Exploring venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variability with a phenotyping approach, a multicentric french-swiss study (MARVEL study)

Célia Lloret-Linares, Youssef Daali, Sylvie Chevret, Isabelle Nieto, Fanny Molière, Philippe Courtet, Florence Galtier, Raphaëlle-Marie Richieri, Sophie Morange, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Wissam El-Hage, Thomas Desmidt, Frédéric Haesebaert, Philippe Vignaud, Jerôme Holtzmann, Jean-Luc Cracowski, Marion Leboyer, Antoine Yrondi, Fabienne Calvas, Liova Yon, Philippe Le Corvoisier, Olivier Doumy, Kyle Heron, Damien Montange, Siamak Davani, Julien Déglon, Marie Besson, Jules Desmeules, Emmanuel Haffen, Frank Bellivier, Célia Lloret-Linares, Youssef Daali, Sylvie Chevret, Isabelle Nieto, Fanny Molière, Philippe Courtet, Florence Galtier, Raphaëlle-Marie Richieri, Sophie Morange, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Wissam El-Hage, Thomas Desmidt, Frédéric Haesebaert, Philippe Vignaud, Jerôme Holtzmann, Jean-Luc Cracowski, Marion Leboyer, Antoine Yrondi, Fabienne Calvas, Liova Yon, Philippe Le Corvoisier, Olivier Doumy, Kyle Heron, Damien Montange, Siamak Davani, Julien Déglon, Marie Besson, Jules Desmeules, Emmanuel Haffen, Frank Bellivier

Abstract

Background: It is well known that the standard doses of a given drug may not have equivalent effects in all patients. To date, the management of depression remains mainly empirical and often poorly evaluated. The development of a personalized medicine in psychiatry may reduce treatment failure, intolerance or resistance, and hence the burden and costs of mood depressive disorders. The Geneva Cocktail Phenotypic approach presents several advantages including the "in vivo" measure of different cytochromes and transporter P-gp activities, their simultaneous determination in a single test, avoiding the influence of variability over time on phenotyping results, the administration of low dose substrates, a limited sampling strategy with an analytical method developed on DBS analysis. The goal of this project is to explore the relationship between the activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes (DME), assessed by a phenotypic approach, and the concentrations of Venlafaxine (VLX) + O-demethyl-venlafaxine (ODV), the efficacy and tolerance of VLX.

Methods/design: This study is a multicentre prospective non-randomized open trial. Eligible patients present a major depressive episode, MADRS over or equal to 20, treatment with VLX regardless of the dose during at least 4 weeks. The Phenotype Visit includes VLX and ODV concentration measurement. Following the oral absorption of low doses of omeprazole, midazolam, dextromethorphan, and fexofenadine, drug metabolizing enzymes activity is assessed by specific metabolite/probe concentration ratios from a sample taken 2 h after cocktail administration for CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP2D6; and by the determination of the limited area under the curve from the capillary blood samples taken 2-3 and 6 h after cocktail administration for CYP2C19 and P-gp. Two follow-up visits will take place between 25 and 40 days and 50-70 days after inclusion. They include assessment of efficacy, tolerance and observance. Eleven french centres are involved in recruitment, expected to be completed within approximately 2 years with 205 patients. Metabolic ratios are determined in Geneva, Switzerland.

Discussion: By showing an association between drug metabolism and VLX concentrations, efficacy and tolerance, there is a hope that testing drug metabolism pathways with a phenotypical approach would help physicians in selecting and dosing antidepressants. The MARVEL study will provide an important contribution to increasing the knowledge of VLX variability and in optimizing the use of methods of personalized therapy in psychiatric settings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02590185 (10/27/2015). This study is currently recruiting participants.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained by an Independent Ethics Committee (CPP Ile de France I, Paris) and by the Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Produits de Santé (ANSM, French Health Products Safety Agency). The study was registered at the All subjects give their written informed consent for the study and for the use of its individual publication for analysis and publication.

Consent for publication

All subjects give their written informed consent for the study and for the use of its individual publication for analysis and publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. J Déglon is founder of the DBS System Company.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Venlafaxine metabolism
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of MARVEL design. V (Venlafaxine), ODV (O-demethyl-Venlafaxine). MADRS (Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale); HAM-D (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression). V0 (Inclusion Visit), V1 (Phenotypic visit)

References

    1. Global Burden of Disease Study C Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2015;9995(386):743–800.
    1. Sobocki P, Jonsson B, Angst J, Rehnberg C. Cost of depression in Europe. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2006;2(9):87–98.
    1. Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Jacobi F, et al. Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;10(21):718–779. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.08.008.
    1. Souery D, Oswald P, Massat I, et al. Clinical factors associated with treatment resistance in major depressive disorder: results from a European multicenter study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;7(68):1062–1070. doi: 10.4088/JCP.v68n0713.
    1. Souery D, Amsterdam J, de Montigny C, et al. Treatment resistant depression: methodological overview and operational criteria. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1999;1-2(9):83–91. doi: 10.1016/S0924-977X(98)00004-2.
    1. Kocsis JH. New strategies for treating chronic depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2000 61 Suppl 11):42–5.
    1. Crown WH, Finkelstein S, Berndt ER, et al. The impact of treatment-resistant depression on health care utilization and costs. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;11(63):963–971. doi: 10.4088/JCP.v63n1102.
    1. Lloret-Linares C, Bellivier F, Haffen E, et al. Markers of individual drug metabolism: towards the development of a personalized antidepressant prescription. Curr Drug Metab. 2015;1(16):17–45. doi: 10.2174/138920021601150702160728.
    1. Hall-Flavin DK, Winner JG, Allen JD, et al. Using a pharmacogenomic algorithm to guide the treatment of depression. Transl Psychiatry. 20122:e172.
    1. Altar CA, Carhart J, Allen JD, Hall-Flavin D, Winner J, Dechairo B. Clinical utility of combinatorial pharmacogenomics-guided antidepressant therapy: evidence from three clinical studies. Mol Neuropsychiatry. 2015;3(1):145–155. doi: 10.1159/000430915.
    1. Winner J, Allen JD, Altar CA, Spahic-Mihajlovic A. Psychiatric pharmacogenomics predicts health resource utilization of outpatients with anxiety and depression. Transl Psychiatry. 20133:e242.
    1. Winner JG, Carhart JM, Altar CA, et al. Combinatorial pharmacogenomic guidance for psychiatric medications reduces overall pharmacy costs in a 1 year prospective evaluation. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;9(31):1633–1643. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1063483.
    1. McGraw J, Waller D. Cytochrome P450 variations in different ethnic populations. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2012;3(8):371–382. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2012.657626.
    1. Zhou H, Tong Z, McLeod JF. "Cocktail" approaches and strategies in drug development: valuable tool or flawed science? J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;2(44):120–134. doi: 10.1177/0091270003261333.
    1. Fuhr U, Jetter A, Kirchheiner J. Appropriate phenotyping procedures for drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters in humans and their simultaneous use in the "cocktail" approach. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;2(81):270–283. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100050.
    1. Floyd MD, Gervasini G, Masica AL, et al. Genotype-phenotype associations for common CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 variants in the basal and induced metabolism of midazolam in European- and African-American men and women. Pharmacogenetics. 2003;10(13):595–606. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200310000-00003.
    1. Rebsamen MC, Desmeules J, Daali Y, et al. The AmpliChip CYP450 test: cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype assessment and phenotype prediction. Pharmacogenomics J. 2009;1(9):34–41. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2008.7.
    1. Heller T, Kirchheiner J, Armstrong VW, et al. AmpliChip CYP450 GeneChip: a new gene chip that allows rapid and accurate CYP2D6 genotyping. Ther Drug Monit. 2006;5(28):673–677. doi: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000246764.67129.2a.
    1. de Leon J, Armstrong SC, Cozza KL. Clinical guidelines for psychiatrists for the use of pharmacogenetic testing for CYP450 2D6 and CYP450 2C19. Psychosomatics. 2006;1(47):75–85. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.47.1.75.
    1. Miller DB, O'Callaghan JP. Personalized medicine in major depressive disorder -- opportunities and pitfalls. Metabolism: clinical and experimental 2013 62 Suppl 1):S34–9.
    1. Samer CF, Lorenzini KI, Rollason V, Daali Y, Desmeules JA. Applications of CYP450 testing in the clinical setting. Mol Diagn Ther. 2013;17(3):165–84. doi: 10.1007/s40291-013-0028-5.
    1. Steiner E, Bertilsson L, Sawe J, Bertling I, Sjoqvist F. Polymorphic debrisoquin hydroxylation in 757 Swedish subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988;4(44):431–435. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1988.176.
    1. Sachse C, Brockmoller J, Bauer S, Roots I. Cytochrome P450 2D6 variants in a Caucasian population: allele frequencies and phenotypic consequences. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;2(60):284–295.
    1. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Bupropion-SR, sertraline, or venlafaxine-XR after failure of SSRIs for depression. N Engl J Med. 2006;12(354):1231–1242. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052963.
    1. Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;9665(373):746–758. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60046-5.
    1. Wellington K, Perry CM. Venlafaxine extended-release: a review of its use in the management of major depression. CNS drugs. 2001;8(15):643–669. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200115080-00007.
    1. Hiemke C, Baumann P, Bergemann N, et al. AGNP consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry: update 2011. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2011;6(44):195–235.
    1. Sangkuhl K, Stingl JC, Turpeinen M, Altman RB, Klein TE. PharmGKB summary: venlafaxine pathway. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2014;1(24):62–72. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000003.
    1. Fogelman SM, Schmider J, Venkatakrishnan K, et al. O- and N-demethylation of venlafaxine in vitro by human liver microsomes and by microsomes from cDNA-transfected cells: effect of metabolic inhibitors and SSRI antidepressants. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999;5(20):480–490. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(98)00113-4.
    1. Veefkind AH, Haffmans PM, Hoencamp E. Venlafaxine serum levels and CYP2D6 genotype. Ther Drug Monit. 2000;2(22):202–208. doi: 10.1097/00007691-200004000-00011.
    1. Klamerus KJ, Maloney K, Rudolph RL, Sisenwine SF, Jusko WJ, Chiang ST. Introduction of a composite parameter to the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine and its active O-desmethyl metabolite. J Clin Pharmacol. 1992;8(32):716–724. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1992.tb03875.x.
    1. Shams ME, Arneth B, Hiemke C, et al. CYP2D6 polymorphism and clinical effect of the antidepressant venlafaxine. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2006;5(31):493–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2006.00763.x.
    1. Hermann M, Hendset M, Fosaas K, Hjerpset M, Refsum H. Serum concentrations of venlafaxine and its metabolites O-desmethylvenlafaxine and N-desmethylvenlafaxine in heterozygous carriers of the CYP2D6*3, *4 or *5 allele. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;5(64):483–487. doi: 10.1007/s00228-007-0453-7.
    1. Ball SE, Ahern D, Scatina J, Kao J. Venlafaxine: in vitro inhibition of CYP2D6 dependent imipramine and desipramine metabolism; comparative studies with selected SSRIs, and effects on human hepatic CYP3A4, CYP2C9 and CYP1A2. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;6(43):619–626. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1997.00591.x.
    1. Jornil J, Nielsen TS, Rosendal I, et al. A poor metabolizer of both CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 identified by mechanistic pharmacokinetic simulation in a fatal drug poisoning case involving venlafaxine. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;1-3(226):e26–e31. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.12.020.
    1. McAlpine DE, Biernacka JM, Mrazek DA, et al. Effect of cytochrome P450 enzyme polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine. Ther Drug Monit. 2011;1(33):14–20. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181fcf94d.
    1. Leuthold LA, Heudi O, Deglon J, et al. New microfluidic-based sampling procedure for overcoming the hematocrit problem associated with dried blood spot analysis. Anal Chem. 2015;4(87):2068–2071. doi: 10.1021/ac503931g.
    1. Williams JB, Kobak KA. Development and reliability of a structured interview guide for the Montgomery Asberg depression rating scale (SIGMA) Br J Psychiatry. 2008;1(192):52–58. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.032532.
    1. Hawley CJ, Gale TM, Sivakumaran T. Hertfordshire neuroscience research g. Defining remission by cut off score on the MADRS: selecting the optimal value. J Affect Disord. 2002;2(72):177–184. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00451-7.
    1. Thompson K, Kulkarni J, Sergejew AA. Reliability and validity of a new medication adherence rating scale (MARS) for the psychoses. Schizophr Res. 2000;3(42):241–247. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(99)00130-9.
    1. Lesur A, Bonnet D, Vicaut E, Lemperiere T. Tyrer's brief scale for anxiety used with outpatients. First validation in the French language. Encéphale. 1989;6(15):535–542.
    1. Uher R, Farmer A, Henigsberg N, et al. Adverse reactions to antidepressants. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;3(195):202–210. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.061960.
    1. Bryan C, Songer T, Brooks MM, et al. The impact of diabetes on depression treatment outcomes. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;1(32):33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.07.009.
    1. Bosilkovska M, Deglon J, Samer C, et al. Simultaneous LC-MS/MS quantification of P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 probe substrates and their metabolites in DBS and plasma. Bioanalysis. 2014;2(6):151–164. doi: 10.4155/bio.13.289.
    1. Bosilkovska M, Samer CF, Deglon J, et al. Geneva cocktail for cytochrome P450 and P-glycoprotein activity assessment using dried blood spots. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2014.
    1. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;1(163):28–40. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28.
    1. Schweitzer I, Burrows G, Tuckwell V, et al. Sustained response to open-label venlafaxine in drug-resistant major depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001;2(21):185–189. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200104000-00010.
    1. Anderson IM, Ferrier IN, Baldwin RC, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: a revision of the 2000 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines. J Psychopharmacol. 2008;4(22):343–396. doi: 10.1177/0269881107088441.
    1. Rubin. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley online library. 1987.
    1. Little R. Statistical analysis with missing data, 2nd edition. Wiley 2002.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться