Contextual, Client-Centred Coaching Following a Workshop: Assistants Capacity Building in Special Education

María José López-de-la-Fuente, Pablo Herrero, Rafael García-Foncillas, Eva Mª Gómez-Trullén, María José López-de-la-Fuente, Pablo Herrero, Rafael García-Foncillas, Eva Mª Gómez-Trullén

Abstract

Assistants serve an essential role in special education to support children with disabilities, but they should be properly trained and supervised. The coaching approach represents one trend that has been gradually implemented in occupational therapy (OT) and rehabilitation services. Still, few studies clearly define the coaching intervention, measure the fidelity of coaching practices, or evaluate capacity building of the caregivers in the long term. This quasi-experimental study compared one-on-one coaching in natural environments following a workshop with a training workshop. Both public schools do not have regular OT services. The primary outcome was the assistant's performance, measured with the Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). The secondary outcome was the fidelity of coaching implementation, measured with the Coaching Practices Rating Scale (CPRS). The GAS showed an increased performance of the assistants after the intervention, with significant differences between groups post-intervention (p = 0.015) and large effect size (r = 0.55), but no long-term significant improvements were found at the follow-up (p = 0.072). The CPRS showed an adequate implementation of the five coaching components (joint planning, observation, action, reflection, and feedback), with a total score of 3.5 ± 0.72 (mean ± SD). The results suggest that coaching sessions provided by OTs in schools may improve assistants' skills to facilitate the student's participation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04747210.

Keywords: coaching; fidelity coaching practices; paraprofessionals/special needs assistants; participation; school-based occupational therapy.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean GAS T-scores pre- and post-intervention. Intervention G: GAS1 mean = 23.3 (SD 0.74); GAS2 mean = 51.4 (SD 11.44). Control G: GAS1 mean = 24.0 (SD 2.58); GAS2 mean = 34.9 (SD 6.83).

References

    1. Lee H., Morningstar M.E. Exploring Predictors of Community Participation Among Young Adults with Severe Disabilities. Res. Pr. Pers. Sev. Disabil. 2019;44:186–199. doi: 10.1177/1540796919863650.
    1. World Health Organization . International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2001.
    1. Bonnard M., Anaby D. Enabling participation of students through school-based occupational therapy services: Towards a broader scope of practice. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 2015;79:188–192. doi: 10.1177/0308022615612807.
    1. Darrah J., Law M.C., Pollock N., Wilson B., Dianne J., Walter S.D., Rosenbaum P., Galuppi B., Russell D.J. Context therapy: A new intervention approach for children with cerebral palsy. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2011;53:615–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03959.x.
    1. Di Marino E., Tremblay S., Khetani M., Anaby D. The effect of child, family and environmental factors on the participation of young children with disabilities. Disabil. Health J. 2018;11:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.05.005.
    1. Kaelin V.C., Ray-Kaeser S., Moioli S., Stalder C.K., Santinelli L., Echsel A., Schulze C. Occupational Therapy Practice in Mainstream Schools: Results from an Online Survey in Switzerland. Occup. Ther. Int. 2019;2019:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2019/3647397.
    1. Hutton E., Tuppeny S., Hasselbusch A. Making a case for universal and targeted children’s occupational therapy in the United Kingdom. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 2016;79:450–453. doi: 10.1177/0308022615618218.
    1. Hasselbusch A., Penman M. Working Together an Occupational Therapy Perspective on Collaborative Consultation. Kairaranga. 2008;9:24–31.
    1. Ball M.A. Revitalizing the OT role in school-based practice: Promoting success for all students. J. Occup. Ther. Sch. Early Interv. 2018;11:263–272. doi: 10.1080/19411243.2018.1445059.
    1. Vaz D.V., Silva P.L., Mancini M.C., Carello C., Kinsella-Shaw J. Towards an ecologically grounded functional practice in rehabilitation. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2017;52:117–132. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.01.010.
    1. Villeneuve M. A critical examination of school-based occupational therapy collaborative consultation. Can. J. Occup. Ther. 2009;76:206–218. doi: 10.1177/000841740907600s05.
    1. Giangreco M.F. Working with Paraprofessionals. Educ. Leadersh. 2003;61:50–53.
    1. Giangreco M.F., Yuan S., McKenzie B., Cameron P., Fialka J. “Be Careful What You Wish for …”: Five Reasons to be concerned about the Assignment of Individual Paraprofessionals. Teach. Except. Child. 2005;37:28–34. doi: 10.1177/004005990503700504.
    1. Howley C., Howley A., Telfer D. Special Education Paraprofessionals in District Context. Mid-West. Educ. Res. 2017;29:136–165.
    1. Brock M.E., Carter E.W. Effects of a Professional Development Package to Prepare Special Education Paraprofessionals to Implement Evidence-Based Practice. J. Spéc. Educ. 2015;49:39–51. doi: 10.1177/0022466913501882.
    1. Hemmingsson H., Borell L., Gustavsson A. Participation in School: School Assistants Creating Opportunities and Obstacles for Pupils with Disabilities. OTJR Occup. Particip. Health. 2003;23:88–98. doi: 10.1177/153944920302300302.
    1. Huang C.-Y., Tseng M.-H., Chen K.-L., Shieh J.-Y., Lu L. Determinants of school activity performance in children with cerebral palsy: A multidimensional approach using the ICF-CY as a framework. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2013;34:4025–4033. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.08.022.
    1. Keating S., O’Connor U. The shifting role of the special needs assistant in Irish classrooms: A time for change? Eur. J. Spéc. Needs Educ. 2012;27:533–5442. doi: 10.1080/08856257.2012.711960.
    1. Mäensivu K.-T., Uusiautti S., Määttä K. Special Needs Assistants—The Special Characteristic and Strength of the School System of Finland. Eur. J. Educ. Res. 2012;1:23–36. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.1.1.23.
    1. Brock M.E., Carter E.W. A Systematic Review of Paraprofessional-Delivered Educational Practices to Improve Outcomes for Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Res. Pr. Pers. Sev. Disabil. 2013;38:211–221. doi: 10.1177/154079691303800401.
    1. Koegel R.L., Kim S., Koegel L.K. Training Paraprofessionals to Improve Socialization in Students with ASD. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2014;44:2197–2208. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2094-x.
    1. Anaby D., Law M., Teplicky R., Turner L. Focusing on the Environment to Improve Youth Participation: Experiences and Perspectives of Occupational Therapists. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12:13388–13398. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121013388.
    1. Schwellnus H., King G., Thompson L. Client-centred coaching in the paediatric health professions: A critical scoping review. Disabil. Rehabil. 2014;37:1305–1315. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.962105.
    1. Kessler D., Graham F. The use of coaching in occupational therapy: An integrative review. Aust. Occup. Ther. J. 2015;62:160–176. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12175.
    1. Ward R., Reynolds J.E., Pieterse B., Elliott C., Boyd R., Miller L. Utilisation of coaching practices in early interventions in children at risk of developmental disability/delay: A systematic review. Disabil. Rehabil. 2020;42:2846–2867. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1581846.
    1. Kemp P., Turnbull A.P. Coaching with Parents in Early Intervention: An Interdisciplinary Research Synthesis. Infants Young Child. 2014;27:305–324. doi: 10.1097/IYC.0000000000000018.
    1. Ziegler S.A., Hadders-Algra M. Coaching approaches in early intervention and paediatric rehabilitation. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2020;62:569–574. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14493.
    1. Tork H., Dassen T., Lohrmann C. Care dependency of children in Egypt. J. Clin. Nurs. 2008;17:287–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01949.x.
    1. Tork H., Dassen T., Lohrmann C. Care dependency of hospitalized children: Testing the Care Dependency Scale for Paediatrics in a cross-cultural comparison. J. Adv. Nurs. 2009;65:435–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04863.x.
    1. Kiresuk T.J., Sherman R.E. Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Ment. Health J. 1968;4:443–453. doi: 10.1007/BF01530764.
    1. Ottenbacher K.J., Cusick A. Goal Attainment Scaling as a Method of Clinical Service Evaluation. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 1990;44:519–525. doi: 10.5014/ajot.44.6.519.
    1. Spence G.B. GAS Powered Coaching: Coaching Research and Practice. Int. Coach. Psychol. Rev. 2007;2:155–167.
    1. Rush D.D., Shelden M.L. Coaching Practices Rating Scale for Assessing Adherence to Evidence-Based Early Childhood Intervention Practices. Case Tools. 2006;2:1–7.
    1. Rush D.D., Shelden M.L. In: The Early Childhood Coaching Handbook. Paul H., editor. Brookes; Baltimore, MD, USA: 2011.
    1. Rush D.D., Shelden M.L. Validity of the Coaching Practices Rating Scale. CASEinPoint. 2006;2:1–7.
    1. Rush D.D., Shelden M.L., Hanft B.E. Coaching Families and Colleagues: A Process for Collaboration in Natural Settings. Infants Young Child. 2003;16:33–47. doi: 10.1097/00001163-200301000-00005.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ, USA: 1988.
    1. Walker V.L., Douglas K.H., Chung Y.C. An Evaluation of Paraprofessionals’ Skills and Training Needs in Supporting Students with Severe Disabilities. Int. J. Spec. Educ. 2017;32:460–471.
    1. Bose P., Hinojosa J. Reported Experiences from Occupational Therapists Interacting with Teachers in Inclusive Early Childhood Classrooms. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2008;62:289–297. doi: 10.5014/ajot.62.3.289.
    1. Hutton E. Occupational Therapy in Mainstream Primary Schools: An Evaluation of a Pilot Project. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 2009;72:308–313. doi: 10.1177/030802260907200707.
    1. Dunn W., Cox J., Foster L., Mische-Lawson L., Tanquary J. Impact of a Contextual Intervention on Child Participation and Parent Competence Among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Pretest-Posttest Repeated-Measures Design. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2012;66:520–528. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2012.004119.
    1. Anaby D., Hand C., Bradley L., DiRezze B., Forhan M., Digiacomo A., Law M. The effect of the environment on participation of children and youth with disabilities: A scoping review. Disabil. Rehabil. 2013;35:1589–1598. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.748840.
    1. Trivette C.M., Dunst C.J., Hamby D.W., O’herin C.E. Characteristics and Consequences of Adult Learning Methods and Strategies. Res. Brief. 2009;3:1–32.
    1. Graham F., Rodger S., Ziviani J. Effectiveness of Occupational Performance Coaching in Improving Children’s and Mothers’ Performance and Mothers’ Self-Competence. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2012;67:10–18. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.004648.
    1. Hui C., Snider L., Couture M. Self-regulation workshop and Occupational Performance Coaching with teachers: A pilot study. Can. J. Occup. Ther. 2016;83:115–125. doi: 10.1177/0008417415627665.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться