Designing and evaluating a novel mobile application for Helping Babies Breathe skills retention in Uganda: comparative study protocol

Hasan Shamsh Merali, Natalie Hoi-Man Chan, Niraj Mistry, Ryan Kealey, Douglas Campbell, Shaun K Morris, Santorino Data, Hasan Shamsh Merali, Natalie Hoi-Man Chan, Niraj Mistry, Ryan Kealey, Douglas Campbell, Shaun K Morris, Santorino Data

Abstract

Introduction: Over 600 000 newborns die each year of intrapartum-related events, many of which are preventable in the presence of skilled birth attendants. Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) is a neonatal resuscitation training programme designed for low-resource settings that can reduce both early neonatal mortality and stillbirths. However, as in other similar educational programmes, knowledge and skill retention deteriorate over time. This trend may be counteracted by strategies such as regular simulated exercises. In this study, a mobile application (app) 'HBB Prompt' will be developed to assist providers in retaining HBB knowledge and skills.

Methods and analysis: This is a comparative study in Uganda with two phases: an app development phase and an assessment phase. In the first phase, HBB trainers and providers will explore barriers and facilitators to enhance learning and maintenance of HBB skills and knowledge through focus group discussions (FGDs). The FGDs are designed with a human factors perspective, enabling collection of relevant data for the prototype version of HBB Prompt. The app will then undergo usability and feasibility testing through FGDs and simulations. In the second phase, a minimum of 10 healthcare workers from two district hospitals will receive HBB training. Only the intervention hospital will have access to HBB Prompt. All participants will be asked to practise HBB skills every shift and record this in a logbook. In the intervention site, app usage data will also be collected. The primary outcome will be comparing skills retention 12 months after training, as determined by Objective Structured Clinical Examination B scores.

Ethics and dissemination: This study received ethics approval from The Hospital for Sick Children and Mbarara University of Science and Technology. The authors plan to publish all relevant findings from this study in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: NCT03577054.

Keywords: Helping Babies Breathe; Uganda; mobile application; newborn resuscitation; simulation.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: SD is a co-creator of the Augmented Infant Resuscitator. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic for phase I: development of Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) Prompt app through user-centred design. Iterative process of user-centred design that each new version of HBB Prompt goes through, starting with specifying context of use, specifying user requirements, then co-designing of solutions to address needs identified, followed finally by evaluating whether the requirements were met through simulations and focus group discussions (FGDs). The final version of HBB Prompt to be used in phase II will be available once all the identified requirements are addressed to satisfaction. Figure adapted from the International Organization of Standardization.

References

    1. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, et al. . Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the sustainable development goals. Lancet 2016;388:3027–35. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31593-8
    1. Boerma T, Requejo J, Victora CG, et al. . Countdown to 2030: tracking progress towards universal coverage for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health. Lancet 2018;391:1538–48. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30104-1
    1. Ariff S, Lee AC, Lawn J, et al. . Global burden, epidemiologic trends, and prevention of intrapartum-related deaths in low-resource settings. Clin Perinatol 2016;43:593–608. 10.1016/j.clp.2016.05.001
    1. Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Escobedo MB, et al. . Part 13: neonatal resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (reprint). Pediatrics 2015;136 Suppl 2:S196–S218. 10.1542/peds.2015-3373G
    1. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, et al. . Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet 2014;384:347–70. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60792-3
    1. Kamath-Rayne BD, Thukral A, Visick MK, et al. . Helping Babies Breathe, second edition: a model for strengthening educational programs to increase global newborn survival. Glob Health Sci Pract 2018;6:538–51. 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00147
    1. Msemo G, Massawe A, Mmbando D, et al. . Newborn mortality and fresh stillbirth rates in Tanzania after helping babies breathe training. Pediatrics 2013;131:e353–60. 10.1542/peds.2012-1795
    1. Goudar SS, Somannavar MS, Clark R, et al. . Stillbirth and newborn mortality in India after helping babies breathe training. Pediatrics 2013;131:e344–52. 10.1542/peds.2012-2112
    1. Kc A, Wrammert J, Clark RB, et al. . Reducing perinatal mortality in Nepal using Helping Babies Breathe. Pediatrics 2016;137:e20150117 10.1542/peds.2015-0117
    1. Reisman J, Arlington L, Jensen L, et al. . Newborn resuscitation training in resource-limited settings: a systematic literature review. Pediatrics 2016;138:e20154490 10.1542/peds.2015-4490
    1. Kc A, Wrammert J, Nelin V, et al. . Evaluation of Helping Babies Breathe Quality Improvement Cycle (HBB-QIC) on retention of neonatal resuscitation skills six months after training in Nepal. BMC Pediatr 2017;17:103 10.1186/s12887-017-0853-5
    1. Tabangin ME, Josyula S, Taylor KK, et al. . Resuscitation skills after helping babies breathe training: a comparison of varying practice frequency and impact on retention of skills in different types of providers. Int Health 2018;10:163–71. 10.1093/inthealth/ihy017
    1. Arabi AME, Ibrahim SA, Ahmed SE, et al. . Skills retention in Sudanese village midwives 1 year following Helping Babies Breathe training. Arch Dis Child 2016;101:439–42. 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309190
    1. Mduma E, Ersdal H, Svensen E, et al. . Frequent brief on-site simulation training and reduction in 24-h neonatal mortality—an educational intervention study. Resuscitation 2015;93:1–7. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.019
    1. Bastawrous A, Armstrong MJ. Mobile health use in low- and high-income countries: an overview of the peer-reviewed literature. J R Soc Med 2013;106:130–42. 10.1177/0141076812472620
    1. Chan NH, Mistry N, Campbell DM. A simulation-based pilot study of a mobile application (NRP prompt) as a cognitive aid for neonatal resuscitation training. Simul Healthc 2019;14:146–56. 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000353
    1. Labrique AB, Vasudevan L, Kochi E, et al. . mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Glob Health Sci Pract 2013;1:160–71. 10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00031
    1. ISO Ergonomics of human–system interaction—Part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems, 2010. Available:
    1. Bennett DJ, Itagaki T, Chenelle CT, et al. . Evaluation of the augmented infant resuscitator: a monitoring device for neonatal bag-valve-mask resuscitation. Anesth Analg 2018;126:947–55. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002432
    1. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed Los Angeles: Sage, 2009.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться