Laser-assisted regenerative surgical therapy for peri-implantitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Chin-Wei Wang, Sajjad Ashnagar, Riccardo Di Gianfilippo, Michelle Arnett, Janet Kinney, Hom-Lay Wang, Chin-Wei Wang, Sajjad Ashnagar, Riccardo Di Gianfilippo, Michelle Arnett, Janet Kinney, Hom-Lay Wang

Abstract

Background: Different surgical approaches have been proposed to treat peri-implantitis defects with limited effectiveness and predictability. Laser has been proposed as an effective tool to assist in bacterial decontamination and modulating peri-implant tissue inflammation. The aim of this pilot clinical trial was to evaluate the adjunctive benefits of Er:YAG laser irradiation for regenerative surgical therapy of peri-implantitis-associated osseous defects.

Methods: Twenty-four patients diagnosed with peri-implantitis with a radiographic infrabony defect were randomized into two groups. Both test and control groups received the following treatment: open flap mechanical debridement, supracrestal implantoplasty, bone grafting using a mixture of human allograft with demineralized bone matrix human allograft putty, and then covered with acellular dermal matrix membrane. The only difference in the test group was the adjunctive use of Er:YAG laser to modulate and remove inflammatory tissue as well as to decontaminate the implant surface. Clinical assessments, including pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and gingival index (GI) were performed by calibrated masked examiners for up to 6 months following surgery. Standardized radiographs were also taken to evaluate linear bone gain and defect bone fill. Student t-tests were used to analyze those clinical parameters.

Results: Both groups showed significant reductions in PD, GI, and CAL gain overtime. The test group demonstrated significantly higher PD reductions at the site level compared to the control group (2.65 ± 2.14 versus 1.85 ± 1.71 mm; test versus control, P = 0.014). There were no statistical differences found in CAL gain (1.90 ± 2.28 versus 1.47 ± 1.76 mm; test versus control), GI reduction (-1.14 ± 1.15 versus -1.04 ± 0.89; test versus control), radiographic linear bone gain (1.27 ± 1.14 versus 1.08 ± 1.04 mm; test versus control) or proportional defect size reduction (- 24.46 ± 19.00% versus -15.19 ± 23.56%; test versus control). There was a positive trend for test patients on PD reduction and CAL gain found in narrow infrabony defects. Major membrane exposure negatively impaired the overall treatment outcome of CAL gain (2.47 ± 1.84 versus 1.03 ± 1.48 mm; no/minor versus major exposure, P = 0.051) and PD reduction in the test group (-3.63 ± 2.11 versus -1.66 ± 1.26 mm, P = 0.049).

Conclusion: This pilot study indicated using laser irradiation during peri-implantitis regenerative therapy may aid in better probing PD reduction. Nonetheless, a larger sample size and longer follow-up is needed to confirm if Er:YAG laser irradiation provides additional clinical benefits for peri-implantitis regenerative therapy (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03127228).

Keywords: alveolar bone grafting; bone regeneration; clinical trial; dental implants; lasers; peri-implantitis.

© 2020 American Academy of Periodontology.

References

REFERENCES

    1. Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, Wang HL. Peri-implantitis. J Periodontol. 2018;89 Suppl 1:S267-S290.
    1. Derks J, Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42 Suppl 16:S158-171.
    1. Papathanasiou E, Finkelman M, Hanley J, Parashis AO. Prevalence, etiology and treatment of peri-Implant mucositis and peri-Implantitis: a survey of periodontists in the united states. J Periodontol. 2016;87:493-501.
    1. Renvert S, Widen C, Persson RG. Cytokine and microbial profiles in relation to the clinical outcome following treatment of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:1127-1132.
    1. Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Yu SH, Wang HL. Non-surgical therapy for peri-Implant diseases: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016;7:e13.
    1. Berglundh T, Jepsen S, Stadlinger B, Terheyden H. Peri-implantitis and its prevention. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30:150-155.
    1. Roccuzzo M, Pittoni D, Roccuzzo A, Charrier L, Dalmasso P. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis intrabony lesions by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen: 7-year-results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:1577-1583.
    1. Berglundh T, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Long-term outcome of surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. A 2-11-year Retrospective Study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:404-410.
    1. Faggion CM, Jr., Listl S, Fruhauf N, Chang HJ, Tu YK. A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on non-surgical treatments for peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41:1015-1025.
    1. Chan HL, Lin GH, Suarez F, MacEachern M, Wang HL. Surgical management of peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. J Periodontol. 2014;85:1027-1041.
    1. Tomasi C, Regidor E, Ortiz-Vigon A, Derks J. Efficacy of reconstructive surgical therapy at peri-implantitis-related bone defects. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46 Suppl 21:340-356.
    1. Claffey N, Clarke E, Polyzois I, Renvert S. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:316-332.
    1. Hauser-Gerspach I, Stubinger S, Meyer J. Bactericidal effects of different laser systems on bacteria adhered to dental implant surfaces: an in vitro study comparing zirconia with titanium. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:277-283.
    1. Kreisler M, Kohnen W, Marinello C, et al. Bactericidal effect of the Er:YAG laser on dental implant surfaces: an in vitro study. J Periodontol. 2002;73:1292-1298.
    1. Takagi T, Aoki A, Ichinose S, et al. Effective removal of calcified deposits on microstructured titanium fixture surfaces of dental implants with erbium lasers. J Periodontol. 2018;89:680-690.
    1. Takasaki AA, Aoki A, Mizutani K, Kikuchi S, Oda S, Ishikawa I. Er:YAG laser therapy for peri-implant infection: a Histological Study. Lasers Med Sci. 2007;22:143-157.
    1. Nevins M, Nevins ML, Yamamoto A, et al. Use of Er:YAG laser to decontaminate infected dental implant surface in preparation for reestablishment of bone-to-implant contact. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34:461-466.
    1. Shibli JA. Is laser the best choice for the treatment of peri-implantitis? Photomed Laser Surg. 2018;36:569-570.
    1. Aoki A, Mizutani K, Schwarz F, et al. Periodontal and peri-implant wound healing following laser therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2015;68:217-269.
    1. Gholami L, Asefi S, Hooshyarfard A, et al. Photobiomodulation in periodontology and Implant dentistry: part 1. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019;37:739-765.
    1. Lin GH, Suarez Lopez Del Amo F, Wang HL. Laser therapy for treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: an American Academy of periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol. 2018;89:766-782.
    1. Hurwitz EE, Simon M, Vinta SR, et al. Adding examples to the ASA-physical status classification improves correct assignment to patients. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:614-622.
    1. Loe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol. 1967;38:Suppl:610-616.
    1. Monje A, Pons R, Insua A, Nart J, Wang HL, Schwarz F. Morphology and severity of peri-implantitis bone defects. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21:635-643.
    1. Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45 Suppl 20:S286-S291.
    1. Tosun E, Tasar F, Strauss R, Kivanc DG, Ungor C. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial effects of Er:YAG, diode, and CO(2) lasers on titanium discs: an Experimental Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:1064-1069.
    1. Stubinger S, Henke J, Donath K, Deppe H. Bone regeneration after peri-implant care with the CO2 laser: a fluorescence Microscopy Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:203-210.
    1. Stubinger S, Etter C, Miskiewicz M, et al. Surface alterations of polished and sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants after Er:YAG, carbon dioxide, and diode laser irradiation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:104-111.
    1. Schwarz F, Sahm N, Iglhaut G, Becker J. Impact of the method of surface debridement and decontamination on the clinical outcome following combined surgical therapy of peri-implantitis: a randomized controlled Clinical Study. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:276-284.
    1. Norton MR. Efficacy of Er:YAG laser in the decontamination of peri-implant disease: a one-year prospective closed cohort study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017;37:781-788.
    1. Clem D, Gunsolley JC. Peri-implantitis treatment using Er: YAG laser and bone grafting. a prospective consecutive case series evaluation: 1 year posttherapy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39: 479-489.
    1. Yamamoto A, Tanabe T. Treatment of peri-implantitis around TiUnite-surface implants using Er:YAG laser microexplosions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33:21-30.
    1. Katafuchi M, Weinstein BF, Leroux BG, Chen YW, Daubert DM. Restoration contour is a risk indicator for peri-implantitis: a cross-sectional radiographic analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45:225-232.
    1. Wilson TG, Jr. The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol. 2009;80:1388-1392.
    1. Monje A, Aranda L, Diaz KT, et al. Impact of maintenance therapy for the prevention of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016;95:372-379.
    1. Mercado F, Hamlet S, Ivanovski S. Regenerative surgical therapy for peri-implantitis using deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen, enamel matrix derivative and Doxycycline-A prospective 3-year cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:583-591.
    1. Renvert S, Roos-Jansaker AM, Persson GR. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis lesions with or without the use of a bone substitute-a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45:1266-1274.
    1. Lee D-W, Pi S-H, Lee S-K, Kim E-C. Comparative histomorphometric analysis of extraction sockets healing implanted with bovine xenografts, irradiated cancellous allografts, and solvent-dehydrated allografts in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:609-615.
    1. Jensen SS, Broggini N, Hjørting-Hansen E, Schenk R, Buser D. Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and β-tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs. Clin Oral implants Res. 2006;17:237-243.
    1. Fowler EB, Breault LG, Rebitski G. Ridge preservation utilizing an acellular dermal allograft and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: part II. Immediate endosseous implant placement. J Periodontol. 2000;71:1360-1364.
    1. Park SH, Lee Kw, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Shotwell J, Wang HL. Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation. Clinical Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:32-41.
    1. Klinge B, Meyle J, Working G. Peri-implant tissue destruction. The third EAO Consensus Conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 6:108-110.
    1. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Needleman I, Salvi GE, Pjetursson BE. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for prevention and management of biologic and technical implant complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:346-350.
    1. Garcia J, Dodge A, Luepke P, Wang HL, Kapila Y, Lin GH. Effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:328-338.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться