant.

Results: In total, 109 adolescents participated in the trial, and 84 participants completed the trial (25 withdrew from the trial). We estimated the mean direct cost per adolescent attending usual care at €142 (SD 23.7), whereas the cost per adolescent in the mHealth group was €722 (SD 221.1), with variations depending on the number of weeks of treatment completion. The conversion rate for the reference year 2013 was $1=€0.7525. The costs incurred for those who withdrew from the study ranged from €35 to €681, depending on the point of dropout and study arm. The main driver of the costs in the mHealth arm was the need for health professional monitoring and support for patients on a weekly basis. The budget impact for offering the mHealth intervention to all newly referred patients in a 1-year period was estimated at €59,046 using the assessed approach.

Conclusions: This mHealth approach was substantially more expensive than usual care, although modifications to the intervention may offer opportunities to reduce the mHealth costs. The need for monitoring and support from health care professionals (HCPs) was not eliminated using this delivery model. Further research is needed to explore the cost-effectiveness and economic impact on families and from a wider societal perspective.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01804855; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01804855.

Keywords: childhood obesity; digital health; economic evaluation; mHealth; pediatric weight management; telemedicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The senior author (GO’M) led the design and ongoing development of the Reactivate system.

©Louise Tully, Jan Sorensen, Grace O'Malley. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 14.09.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial allocation and completion among participants with base case cost estimates. mHealth: mobile health.

References

    1. Tully L, Burls A, Sorensen J, El-Moslemany R, O'Malley G. Mobile health for pediatric weight management: systematic scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun;8(6):e16214. doi: 10.2196/16214. v8i6e16214
    1. Ells L, Mead E, Atkinson G, Corpeleijn E, Roberts K, Viner R, Baur L, Metzendorf MI, Richter B. Surgery for the treatment of obesity in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun;(6):CD011740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011740.
    1. Mead E, Atkinson G, Richter B, Metzendorf MI, Baur L, Finer N, Corpeleijn E, O'Malley C, Ells LJ. Drug interventions for the treatment of obesity in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov;11(11):CD012436. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012436.
    1. Mead E, Brown T, Rees K, Azevedo LB, Whittaker V, Jones D, Olajide J, Mainardi GM, Corpeleijn E, O'Malley C, Beardsmore E, Al-Khudairy L, Baur L, Metzendorf M, Demaio A, Ells LJ. Diet, physical activity and behavioural interventions for the treatment of overweight or obese children from the age of 6 to 11 years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec;6(6):CD012651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012651.
    1. Rose T, Barker M, Maria JC, Morrison L, Lawrence W, Strömmer S, Vogel C, Woods-Townsend K, Farrell D, Inskip H, Baird J. A systematic review of digital interventions for improving the diet and physical activity behaviors of adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2017 Dec;61(6):669–677. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.05.024. S1054-139X(17)30253-7
    1. Brown V, Tran H, Downing KL, Hesketh KD, Moodie M. A systematic review of economic evaluations of web-based or telephone-delivered interventions for preventing overweight and obesity and/or improving obesity-related behaviors. Obes Rev. 2021 Jul;22(7):e13227. doi: 10.1111/obr.13227.
    1. Woo Baidal JA, Chang J, Hulse E, Turetsky R, Parkinson K, Rausch JC. Zooming towards a telehealth solution for vulnerable children with obesity during COVID-19. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2020 Apr;28(7):1184–1186. doi: 10.1002/oby.22860.
    1. Drummond M, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Stoddart G, Torrance G. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Fourth edition. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 2.
    1. Luxton DD, Hansen RN, Stanfill K. Mobile app self-care versus in-office care for stress reduction: a cost minimization analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Dec;20(8):431–435. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14555616.1357633X14555616
    1. Armstrong KA, Semple JL, Coyte PC. Replacing ambulatory surgical follow-up visits with mobile app home monitoring: modeling cost-effective scenarios. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Sep;16(9):e213. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3528. v16i9e213
    1. McNamee P, Murray E, Kelly MP, Bojke L, Chilcott J, Fischer A, West R, Yardley L. Designing and undertaking a health economics study of digital health interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):852–860. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.007.S0749-3797(16)30177-5
    1. EASO COM applications Teddington, EASO Secretariat; 2021 online. European Association for the Study of Obesity. [2021-07-26].
    1. O'Malley G, Clarke M, Burls A, Murphy S, Murphy N, Perry IJ. A smartphone intervention for adolescent obesity: study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2014 Jan;15:43. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-43. 1745-6215-15-43
    1. O'Malley G, Dowdall G, Burls A, Perry IJ, Curran N. Exploring the usability of a mobile app for adolescent obesity management. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Jun;2(2):e29. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3262. v2i2e29
    1. O'Malley GC. Cork Open Research Archive. Cork: University College Cork; 2015. [2021-07-26]. Childhood obesity treatment: integrating mobile health technology into a paediatric obesity service. .
    1. Warschburger P, Kröller K. Loss to follow-up in a randomized controlled trial study for pediatric weight management (EPOC) BMC Pediatr. 2016 Nov;16(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0727-2. 10.1186/s12887-016-0727-2
    1. O'Malley G, Perry IJ, Brinkley A, Sheridan N, Dowdall G, Murphy S, Clarke M, Burls AJ. Exploring the clinical effectiveness of a mobile health intervention for adolescent weight management. Obesity Reviews; Joint European and International Congress on Obesity (ECO-ICO) 2020; September 2020; Online. 2020.
    1. Quigley E, O'Donnell S, Doyle G. Research Methods Cases: Medicine and Health. London: SAGE; 2020. Time-driven activity-based costing: a step-by-step guide to collecting patient-level health care costs.
    1. Public Health England. London: [2021-07-26]. How to use a cost effectiveness analysis to evaluate your digital health product. .
    1. Health Information and Quality Authority. Dublin: Health Information and Quality Authority; 2020. [2021-08-30]. Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Ireland. .
    1. Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection. Dublin: Government of Ireland; [2021-07-26]. PRSI Class A rates.
    1. HR Circular 034/2019: standardisation of annual leave health and social care professionals Dublin. Health Service Executive; 2019. [2021-07-26]. .
    1. Payscales for HSE staff. Health Service Executive. 2013. [2021-07-26]. .
    1. Bösch PM, Becker F, Becker H, Axhausen KW. Cost-based analysis of autonomous mobility services. Transport Policy. 2018 May;64:76–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.09.005.
    1. Karlson CW, Rapoff MA. Attrition in randomized controlled trials for pediatric chronic conditions. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Aug;34(7):782–793. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn122.
    1. Hill J, McGinn J, Cairns J, Free C, Smith C. A mobile phone-based support intervention to increase use of postabortion family planning in Cambodia: cost-effectiveness evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb;8(2):e16276. doi: 10.2196/16276. v8i2e16276
    1. Tully L, Case L, Arthurs N, Sorensen J, Marcin JP, O'Malley G. Barriers and facilitators for implementing paediatric telemedicine: rapid review of user perspectives. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:630365. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.630365. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.630365.
    1. Farabi H, Rezapour A, Jahangiri R, Jafari A, Rashki Kemmak A, Nikjoo S. Economic evaluation of the utilization of telemedicine for patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Heart Fail Rev. 2020 Nov;25(6):1063–1075. doi: 10.1007/s10741-019-09864-4.10.1007/s10741-019-09864-4
    1. Sanyal C, Stolee P, Juzwishin D, Husereau D. Economic evaluations of eHealth technologies: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198112. PONE-D-17-32371
    1. Moorman EL, Koskela-Staples NC, Mathai BB, Fedele DA, Janicke DM. Pediatric obesity treatment via telehealth: current evidence and future directions. Curr Obes Rep. 2021 Jul;10(3):1–14. doi: 10.1007/s13679-021-00446-w.10.1007/s13679-021-00446-w
    1. Jiang X, Yao J, You JH. Telemonitoring versus usual care for elderly patients with heart failure discharged from the hospital in the United States: cost-effectiveness analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul;8(7):e17846. doi: 10.2196/17846. v8i7e17846
    1. Javalkar K, Rak E, Phillips A, Haberman C, Ferris M, Van Tilburg M. Predictors of caregiver burden among mothers of children with chronic conditions. Children (Basel) 2017 May;4(5):39. doi: 10.3390/children4050039. children4050039
    1. Kulik NL, Thomas EM, Iovan S, McKeough M, Kendzierski S, Leatherwood S. Access to primary care child weight management programs: urban parent barriers and facilitators to participation. J Child Health Care. 2017 Dec;21(4):509–521. doi: 10.1177/1367493517728401.
    1. Lim CS, Janicke DM. Barriers related to delivering pediatric weight management interventions to children and families from rural communities. Children's Health Care. 2013 Jul;42(3):214–230. doi: 10.1080/02739615.2013.816596.
    1. Nelson M, Russell T, Crossley K, Bourke M, McPhail S. Cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation versus traditional care after total hip replacement: a trial-based economic evaluation. J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Jul;27(6):359–366. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19869796.
    1. Iribarren SJ, Cato K, Falzon L, Stone PW. What is the economic evidence for mHealth? a systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLoS One. 2017 Feb;12(2):e0170581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170581. PONE-D-16-26479
    1. Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Huebschmann A. A scoping review and general user's guide for facilitating the successful use of eHealth programs for diabetes in clinical care. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Feb;23(2):133–145. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0383.
    1. Sadeghian R, Gooch R, Phelps L, Preud'homme D. The feasibility and satisfaction of using telemedicine to provide tertiary paediatric obesity care. J Int Soc Telemed eHealth. 2018 Sep;6(1):1–9.
    1. A Europe fit for the digital age. European Commission Directorate-General for Communication. 2020. [2021-07-26]. .
    1. Kuhle S, Doucette R, Piccinini-Vallis H, Kirk SFL. Successful childhood obesity management in primary care in Canada: what are the odds? PeerJ. 2015;3:e1327. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1327. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1327.1327
    1. Safefood. Cork: 2017. [2021-07-26]. What are the estimated costs of childhood overweight and obesity on the island of Ireland? .

Source: PubMed

Подписаться