Early Adopters of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Preexposure Prophylaxis in a Population-based Combination Prevention Study in Rural Kenya and Uganda

Catherine A Koss, James Ayieko, Florence Mwangwa, Asiphas Owaraganise, Dalsone Kwarisiima, Laura B Balzer, Albert Plenty, Norton Sang, Jane Kabami, Theodore D Ruel, Douglas Black, Carol S Camlin, Craig R Cohen, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Tamara D Clark, Edwin D Charlebois, Maya L Petersen, Moses R Kamya, Diane V Havlir, SEARCH Collaboration, Catherine A Koss, James Ayieko, Florence Mwangwa, Asiphas Owaraganise, Dalsone Kwarisiima, Laura B Balzer, Albert Plenty, Norton Sang, Jane Kabami, Theodore D Ruel, Douglas Black, Carol S Camlin, Craig R Cohen, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Tamara D Clark, Edwin D Charlebois, Maya L Petersen, Moses R Kamya, Diane V Havlir, SEARCH Collaboration

Abstract

Background: Global guidelines recommend preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for individuals with substantial human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk. Data on PrEP uptake in sub-Saharan Africa outside of clinical trials are limited. We report on "early adopters" of PrEP in the Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health (SEARCH) study in rural Uganda and Kenya.

Methods: After community mobilization and PrEP education, population-based HIV testing was conducted. HIV-uninfected adults were offered PrEP based on an empirically derived HIV risk score or self-identified HIV risk (if not identified by score). Using logistic regression, we analyzed predictors of early PrEP adoption (starting PrEP within 30 days vs delayed/no start) among adults identified for PrEP.

Results: Of 21212 HIV-uninfected adults in 5 communities, 4064 were identified for PrEP (2991 by empiric risk score, 1073 by self-identified risk). Seven hundred and thirty nine individuals started PrEP within 30 days (11% of those identified by risk score; 39% of self-identified); 77% on the same day. Among adults identified by risk score, predictors of early adoption included male sex (adjusted odds ratio 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.15), polygamy (1.92; 1.27-2.90), serodiscordant spouse (3.89; 1.18-12.76), self-perceived HIV risk (1.66; 1.28-2.14), and testing at health campaign versus home (5.24; 3.33-8.26). Among individuals who self-identified for PrEP, predictors of early adoption included older age (2.30; 1.29-4.08) and serodiscordance (2.61; 1.01-6.76).

Conclusions: Implementation of PrEP incorporating a population-based empiric risk score, self-identified risk, and rapid initiation, is feasible in rural East Africa. Strategies are needed to overcome barriers to PrEP uptake, particularly among women and youth.

Clinical trials registration: NCT01864603.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preexposure prophylaxis uptake among human immunodeficiency virus–uninfected adults in 5 Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health communities in rural Kenya and Uganda from June to October 2016. Abbreviations: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; PrEP, preexposure prophylaxis.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cumulative number of participants initiating preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by days since offer of PrEP during community-wide human immunodeficiency virus testing from June to October 2016 in 5 Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health communities in rural Kenya and Uganda.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться