Randomised controlled trial of high versus ad libitum water intake in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: rationale and design of the DRINK feasibility trial

Ragada El-Damanawi, Michael Lee, Tess Harris, Laura B Mader, Simon Bond, Holly Pavey, Richard N Sandford, Ian B Wilkinson, Alison Burrows, Przemyslaw Woznowski, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Fiona E Karet Frankl, Thomas F Hiemstra, Ragada El-Damanawi, Michael Lee, Tess Harris, Laura B Mader, Simon Bond, Holly Pavey, Richard N Sandford, Ian B Wilkinson, Alison Burrows, Przemyslaw Woznowski, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Fiona E Karet Frankl, Thomas F Hiemstra

Abstract

Introduction: Vasopressin stimulates cyst growth in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) leading to enlarged kidneys, hypertension and renal failure. Vasopressin receptor blockade slows disease progression. Physiological suppression of vasopressin secretion through high water (HW) intake could achieve a similar effect, necessitating a definitive large-scale trial of HW intake in ADPKD. The objective of the DRINK trial is to answer the key design and feasibility questions required to deliver a successful definitive water intake trial.

Methods and analysis: We describe the design of a single-centre, open-label, prospective, randomised controlled trial. The "Determining feasibility of R andomisation to high vs. ad libitum water In take in Polycystic K idney Disease" (DRINK) trial aims to enrol 50 patients with ADPKD, over the age of 16 years with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥20 mL/min/1.73 m2. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to HW intake based on an individualised water intake prescription, or to ad libitum (AW) water intake. The HW group will aim for a dilute urine (urine osmolality ≤270 mOsm/kg) as a surrogate marker of vasopressin suppression, and those in the AW group will target more concentrated urine. Participants will have an 8-week treatment period, and will be seen at weeks 0, 2, 4 and 8, undergoing assessments of fluid status, renal function and serum and urine osmolalities. They will receive dietary advice, and self-monitor urine specific gravity and fluid intake. The trial employs smartphone technology to permit home monitoring and remote direct data capture. The primary feasibility end points are recruitment rate and separation between arms in measured urinary osmolality. Key secondary assessments include acceptability, adherence, health-related quality of life, acute effects of HW intake on measured (51Cr-EDTA) and eGFR and ADPKD-related pain.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was awarded by the East of England Essex Research Ethics Committee (16/EE/0026). The results of DRINK will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals, and presented to patients via the PKD Charity.

Trial registration number: NCT02933268 and ISCRTN16794957.

Keywords: autosomal dominant polcystic kidney disease; feasibility; osmolality; urine specific gravity; vasopressin; water.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of the DRINK trial design. Participants are randomised 1:1 to the high water (HW) or ad libitum (AW) water intake groups. Each participant in the HW group is given an individualised daily water prescription with urinary dilution targets consistent with vasopressin suppression. The AW group has more concentrated urinary targets. ADPKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; uSG, urine specific gravity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Smartphone technology used during the DRINK study. The SPLASH app uses near field communication technology to automate fluid intake monitoring (left). The DRINK app will be used to record urine specific gravity results allowing remote data collection and monitoring of progress (right).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Calculation of fluid prescription using the free water clearance equation. Insensible losses were arbitrarily set at 500 mL as an average.

References

    1. Chapman AB, Devuyst O, Eckardt KU, et al. . Autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): executive summary from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int 2015;88:17–27. 10.1038/ki.2015.59
    1. Gansevoort RT, Arici M, Benzing T, et al. . Recommendations for the use of tolvaptan in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a position statement on behalf of the ERA-EDTA Working Groups on Inherited Kidney Disorders and European Renal Best Practice. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2016;31:337–48. 10.1093/ndt/gfv456
    1. Shaw C, Simms RJ, Pitcher D, et al. . Epidemiology of patients in England and Wales with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and end-stage renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014;29:1910–8. 10.1093/ndt/gfu087
    1. Porath B, Gainullin VG, Cornec-Le Gall E, et al. . Mutations in GANAB, Encoding the Glucosidase IIα Subunit, cause autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney and liver disease. Am J Hum Genet 2016;98:1193–207. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.05.004
    1. Chebib FT, Sussman CR, Wang X, et al. . Vasopressin and disruption of calcium signalling in polycystic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 2015;11:451–64. 10.1038/nrneph.2015.39
    1. Devuyst O, Torres VE. Osmoregulation, vasopressin, and cAMP signaling in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2013;22:459–70. 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3283621510
    1. Torres VE, Chapman AB, Devuyst O, et al. . Tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2407–18. 10.1056/NEJMoa1205511
    1. Torres VE, Chapman AB, Devuyst O, et al. . Tolvaptan in Later-Stage Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med 2017;377 10.1056/NEJMoa1710030
    1. van Gastel MDA, Torres VE. Polycystic kidney disease and the vasopressin pathway. Ann Nutr Metab 2017;70(Suppl 1):43–50. 10.1159/000463063
    1. Nagao S, Nishii K, Katsuyama M, et al. . Increased water intake decreases progression of polycystic kidney disease in the PCK rat. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:2220–7. 10.1681/ASN.2006030251
    1. Hopp K, Wang X, Ye H, et al. . Effects of hydration in rats and mice with polycystic kidney disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2015;308:F261–6. 10.1152/ajprenal.00345.2014
    1. Amro OW, Paulus JK, Noubary F, et al. . Low-osmolar diet and adjusted water intake for vasopressin reduction in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2016;68:882–91. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.07.023
    1. Barash I, Ponda MP, Goldfarb DS, et al. . A pilot clinical study to evaluate changes in urine osmolality and urine cAMP in response to acute and chronic water loading in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5:693–7. 10.2215/CJN.04180609
    1. Higashihara E, Nutahara K, Tanbo M, et al. . Does increased water intake prevent disease progression in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014;29:1710–9. 10.1093/ndt/gfu093
    1. Wong ATY, Mannix C, Grantham JJ, et al. . Randomised controlled trial to determine the efficacy and safety of prescribed water intake to prevent kidney failure due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (PREVENT-ADPKD). BMJ Open 2018;8.
    1. Yu ASL, Shen C, Landsittel DP, et al. . Baseline total kidney volume and the rate of kidney growth are associated with chronic kidney disease progression in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int 2018;93:691–9. 10.1016/j.kint.2017.09.027
    1. Levey AS, Inker LA, Matsushita K, Asl MD, Laim MS, Kmm P, et al. . GFR decline as an end point for clinical trials in CKD: a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and the US Food and Drug Administration. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;64:821–35. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.07.030
    1. Luo X, Woznowski P, Burrows A, et al. . SPLASH. New York, USA: ACM Press, 2016:1526–32.
    1. El-Damanawi R, Harris T, Sandford RN, et al. . Patient survey of current water Intake practices in autosomal dominant Polycystic kidney disease: the SIPs survey. Clin Kidney J 2017;10:305–9. 10.1093/ckj/sfw153
    1. Imran S, Eva G, Christopher S, et al. . Is specific gravity a good estimate of urine osmolality? J Clin Lab Anal 2010;24:426–30. 10.1002/jcla.20424
    1. Chua TX, Prasad NS, Rangan GK, et al. . A systematic review to determine the most effective interventions to increase water intake. Nephrology 2016;21:860-9 10.1111/nep.12675
    1. Levey AS, Greene T, Schluchter MD, et al. . Glomerular filtration rate measurements in clinical trials. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993;4:1159–71.
    1. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. . A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:604–12. 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006
    1. Bolignano D, Cabassi A, Fiaccadori E, et al. . Copeptin (CTproAVP), a new tool for understanding the role of vasopressin in pathophysiology. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2014;52:1–10. 10.1515/cclm-2014-0379
    1. Casteleijn NF, Blais JD, Chapman AB, et al. . Tolvaptan and kidney pain in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2017;69:210–9. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.08.028
    1. Lotan Y, Daudon M, Bruyère F, et al. . Impact of fluid intake in the prevention of urinary system diseases: a brief review. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2013;22(Suppl 1):S1–S10. 10.1097/MNH.0b013e328360a268
    1. Hogan MC, Norby SM. Evaluation and management of pain in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2010;17:e1–e16. 10.1053/j.ackd.2010.01.005
    1. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Trudeau JJ, et al. . Validation of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in acute low back pain. J Pain 2015;16:357–66. 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.01.012
    1. Devuyst O, Chapman AB, Gansevoort RT, et al. . Urine osmolality, response to tolvaptan, and outcome in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: results from the TEMPO 3:4 trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;28:1592–602. 10.1681/ASN.2016040448

Source: PubMed

Подписаться