Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients

Carlos Fernández-del Castillo, Javier Targarona, Sarah P Thayer, David W Rattner, William R Brugge, Andrew L Warshaw, Carlos Fernández-del Castillo, Javier Targarona, Sarah P Thayer, David W Rattner, William R Brugge, Andrew L Warshaw

Abstract

Hypothesis: Widespread use of computed tomography and ultrasound has led to the identification of increasing numbers of patients with asymptomatic cystic lesions of the pancreas.

Design: Retrospective case series of patients with pancreatic cystic lesions.

Setting: University-affiliated tertiary care referral center.

Patients: Two hundred twelve patients with pancreatic cystic lesions seen in our surgical practice during 5 years (April 1997-March 2002).

Main outcome measures: Presence or absence of symptoms, cyst size and location, cytologic or pathologic diagnosis, surgical treatment, and outcome.

Results: Seventy-eight (36.7%) of 212 patients were asymptomatic. Incidental cysts were smaller (3.3 +/- 1.9 vs 4.6 +/- 2.7 cm; P<.001) and were found in older patients (65 +/- 13 vs 56 +/- 15 years; P<.001). Seventy-eight percent of the asymptomatic patients and 87% of those with symptoms underwent surgery, with a single operative death in the entire group (0.5%). Seventeen percent of asymptomatic cysts were serous cystadenomas; 28%, mucinous cystic neoplasms; 27%, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms; and 2.5%, ductal adenocarcinomas. The respective numbers for symptomatic cysts were 7%, 16%, 40%, and 9%. Ten percent of asymptomatic patients had a variety of other cystic lesions, and in 12%, no definitive cytologic or pathologic diagnosis was obtained. Overall, 17% of asymptomatic patients had in situ or invasive cancer, and 42% had a premalignant lesion. When evaluated as a function of size, only 1 (3.5%) of 28 asymptomatic cysts smaller than 2 cm had cancer compared with 13 (26%) of 50 cysts larger than 2 cm (P =.04). The proportion of premalignant lesions, however, remained high in both groups (46% and 38%, respectively). Pseudocysts comprised only 3.8% of asymptomatic cysts compared with 19.4% of symptomatic cysts (P =.003).

Conclusions: Incidental pancreatic cysts are common, occur in older patients, are smaller than symptomatic cysts, and are unlikely to be pseudocysts. More than half of them are either malignant or premalignant lesions and therefore cannot be dismissed.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Computed tomographic (CT) scan of a 24-year-old woman, demonstrating a 4.5-cm septated cyst in the tail of the pancreas. The CT scan was taken for right flank pain related to urolithiasis. She was asymptomatic from a gastrointestinal standpoint. Pathologic testing showed that this was a mucinous cystic neoplasm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Computed tomographic scan of a 72-year-old man, demonstrating cystic dilation of the pancreatic duct. The lesion was initially discovered by ultrasound done for intermittent right upper quadrant abdominal pain: he also had gallstones. The lesion was an intraductal papillary mucinous tumor with carcinoma in situ.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Computed tomographic scan and endoscopic ultrasound of a 53-year-old woman with an incidentally discovered cyst in the tail of the pancreas. Endoscopic ultrasound provided additional morphologic detail, demonstrating septae within the cyst (arrows). It also allowed for the sampling of cyst fluid, which was positive for mucin, and had an elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level. The lesion was resected and found to be a mucinous cystic neoplasm with borderline features.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Algorithm for the management of incidental pancreatic cysts. CEA indicates carcinoembryonic antigen; EUS, endoscopic ultrasound.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться