Financial incentives to promote retention in care and viral suppression in adults with HIV initiating antiretroviral therapy in Tanzania: a three-arm randomised controlled trial

Carolyn A Fahey, Prosper F Njau, Emmanuel Katabaro, Rashid S Mfaume, Nzovu Ulenga, Natalino Mwenda, Patrick T Bradshaw, William H Dow, Nancy S Padian, Nicholas P Jewell, Sandra I McCoy, Carolyn A Fahey, Prosper F Njau, Emmanuel Katabaro, Rashid S Mfaume, Nzovu Ulenga, Natalino Mwenda, Patrick T Bradshaw, William H Dow, Nancy S Padian, Nicholas P Jewell, Sandra I McCoy

Abstract

Background: Financial incentives promote use of HIV services and might support adherence to the sustained antiretroviral therapy (ART) necessary for viral suppression, but few studies have assessed a biomarker of adherence or evaluated optimal implementation. We sought to determine whether varying sized financial incentives for clinic attendance effected viral suppression in patients starting ART in Tanzania.

Methods: In a three-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial at four health facilities in Shinyanga region, Tanzania, adults aged 18 years or older with HIV who had started ART within the past 30 days were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using a tablet-based application (stratified by site) to receive usual care (control group) or to receive a cash incentive for monthly clinic attendance in one of two amounts: 10 000 Tanzanian Shillings (TZS; about US$4·50) or 22 500 TZS (about $10·00). There were no formal exclusion criteria. Participants were masked to the existence of two incentive sizes. Incentives were provided for up to 6 months via mobile health technology (mHealth) that linked biometric attendance monitoring to automated mobile payments. We evaluated the primary outcome of retention in care with viral suppression (<1000 copies per mL) at 6 months using logistic regression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03351556.

Findings: Between April 24 and Dec 14, 2018, 530 participants were randomly assigned to an incentive strategy (184 in the control group, 172 in the smaller incentive group, and 174 in the larger incentive group). All participants were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis. At 6 months, approximately 134 (73%) participants in the control group remained in care and had viral suppression, compared with 143 (83%) in the smaller incentive group (risk difference [RD] 9·8, 95% CI 1·2 to 18·5) and 150 (86%) in the larger incentive group (RD 13·0, 4·5 to 21·5); we identified a positive trend between incentive size and viral suppression (p trend=0·0032), although the incentive groups did not significantly differ (RD 3·2, -4·6 to 11·0). Adverse events included seven (4%) deaths in the control group and 11 (3%) deaths in the intervention groups, none related to study participation.

Interpretation: Small financial incentives delivered using mHealth can improve retention in care and viral suppression in adults starting HIV treatment. Although further research should investigate the durability of effects from short-term incentives, these findings strengthen the evidence for implementing financial incentives within standard HIV care.

Funding: National Institute of Mental Health at the US National Institutes of Health.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1.. Trial profile
Figure 1.. Trial profile
Figure 2.. Retention in care and HIV…
Figure 2.. Retention in care and HIV viral suppression (
Data are predictive marginal probabilities and 95% confidence intervals estimated from logistic regression models adjusted for clinic. *Of those retained in care at 6 months (N=464 out of total sample N=530). †Primary outcome; the composite proportion of patients who remained in care at six months and had a viral load

Figure 3.. Effects of incentives (combined groups)…

Figure 3.. Effects of incentives (combined groups) on viral suppression within subgroups according to baseline…

Figure 3.. Effects of incentives (combined groups) on viral suppression within subgroups according to baseline characteristics.
Data are risk differences with 95% confidence intervals estimated from generalized linear models adjusted for clinic, comparing the combined financial incentive arms to the control arm who received no incentives. P-values for each interaction are shown.
Figure 3.. Effects of incentives (combined groups)…
Figure 3.. Effects of incentives (combined groups) on viral suppression within subgroups according to baseline characteristics.
Data are risk differences with 95% confidence intervals estimated from generalized linear models adjusted for clinic, comparing the combined financial incentive arms to the control arm who received no incentives. P-values for each interaction are shown.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться