Optimizing an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Microintervention Via a Mobile App With Two Cohorts: Protocol for Micro-Randomized Trials

Emily B Kroska, Sydney Hoel, Amanda Victory, Susan A Murphy, Melvin G McInnis, Zachary N Stowe, Amy Cochran, Emily B Kroska, Sydney Hoel, Amanda Victory, Susan A Murphy, Melvin G McInnis, Zachary N Stowe, Amy Cochran

Abstract

Background: Given gaps in the treatment of mental health, brief adaptive interventions have become a public health imperative. Transdiagnostic interventions may be particularly appropriate given high rates of medical comorbidity and the broader reach of transdiagnostic therapies. One such approach utilized herein is acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), which is focused on increasing engagement with values, awareness, and openness to internal experiences. ACT theory posits that experiential avoidance is at the center of human suffering, regardless of diagnosis, and, as such, seeks to reduce unworkable experiential avoidance.

Objective: Our objective is to provide the rationale and protocol for examining the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of optimizing an ACT-based intervention via a mobile app among two disparate samples, which differ in sociodemographic characteristics and symptom profiles.

Methods: Twice each day, participants are prompted via a mobile app to complete assessments of mood and activity and are then randomly assigned to an ACT-based intervention or not. These interventions are questions regarding engagement with values, awareness, and openness to internal experiences. Participant responses are recorded. Analyses will examine completion of assessments, change in symptoms from baseline assessment, and proximal change in mood and activity. A primary outcome of interest is proximal change in activity (eg, form and function of behavior and energy consumed by avoidance and values-based behavior) following interventions as a function of time, symptoms, and behavior, where we hypothesize that participants will focus more energy on values-based behaviors. Analyses will be conducted using a weighted and centered least squares approach. Two samples will run concurrently to assess the capacity of optimizing mobile ACT in populations that differ widely in their clinical presentation and sociodemographic characteristics: individuals with bipolar disorder (n=30) and distressed first-generation college students (n=50).

Results: Recruitment began on September 10, 2019, for the bipolar sample and on October 5, 2019, for the college sample. Participation in the study began on October 18, 2019.

Conclusions: This study examines an ACT-based intervention among two disparate samples. Should ACT demonstrate feasibility and preliminary effectiveness in each sample, a large randomized controlled trial applying ACT across diagnoses and demographics would be indicated. The public health implications of such an approach may be far-reaching.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04098497; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04098497; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04081662; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04081662.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/17086.

Keywords: acceptance and commitment therapy; bipolar disorder; clinical trial; mobile apps; mobile phone; students.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: ZS has received research support from the NIH, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Pfizer, Wyeth, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Sage Therapeutics; has served on speaker or advisory boards for Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Wyeth, Sage Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and GSK; and has received honoraria from Eli Lilly, GSK, Pfizer, and Wyeth. MM has consulted with and/or received grant funding from Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; he is a co-owner in Priori-AI, LLC.

©Emily B Kroska, Sydney Hoel, Amanda Victory, Susan A Murphy, Melvin G McInnis, Zachary N Stowe, Amy Cochran. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 23.09.2020.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) matrix. The ACT matrix encourages awareness of one’s values, internal experiences, and the function of one’s behaviors. The top two quadrants are observable behaviors, while the bottom two quadrants are internal experiences and not observable to others. The middle circle signifies the ability to notice each of these domains, categorizing all quadrants as part of a person’s experience.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Log functions of the Lorevimo app. The first screen (left) is where participants can set regular weekday and weekend wake times and bedtimes, which determines when they are prompted to log symptoms and activities. The second screen (center) is the mood symptoms log, including depression symptoms and perceived stress. The third screen (right) is the activity questionnaire.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Review function of the Lorevimo app. The first image (left) represents the top half of the acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) matrix, which sorts the function of behaviors. The second image (right) represents the bottom half of the ACT matrix, which sorts internal experiences and values (ie, who or what matters).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Visualize function of the Lorevimo app. The images represent screenshots of the Lorevimo app’s Visualize function. The first image (left) is a representation of the depressive symptoms in a 3-day (twice daily) interval. The second image (center) conveys the perceived stress symptoms (also a 3-day interval). The final image (right) reflects the responses to the question about energy consumed by avoidance behaviors (ie, away from internal experiences) or values-based behaviors (ie, toward who or what matters).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Microintervention examples from the Lorevimo app. These images reflect three of the 84 acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)-based intervention questions, also allowing space for participants to enter a response. The first (left) is an openness question, the second (center) an awareness question, and the third (right) an engagement question. CompACT: Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes.

References

    1. Howard KI, Kopta SM, Krause MS, Orlinsky DE. The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. Am Psychologist. 1986;41(2):159–164. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.41.2.159.
    1. Nieuwsma JA, Trivedi RB, McDuffie J, Kronish I, Benjamin D, Williams JW. Brief psychotherapy for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2012 Jun 15;43(2):129–151. doi: 10.2190/pm.43.2.c.
    1. Hansen N, Lambert M, Forman E. The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2006;9(3):329–343. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.9.3.329.
    1. Baldwin SA, Berkeljon A, Atkins DC, Olsen JA, Nielsen SL. Rates of change in naturalistic psychotherapy: Contrasting dose-effect and good-enough level models of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Apr;77(2):203–211. doi: 10.1037/a0015235.
    1. Martínez-Pérez B, de la Torre-Díez I, López-Coronado M. Mobile health applications for the most prevalent conditions by the World Health Organization: Review and analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jun 14;15(6):e120. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2600.
    1. Rajagopalan A, Shah P, Zhang M, Ho R. Digital platforms in the assessment and monitoring of patients with bipolar disorder. Brain Sci. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):150. doi: 10.3390/brainsci7110150.
    1. Rizvi S, Hughes C, Thomas M. The DBT Coach mobile application as an adjunct to treatment for suicidal and self-injuring individuals with borderline personality disorder: A preliminary evaluation and challenges to client utilization. Psychol Serv. 2016 Nov;13(4):380–388. doi: 10.1037/ser0000100.
    1. Wright JH, Mishkind M. Computer-assisted CBT and mobile apps for depression: Assessment and integration into clinical care. Focus. 2020 Apr;18(2):162–168. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190044.
    1. Sucala M, Cuijpers P, Muench F, Cardoș R, Soflau R, Dobrean A, Achimas-Cadariu P, David D. Anxiety: There is an app for that. A systematic review of anxiety apps. Depress Anxiety. 2017 Jun;34(6):518–525. doi: 10.1002/da.22654.
    1. Miner A, Kuhn E, Hoffman J, Owen J, Ruzek J, Taylor C. Feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of the PTSD Coach app: A pilot randomized controlled trial with community trauma survivors. Psychol Trauma. 2016 May;8(3):384–392. doi: 10.1037/tra0000092.
    1. Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I, Saraceno B. The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Nov;82(11):858–866.
    1. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The Process and Practice of Mindful Change. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2012.
    1. Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jan;44(1):1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006.
    1. Dindo L. One-day acceptance and commitment training workshops in medical populations. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015 Apr 01;2:38–42. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.018.
    1. Lillis J, Hayes SC, Bunting K, Masuda A. Teaching acceptance and mindfulness to improve the lives of the obese: A preliminary test of a theoretical model. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Feb;37(1):58–69. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9083-x.
    1. Bach P, Hayes SC. The use of acceptance and commitment therapy to prevent the rehospitalization of psychotic patients: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70(5):1129–1139. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.5.1129.
    1. Räsänen P, Lappalainen P, Muotka J, Tolvanen A, Lappalainen R. An online guided ACT intervention for enhancing the psychological wellbeing of university students: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Behav Res Ther. 2016 Mar;78:30–42. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.01.001.
    1. Mattila E, Lappalainen R, Välkkynen P, Sairanen E, Lappalainen P, Karhunen L, Peuhkuri K, Korpela R, Kolehmainen M, Ermes M. Usage and dose response of a mobile acceptance and commitment therapy app: Secondary analysis of the intervention arm of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jul 28;4(3):e90. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5241.
    1. Ly KH, Asplund K, Andersson G. Stress management for middle managers via an acceptance and commitment-based smartphone application: A randomized controlled trial. Internet Interv. 2014 Jul;1(3):95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2014.06.003.
    1. Bricker JB, Mull KE, Kientz JA, Vilardaga R, Mercer LD, Akioka KJ, Heffner JL. Randomized, controlled pilot trial of a smartphone app for smoking cessation using acceptance and commitment therapy. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Oct 01;143:87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.006.
    1. Ahtinen A, Mattila E, Välkkynen P, Kaipainen K, Vanhala T, Ermes M, Sairanen E, Myllymäki T, Lappalainen R. Mobile mental wellness training for stress management: Feasibility and design implications based on a one-month field study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2013 Jul 10;1(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2596.
    1. Levin ME, Haeger JA, Pierce BG, Twohig MP. Web-based acceptance and commitment therapy for mental health problems in college students: A randomized controlled trial. Behav Modif. 2017 Jan 01;41(1):141–162. doi: 10.1177/0145445516659645.
    1. Polk KL, Schoendorff B, Webster M, Olaz FO. The Essential Guide to the ACT Matrix: A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the ACT Matrix Model in Clinical Practice. Oakland, CA: Context Press; 2016.
    1. Dindo L, Recober A, Marchman J, O'Hara MW, Turvey C. One-day behavioral intervention in depressed migraine patients: Effects on headache. Headache. 2014 Mar;54(3):528–538. doi: 10.1111/head.12258.
    1. Dindo L, Recober A, Marchman JN, Turvey C, O'Hara MW. One-day behavioral treatment for patients with comorbid depression and migraine: A pilot study. Behav Res Ther. 2012 Sep;50(9):537–543. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.05.007.
    1. Liao P, Klasnja P, Tewari A, Murphy SA. Sample size calculations for micro-randomized trials in mHealth. Stat Med. 2016 May 30;35(12):1944–1971. doi: 10.1002/sim.6847.
    1. Klasnja P, Hekler EB, Shiffman S, Boruvka A, Almirall D, Tewari A, Murphy SA. Microrandomized trials: An experimental design for developing just-in-time adaptive interventions. Health Psychol. 2015 Dec;34S:1220–1228. doi: 10.1037/hea0000305.
    1. Nahum-Shani I, Smith SN, Spring BJ, Collins LM, Witkiewitz K, Tewari A, Murphy SA. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: Key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Ann Behav Med. 2018 May 18;52(6):446–462. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8.
    1. Klasnja P, Smith S, Seewald N, Lee A, Hall K, Luers B, Hekler EB, Murphy SA. Efficacy of contextually tailored suggestions for physical activity: A micro-randomized optimization trial of HeartSteps. Ann Behav Med. 2019 May 03;53(6):573–582. doi: 10.1093/abm/kay067.
    1. Rabbi M, Philyaw Kotov M, Cunningham R, Bonar EE, Nahum-Shani I, Klasnja P, Walton M, Murphy S. Toward increasing engagement in substance use data collection: Development of the Substance Abuse Research Assistant app and protocol for a microrandomized trial using adolescents and emerging adults. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jul 18;7(7):e166. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9850.
    1. Kramer J, Künzler F, Mishra V, Presset B, Kotz D, Smith S, Scholz U, Kowatsch T. Investigating intervention components and exploring states of receptivity for a smartphone app to promote physical activity: Protocol of a microrandomized trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jan 31;8(1):e11540. doi: 10.2196/11540.
    1. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385–396. doi: 10.2307/2136404.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606–613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
    1. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: Reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry. 1978 Nov;133(5):429–435. doi: 10.1192/bjp.133.5.429.
    1. Williams JBW. Structured interview guides for the Hamilton Rating Scales. In: Bech P, Coppen A, editors. The Hamilton Scales. Psychopharmacology Series. Volume 9. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1990. pp. 48–63.
    1. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.
    1. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, Amtmann D, Bode R, Buysse D, Choi S, Cook K, Devellis R, DeWalt D, Fries JF, Gershon R, Hahn EA, Lai J, Pilkonis P, Revicki D, Rose M, Weinfurt K, Hays R, PROMIS Cooperative Group The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011.
    1. Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, Waltz T, Zettle RD. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676–688. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007.
    1. Francis AW, Dawson DL, Golijani-Moghaddam N. The development and validation of the Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (CompACT) J Contextual Behav Sci. 2016 Jul;5(3):134–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.05.003.
    1. Cochran A, Belman-Wells L, McInnis M. Engagement strategies for self-monitoring symptoms of bipolar disorder with mobile and wearable technology: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 May 10;7(5):e130. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9899.
    1. Van Til K, McInnis MG, Cochran A. A comparative study of engagement in mobile and wearable health monitoring for bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2020 Mar;22(2):182–190. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12849.
    1. Blanco C, Okuda M, Wright C, Hasin DS, Grant BF, Liu S, Olfson M. Mental health of college students and their non-college-attending peers: Results from the National Epidemiologic Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;65(12):1429–1437. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1429.
    1. Stebleton MJ, Soria KM, Huesman RL. First-generation students' sense of belonging, mental health, and use of counseling services at public research universities. J Coll Couns. 2014 Apr 02;17(1):6–20. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1882.2014.00044.x.
    1. Cohen S. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: Spacapan S, Oskamp S, editors. The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. The Social Psychology of Health. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1988. pp. 31–67.
    1. Sample size calculator for micro-randomized trials. . [2020-08-01].
    1. Boruvka A, Almirall D, Witkiewitz K, Murphy SA. Assessing time-varying causal effect moderation in mobile health. J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(523):1112–1121. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1305274.
    1. Merikangas KR, Jin R, He J, Kessler RC, Lee S, Sampson NA, Viana MC, Andrade LH, Hu C, Karam EG, Ladea M, Medina-Mora ME, Ono Y, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Wells JE, Zarkov Z. Prevalence and correlates of bipolar spectrum disorder in the world mental health survey initiative. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Mar;68(3):241–251. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.12.
    1. Malkoff-Schwartz S, Frank E, Anderson B, Sherrill JT, Siegel L, Patterson D, Kupfer DJ. Stressful life events and social rhythm disruption in the onset of manic and depressive bipolar episodes: A preliminary investigation. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Aug;55(8):702–707. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.8.702.
    1. McInnis M, Assari S, Kamali M, Ryan K, Langenecker SA, Saunders EFH, Versha K, Evans S, O'Shea KS, Mower Provost E, Marshall D, Forger D, Deldin P, Zoellner S, Prechter Bipolar Clinical Research Collaborative Cohort profile: The Heinz C Prechter longitudinal study of bipolar disorder. Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 01;47(1):28–28n. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx229.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться