The late effect of intraoperative wound infiltration with local anaesthetic in surgical patients; is there any? A randomized control trial

Abstract

Introduction: Intraoperative wound infiltration with local anaesthetic is commonly used. Apart from the obvious immediate action it has been supported that a possible down regulation of pain receptors may lead to longer effects. Our aim was to compare the use of local anaesthetic versus placebo in order to assess if indeed there is a late beneficial effect.

Methods: We conducted an RCT involving 400 consecutive general surgery patients randomized in 2 groups: Group A = placebo, Group B = wound infiltration with 15 ml of ropivacaine 10%. We recorded the preoperative and postoperative pain for the 1st week as well as the type and quantity of the analgesia used during the study period.

Results: No significant difference was found between the groups in all known confounding factors recorded. No significant difference was found in the intensity of postoperative pain. More people of group A required NSAIDs during the first 3 PO days while more people of Group B required stronger painkillers. For those patients who underwent a non urgent operation and especially laparoscopic surgery higher pain score was recorded in the group B from the 3rd PO day onwards.

Discussion: Intraoperative local infiltration of the wound with local anaesthetic offers no further benefit for the general surgery apart from that of the immediate PO period. There is no late effect for pain control. Considering that during the immediate postoperative period stronger systematic painkillers are given the intraoperative, infiltration of the wound with the local anaesthetic under study offers no obvious benefit.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02171299.

Keywords: Determinants of pain; Local anaesthetic; Pain; Surgery; Wound infiltration.

Copyright © 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.