Midwives' Management during the Second Stage of Labor in Relation to Second-Degree Tears-An Experimental Study

Malin Edqvist, Ingegerd Hildingsson, Margareta Mollberg, Ingela Lundgren, Helena Lindgren, Malin Edqvist, Ingegerd Hildingsson, Margareta Mollberg, Ingela Lundgren, Helena Lindgren

Abstract

Introduction: Most women who give birth for the first time experience some form of perineal trauma. Second-degree tears contribute to long-term consequences for women and are a risk factor for occult anal sphincter injuries. The objective of this study was to evaluate a multifaceted midwifery intervention designed to reduce second-degree tears among primiparous women.

Methods: An experimental cohort study where a multifaceted intervention consisting of 1) spontaneous pushing, 2) all birth positions with flexibility in the sacro-iliac joints, and 3) a two-step head-to-body delivery was compared with standard care. Crude and Adjusted OR (95% CI) were calculated between the intervention and the standard care group, for the various explanatory variables.

Results: A total of 597 primiparous women participated in the study, 296 in the intervention group and 301 in the standard care group. The prevalence of second-degree tears was lower in the intervention group: [Adj. OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.33-0.84)]. A low prevalence of episiotomy was found in both groups (1.7 and 3.0%). The prevalence of epidural analgesia was 61.1 percent. Despite the high use of epidural analgesia, the midwives in the intervention group managed to use the intervention.

Conclusion: It is possible to reduce second-degree tears among primiparous women with the use of a multifaceted midwifery intervention without increasing the prevalence of episiotomy. Furthermore, the intervention is possible to employ in larger maternity wards with midwives caring for women with both low- and high-risk pregnancies.

Keywords: birth position; midwifery intervention; second-degree tears; spontaneous pushing; two-step delivery.

© 2016 The Authors. Birth published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the inclusion process in an intervention study to minimize second‐degree tears during labor, Stockhom, Sweden, 2013–2015.

References

    1. Samuelsson E, Ladfors L, Lindblom BG, Hagberg H. A prospective observational study on tears during vaginal delivery: Occurrences and risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81(1):44–49.
    1. de Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HC. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG 2001;108(4):383–387.
    1. Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Jones PW. Evaluation of postpartum perineal pain and dyspareunia–A prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;137(2):152–156.
    1. Dannecker C, Hillemanns P, Strauss A, et al. Episiotomy and perineal tears presumed to be imminent: Randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83(4):364–368.
    1. Radestad I, Olsson A, Nissen E, Rubertsson C. Tears in the vagina, perineum, sphincter ani, and rectum and first sexual intercourse after childbirth: A nationwide follow‐up. Birth (Berkeley, Calif) 2008;35(2):98–106.
    1. Rathfisch G, Dikencik BK, Kizilkaya Beji N. Effects of perineal trauma on postpartum sexual function. J Adv Nurs 2010;66(12):2640–2649.
    1. Tegerstedt G, Miedel A, Maehle‐Schmidt M, et al. Obstetric risk factors for symptomatic prolapse: A population‐based approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194(1):75–81.
    1. Rodriguez‐Mias NL, Martinez‐Franco E, Aguado J, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, do they share the same risk factors? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015;190:52–57.
    1. Beck DE, Allen NL. Rectocele. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2010;23(2):90–98.
    1. Corton MM, McIntire DD, Twickler DM, et al. Endoanal ultrasound for detection of sphincter defects following childbirth. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24(4):627–635.
    1. Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Occult anal sphincter injuries\xF6Myth or reality? BJOG 2006;113(2):195–200.
    1. Sampselle CM, Hines S. Spontaneous pushing during birth. Relationship to perineal outcomes. J Nurse Midwifery 1999;44(1):36–39.
    1. Prins M, Boxem J, Lucas C, Hutton E. Effect of spontaneous pushing versus Valsalva pushing in the second stage of labour on mother and fetus: A systematic review of randomised trials. BJOG 2011;118(6):662–670.
    1. Lemos A, Amorim MM, deDornelas Andrade A , et al. Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;10:Cd009124.
    1. Aasheim V, Nilsen AB, Lukasse M, Reinar LM. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;12:Cd006672.
    1. Gottvall K, Allebeck P, Ekeus C. Risk factors for anal sphincter tears: The importance of maternal position at birth. BJOG 2007;114(10):1266–1272.
    1. Elvander C, Ahlberg M, Thies‐Lagergren L, et al. Birth position and obstetric anal sphincter injury: A population‐based study of 113 000 spontaneous births. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:252.
    1. Albers LL, Sedler KD, Bedrick EJ, et al. Midwifery care measures in the second stage of labor and reduction of genital tract trauma at birth: A randomized trial. J Midwifery Womens Health 2005;50(5):365–372.
    1. Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ, Shehmar M. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;5:Cd002006.
    1. Kemp E, Kingswood CJ, Kibuka M, Thornton JG. Position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;1:Cd008070.
    1. Lindgren HE, Brink A, Klinberg‐Allvin M. Fear causes tears—Perineal injuries in home birth settings. A Swedish interview study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011;11:6.
    1. McPherson KC, Beggs AD, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Can the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) be predicted using a risk‐scoring system? BMC Res Notes 2014;7:471.
    1. Hutton EK, Cappelletti A, Reitsma AH, et al. Outcomes associated with planned place of birth among women with low‐risk pregnancies. CMAJ 2016;188(5):E80–E90.
    1. Larkin P, Begley CM, Devane D. Women's experiences of labour and birth: An evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery 2009;25(2):e49–e59.
    1. Hunter LP. Being with woman: A guiding concept for the care of laboring women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002;31(6):650–657.
    1. Berg M, Asta Olafsdottir O, Lundgren I. A midwifery model of woman‐centred childbirth care\xF6In Swedish and Icelandic settings. Sexual Reprod Healthcare: Official J Swedish Assoc Midwives 2012;3(2):79–87.
    1. Fernando RJ, Sultan AH, Freeman RM, Adams EJ. The Management of Third‐ and Fourth‐Degree Perineal Tears. 2015. Accessed August 1, 2016. Available at: .
    1. Olsson A. Perineal trauma and suturing In: Lindgren H, Christensson K, Dykes A‐K, eds. Reproductive Health: The Midwife's Core Competencencies. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2016:512.
    1. McCandlish R, Bowler U, van Asten H, et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105(12):1262–1272.
    1. Laine K, Pirhonen T, Rolland R, Pirhonen J. Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears during delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111(5):1053–1057.
    1. Kotaska A, Campbell K. Two‐step delivery may avoid shoulder dystocia: Head‐to‐body delivery interval is less important than we think. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014;36(8):716–720.
    1. Sultan AH, Fenner DE, Thakar R. Perineal and Anal Sphincter Trauma [electronic resource] Diagnosis and Clinical Management. London: Springer‐Verlag London Limited, 2007.
    1. Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;1:Cd000081.
    1. Poulsen MO, Madsen ML, Skriver‐Moller AC, Overgaard C. Does the Finnish intervention prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries? A systematic review of the literature. BMJ Open 2015;5(9):e008346.
    1. Priddis H, Dahlen H, Schmied V. What are the facilitators, inhibitors, and implications of birth positioning? A review of the literature. Women Birth 2012;25(3):100–106.
    1. Gravel K, Legare F, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision‐making in clinical practice: A systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Implementation Science: IS 2006;1:16.
    1. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, et al. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci 2012;7(1):1–17.
    1. Ott J, Gritsch E, Pils S, et al. A retrospective study on perineal lacerations in vaginal delivery and the individual performance of experienced midwives. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:270.
    1. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? JAMA 1999;282(15):1458–1465.
    1. Statistics Sweden. Finland and Iraq—The most common countries of birth among citizens born outside Sweden . 2016. Accessed August 1, 2016. Available at: .

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться