Erythropoietin in traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Alistair Nichol, Craig French, Lorraine Little, Jeffrey Presneill, D James Cooper, Samir Haddad, Jacques Duranteau, Olivier Huet, Markus Skrifvars, Yaseen Arabi, Rinaldo Bellomo, EPO-TBI Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group, Alistair Nichol, Craig French, Lorraine Little, Jeffrey Presneill, D James Cooper, Samir Haddad, Jacques Duranteau, Olivier Huet, Markus Skrifvars, Yaseen Arabi, Rinaldo Bellomo, EPO-TBI Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Laboratory and clinical studies demonstrate a possible beneficial effect of erythropoietin in improving outcomes in the traumatic brain injury cohort. However, there are concerns regarding the association of erythropoietin and thrombosis in the critically ill. A large-scale, multi-centre, blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomised trial is currently underway to address this hypothesis.

Methods/design: The erythropoietin in traumatic brain injury trial is a stratified prospective, multi-centre, randomised, blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase III trial. It aims to determine whether the administration of erythropoietin compared to placebo improves neurological outcome in patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury at six months after injury. The trial is designed to recruit 606 patients between 15 and 65 years of age with severe (Glasgow Coma Score: 3 to 8) or moderate (Glasgow Coma Score: 9 to 12) traumatic brain injury in Australia, New Zealand, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, France, Finland, Germany and Ireland. Trial patients will receive either subcutaneous erythropoietin or placebo within 24 hours of injury, and weekly thereafter for up to three doses during the intensive care unit admission. The primary outcome will be the combined proportion of unfavourable neurological outcomes at six months: severe disability or death. Secondary outcomes will include the rate of proximal deep venous thrombosis detected by compression Doppler ultrasound, six-month mortality, the proportion of patients with composite vascular events (deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest and cerebrovascular events) at six months and quality of life with health economic evaluations.

Discussion: When completed, the trial aims to provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of erythropoietin in traumatic brain injury patients, and to provide clear guidance for clinicians in their management of this devastating condition.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials registry: ACTRN12609000827235 (registered on 22 September 2009). Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00987454 (registered on 29 September 2009). European Drug Regulatory Authorities Clinical Trials: 2011-005235-22 (registered on 18 January 2012).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of trial treatment and follow up schedule. The baseline ultrasound may be performed before or at least within 48 hours after the first dose administration. EPO, Erythropoietin (Epoetin alfa) 40,000 IU or normal saline placebo; US, Ultrasound.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Blinded tamperproof sealed box.

References

    1. Access Economics. The economic cost of spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury in Australia. Report by Access Economics Pty Limited for The Victorian Neurotrauma Initiative. 2009; last access date 28 Jan 2015. .
    1. Bramlett HM, Dietrich WD. Pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia and brain trauma: similarities and differences. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004;24:133–50. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000111614.19196.04.
    1. Lykissas MG, Korompilias AV, Vekris MD, Mitsionis GI, Sakellariou E, Beris AE. The role of erythropoietin in central and peripheral nerve injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007;109:639–44. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.05.013.
    1. Coleman T, Brines M. Science review: recombinant human erythropoietin in critical illness: a role beyond anemia? Crit Care. 2004;8:337–41. doi: 10.1186/cc2897.
    1. Yatsiv I, Grigoriadis N, Simeonidou C, Stahel PF, Schmidt OI, Alexandrovitch AG, et al. Erythropoietin is neuroprotective, improves functional recovery, and reduces neuronal apoptosis and inflammation in a rodent model of experimental closed head injury. FASEB J. 2005;19:1701–3.
    1. Lu D, Mahmood A, Qu C, Goussev A, Schallert T, Chopp M. Erythropoietin enhances neurogenesis and restores spatial memory in rats after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:1011–7. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.1011.
    1. Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Pearl RG, Fink MP, Levy MM, Shapiro MJ, et al. Efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:2827–35. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2827.
    1. Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Fabian TC, May A, Pearl RG, Heard S, et al. Efficacy and safety of epoetin alfa in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:965–76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071533.
    1. Abrishamkar S, Safavi M, Honarmand A. Effect of erythropoietin on Glasgow Coma Scale and Glasgow Outcome Sale in patient with diffuse axonal injury. J Res Med Sci. 2012;17:51–6.
    1. Talving P, Lustenberger T, Inaba K, Lam L, Mohseni S, Chan L, et al. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent administration and survival after severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective study. Arch Surg. 2012;147:251–5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.1838.
    1. Tonia T, Mettler A, Robert N, Schwarzer G, Seidenfeld J, Weingart O, et al. Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD003407.
    1. Singh AK, Szczech L, Tang KL, Barnhart H, Sapp S, Wolfson M, et al. Correction of anemia with epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2085–98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa065485.
    1. Teasdale GM, Pettigrew LE, Wilson JT, Murray G, Jennett B. Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:587–97. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.587.
    1. Ware J, Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
    1. EuroQol Group. EQ-5D™ instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life. 2014. Last access date 28 Jan 2015. .
    1. Cook DJ, Rocker G, Meade M, Guyatt G, Geerts W, Anderson D, et al. Prophylaxis of Thromboembolism in Critical Care (PROTECT) Trial: a pilot study. J Crit Care. 2005;20:364–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.09.010.
    1. Vincent JL, Baron JF, Reinhart K, Gattinoni L, Thijs L, Webb A, et al. Anemia and blood transfusion in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2002;288:1499–507. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.12.1499.
    1. Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Pearl RG, Fink MP, Levy MM, Abraham E, et al. The CRIT Study: anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill - current clinical practice in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:39–52. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000104112.34142.79.
    1. Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(Suppl 1):S1–106.
    1. Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Van Berkum CM, Eisenberg H, Jane JA, et al. The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9(Suppl 1):S287–92.
    1. Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:573–85. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.573.
    1. Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hebert P. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ. 2002;325:652–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7365.652.
    1. Perner A, Haase N, Guttormsen AB, Tenhunen J, Klemenzson G, Aneman A, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer’s acetate in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:124–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1204242.
    1. Dijkers MP. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: a review of research approaches and findings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:S21–35. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.119.
    1. Bullinger M, Azouvi P, Brooks N, Basso A, Christensen AL, Gobiet W, et al. Quality of life in patients with traumatic brain injury-basic issues, assessment and recommendations. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2002;20:111–24.
    1. Myburgh JA, Cooper DJ, Finfer SR, Venkatesh B, Jones D, Higgins A, et al. Epidemiology and 12-month outcomes from traumatic brain injury in Australia and New Zealand. J Trauma. 2008;64:854–62. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180340e77.
    1. Myburgh J, Cooper DJ, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Norton R, Bishop N, et al. Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:874–84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067514.
    1. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley; 2013.
    1. Roozenbeek B, Lingsma HF, Perel P, Edwards P, Roberts I, Murray GD, et al. The added value of ordinal analysis in clinical trials: an example in traumatic brain injury. Crit Care. 2011;15:R127. doi: 10.1186/cc10240.
    1. Cummings P. Re: converting an adjusted odds ratio to a risk ratio will produce biased estimates. BMJ. 2014; 348:f7450/rr/684808.
    1. Grant RL. Converting an odds ratio to a range of plausible relative risks for better communication of research findings. BMJ. 2014;348:f7450. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7450.
    1. Norton EC, Miller MM, Kleinman LC. Computing adjusted risk ratios and risk differences in Stata. Stata J. 2013;13:492–509.
    1. Jennison C, Turnbull BW. Group sequential methods with applications to clinical trials. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2000.
    1. Cook D, Lauzier F, Rocha MG, Sayles MJ, Finfer S. Serious adverse events in academic critical care research. CMAJ. 2008;178:1181–4. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071366.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться