Geographic Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Bernard Combe, Robin Besuyen, Antonio Gómez-Centeno, Tsukasa Matsubara, Juan José Sancho Jimenez, Zhaoyu Yin, Maya H Buch, Bernard Combe, Robin Besuyen, Antonio Gómez-Centeno, Tsukasa Matsubara, Juan José Sancho Jimenez, Zhaoyu Yin, Maya H Buch

Abstract

Introduction: Global clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often do not recruit enough patients from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds to identify any potential differences in treatment outcome across such groups. To overcome this limitation, using data from five previous clinical trials and two ongoing trial extensions, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with RA across geographic regions.

Methods: This was a post hoc, exploratory analysis of data from male and female patients with RA meeting the 2010 RA criteria as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology. Data were analyzed from phase 2 (DARWIN 1-2) and phase 3 (FINCH 1-3) clinical trials, as well as two long-term extension studies (DARWIN 3, FINCH 4), of filgotinib. Efficacy endpoints included ACR 20%/50%/70% improvement (ACR20/50/70) responses, disease activity score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein [DAS28(CRP)], Clinical Disease Activity Index scores, Boolean remission, and change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Safety data were presented as exposure-adjusted incidence rates per 100 patient-years of exposure of treatment-emergent adverse events.

Results: Compared with placebo, at week 12 a greater proportion of patients receiving filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) or 100 mg (FIL100) achieved ACR20 (p < 0.01), with similar outcomes in most regions. Overall, the reduction in HAQ-DI with FIL200 or FIL100 was greater than with placebo (p < 0.05) at week 12. Compared with placebo, at week 24 the proportions of patients achieving DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2 were greater for both doses of FIL, as seen in most regions (p < 0.01). Safety outcomes did not indicate regional or ethnic differences in the safety profile of filgotinib.

Conclusion: Filgotinib efficacy and safety in patients with RA were generally consistent across geographic regions.

Gov trial registration numbers: NCT02889796; NCT02873936; NCT02886728; NCT03025308; NCT01888874; NCT01894516; NCT02065700.

Keywords: Adverse effects; Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; Filgotinib; Outcomes; Rheumatoid arthritis.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pooled efficacy data for a ACR20, b HAQ-DI, c DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2, and d DAS28(CRP) < 2.6. Other = South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, and Israel. For ACR20 and DAS28(CRP), 95% CIs and P values were calculated from the logistic regression with treatment groups, stratification factors, subgroup, study, and treatment by subgroup included in the model. For HAQ-DI, the MMRM included treatment, visit (as categorical variable), subgroup, treatment by visit, treatment by subgroup, baseline value, stratification factors, and study as fixed effects, and patients as the random effect. LS mean, 95% CI, and P value were obtained from the MMRM. The common stratification factor is prior exposure to bDMARDs for the analysis through week 12 and includes prior exposure to bDMARDs and presence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide or rheumatoid factor for the analysis through week 24. ACR20 American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement, bDMARD biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, CI confidence interval, DAS28(CRP) disease activity score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein, FIL100/200 filgotinib 100 mg/200 mg, HAQ-DI Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index, LS least squares, MMRM mixed effects model for repeated measures, OR odds ratio
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
EAIR of a serious infections, b herpes zosterb, c malignancy other than NMSC (long-term, as-treated), d major adverse cardiovascular events, and e venous thromboembolism. Other = South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, and Israel. aThe Poisson model was not adjusted by study, except when any study had zero events within the treatment. bData reported in Winthrop et al. 2022 [19]. CI confidence interval, EAIR exposure-adjusted incidence rate, FIL100/200 filgotinib 100 mg/200 mg, NMSC nonmelanoma skin cancer, PYE patient-years of exposure

References

    1. Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Hoy D, et al. Global, regional and national burden of rheumatoid arthritis 1990–2017: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2017. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:1463–1471. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215920.
    1. Almutairi K, Nossent J, Preen D, Keen H, Inderjeeth C. The global prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis based on a systematic review. Rheumatol Int. 2021;41:863–877. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04731-0.
    1. Almoallim H, Al Saleh J, Badsha H, et al. A review of the prevalence and unmet needs in the management of rheumatoid arthritis in Africa and the Middle East. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00252-1.
    1. Shapira Y, Agmon-Levin N, Shoenfeld Y. Geoepidemiology of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6:468–476. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.86.
    1. Massardo L, Pons-Estel BA, Wojdyla D, et al. Early rheumatoid arthritis in Latin America: low socioeconomic status related to high disease activity at baseline. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:1135–1143.
    1. Burgos-Vargas R, Catoggio LJ, Galarza-Maldonado C, Ostojich K, Cardiel MH. Current therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: a Latin American perspective. Reumatol Clin. 2013;9:106–112. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2012.09.001.
    1. Keebler D, Teng E, Chia J, Galanter J, Peake J, Tuckwell K. Regional variations in adverse event reporting rates and ACR responses in placebo/standard-of-care arms of rheumatoid arthritis trials. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020;59:3023–3031. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa043.
    1. Strait A, Castillo F, Choden S, et al. Demographic characteristics of participants in rheumatoid arthritis randomized clinical trials: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1914745. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14745.
    1. Hodkinson B, Tikly M, Adebajo A. Rheumatoid arthritis in the developing world: stepping up to the challenge. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33:1195–1196. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2690-3.
    1. Kalo Z, Voko Z, Ostor A, et al. Patient access to reimbursed biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the European region. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017;5:1345580. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2017.1345580.
    1. Kim ES, Keam SJ. Filgotinib in rheumatoid arthritis: a profile of its use. Clin Drug Investig. 2021;41:741–749. doi: 10.1007/s40261-021-01055-0.
    1. Gilead Sciences. Jyseleca: summary of product characteristics. 2020. . Accessed 28 Sep 2021.
    1. Combe B, Kivitz A, Tanaka Y, et al. Filgotinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase III randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:848–858. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219214.
    1. Genovese MC, Kalunian K, Gottenberg JE, et al. Effect of filgotinib vs placebo on clinical response in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis refractory to disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy: the FINCH 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322:315–325. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9055.
    1. Westhovens R, Taylor PC, Alten R, et al. Filgotinib (GLPG0634/GS-6034), an oral JAK1 selective inhibitor, is effective in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and insufficient response to MTX: results from a randomised, dose-finding study (DARWIN 1) Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:998–1008. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210104.
    1. Kavanaugh A, Kremer J, Ponce L, et al. Filgotinib (GLPG0634/GS-6034), an oral selective JAK1 inhibitor, is effective as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results from a randomised, dose-finding study (DARWIN 2) Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:1009–1019. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210105.
    1. Kavanaugh A, Westhovens RR, Winthrop KL, et al. Safety and efficacy of filgotinib: up to 4-year results from an open-label extension study of Phase II rheumatoid arthritis programs. J Rheumatol. 2021;48:1230–1238. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.201183.
    1. . Long term extension study to assess the safety and efficacy of filgotinib in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (FINCH 4). NCT03025308. 2021. . Accessed 1 Mar 2022.
    1. Winthrop KL, Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, et al. Integrated safety analysis of filgotinib in patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis receiving treatment over a median of 1.6 years. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81:184–192. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221051.
    1. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:2569–2581. doi: 10.1002/art.27584.
    1. Westhovens R, Rigby WFC, van der Heijde D, et al. Filgotinib in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and limited or no prior exposure to methotrexate: the phase 3, randomised controlled FINCH 3 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:727–738. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219213.
    1. Crowson CS, Liao KP, Davis JM, 3rd, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 2013;166:622–8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.07.010.
    1. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner (India). Age structure and marital status. 2001. . Accessed 1 Mar 2022.
    1. The World Bank. Population ages 65 and above (% of total population) - Thailand. 2019. . Accessed 1 Mar 2022.
    1. Department of Statistics (Malaysia). Current population etimates, Malaysia, 2021. . Accessed 1 Mar 2022.
    1. Brennan-Olsen SL, Cook S, Leech MT, et al. Prevalence of arthritis according to age, sex and socioeconomic status in six low and middle income countries: analysis of data from the World Health Organization study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE) Wave 1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:271. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1624-z.
    1. Gianfrancesco M, Li J, Ja C, Seet A, Schmajuk G, Yazdany A. Effectiveness of TNFi versus non-TNFi biologics on disease activity in obese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from the ACR’s RISE registry. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(suppl 10):Abstract 588.
    1. Barton JL, Trupin L, Schillinger D, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in disease activity and function among persons with rheumatoid arthritis from university-affiliated clinics. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:1238–1246. doi: 10.1002/acr.20525.
    1. Ridker PM, Miletich JP, Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Ethnic distribution of factor V Leiden in 4047 men and women. Implications for venous thromboembolism screening. JAMA. 1997;277:1305–1307. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03540400055031.
    1. Yates M, Mootoo A, Adas M, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk with JAK inhibitors: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73:779–788. doi: 10.1002/art.41580.
    1. Taylor PC, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, et al. Baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:652–662. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1608345.
    1. Winthrop KL, Curtis JR, Lindsey S, et al. Herpes zoster and tofacitinib: clinical outcomes and the risk of concomitant therapy. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:1960–1968. doi: 10.1002/art.40189.
    1. Lee EB, Yamanaka H, Liu Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients from the Asia-Pacific region: post-hoc analyses of pooled clinical study data. Int J Rheum Dis. 2019;22:1094–1106. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13516.
    1. Winthrop KL, Nash P, Yamaoka K, et al. Incidence and risk factors for herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving upadacitinib: a pooled analysis of six phase III clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81:206–213. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220822.
    1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2982–3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010.
    1. Zhang Z, Deng W, Wu Q, Sun L. Tuberculosis, hepatitis B and herpes zoster in tofacitinib-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Immunotherapy. 2019;11:321–333. doi: 10.2217/imt-2018-0113.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться