Improved glycaemic control and weight benefit with iGlarLixi versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes advancing their therapy from basal insulin plus oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: Results from the LixiLan-L-CN randomized controlled trial

Xiaoyong Yuan, Xiaohui Guo, Junqing Zhang, Xiaolin Dong, Yibing Lu, Wuyan Pang, Shenghong Gu, Elisabeth Niemoeller, Lin Ping, Gaowei Nian, Elisabeth Souhami, LixiLan-L-CN investigators, Xiaoyong Yuan, Xiaohui Guo, Junqing Zhang, Xiaolin Dong, Yibing Lu, Wuyan Pang, Shenghong Gu, Elisabeth Niemoeller, Lin Ping, Gaowei Nian, Elisabeth Souhami, LixiLan-L-CN investigators

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi compared with iGlar in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes advancing therapy from basal insulin ± oral antihyperglycaemic drugs.

Materials and methods: LixiLan-L-CN (NCT03798080) was a 30-week randomized, active-controlled, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study. Participants were randomized 1:1 to iGlarLixi or iGlar. The primary objective was to show the superiority of iGlarLixi over iGlar in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change from baseline to Week 30.

Results: In total, 426 participants were randomized to iGlarLixi (n = 212) or iGlar (n = 214). Mean age was 58 years, 67% had a body mass index ≥24 kg/m2 , corresponding to overweight/obesity, and the mean diabetes duration was 12.3 years. From mean baseline HbA1c of 8.1% in both groups, greater decreases were seen with iGlarLixi versus iGlar [least squares mean difference: -0.7 (95% confidence interval: -0.9, -0.6)%; p < .0001] to final HbA1c of 6.7% and 7.4%, respectively. HbA1c <7.0% achievement was greater with iGlarLixi (63.3%) versus iGlar (29.9%; p < .0001). Mean body weight decreased with iGlarLixi and increased with iGlar [least squares mean difference: -0.9 (95% confidence interval: -1.4, -0.5) kg; p = .0001]. Hypoglycaemia incidence was similar between groups. Few gastrointestinal adverse events occurred (rated mild/moderate) with a slightly higher incidence with iGlarLixi than iGlar.

Conclusions: iGlarLixi provided better glycaemic control and facilitated more participants to reach glycaemic targets alongside beneficial effects on body weight, no additional risk of hypoglycaemia, and few gastrointestinal AEs, supporting iGlarLixi use as an efficacious and well tolerated therapy option in Chinese people with long-standing T2D advancing therapy from basal insulin.

Keywords: GLP-1 analogue; basal insulin; clinical trial; glycaemic control; iGlarLixi; type 2 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

XY, XG, JZ, XD, YL and WP declare that they have no competing interests; SG, LP, GN, EN and ES are employees of Sanofi and may hold shares and/or stock options in the company.

© 2022 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Response to therapy (mITT population). A, Mean HbA1c over time; B, change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 30; C, HbA1c target achievement and composite target achievement; D, pre‐ and postprandial plasma glucose; E, 7‐point SMPG profiles at baseline and Week 30 for iGlar; F, 7‐point SMPG profiles at baseline and Week 30 for iGlarLixi; G, change in body weight over time; and H, total insulin dose over time (mITT population). *p < .0001; †−15 ± 1 mmol/mol; ‡−8 ± 1 mmol/mol; §−8 (−10, −7) mmol/mol; ¶<53 mmol/mol; ǁat Week 30; #during the 30‐week randomized treatment period; ††exploratory endpoint, not included in the hierarchical testing procedure; ‡‡<48 mmol/mol; §§p‐value for descriptive purposes only, endpoint not included in the hierarchical testing procedure. BL, baseline; CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; iGlar, insulin glargine 100 U/mL; iGlarLixi, a fixed‐ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide; LOCF, last observation carried forward; LS, least squares; P‐BL, prior to baseline; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error; SMPG, self‐monitored plasma glucose; U, units; W, week
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Incidence and event rates of hypoglycaemia during the 30‐week randomized treatment period (safety population). iGlar, insulin glargine 100 U/mL; iGlarLixi, a fixed‐ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide; PY, participant‐years; PPY, per participant‐year

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation . IDF Diabetes Atlas – Tenth Edition. 2021; . Accessed December 15, 2021.
    1. Ji L, Zhang P, Zhu D, et al. Observational registry of basal insulin treatment (ORBIT) in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: real‐life use of basal insulin in China. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(6):822‐830.
    1. Chinese Diabetes Society . Guideline for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in China (2020 edition). Chin J Diabetes Mellitus. 2020;13(4):315‐409.
    1. Rosenstock J, Aronson R, Grunberger G, et al. Benefits of LixiLan, a titratable fixed‐ratio combination of insulin glargine plus lixisenatide, versus insulin glargine and lixisenatide monocomponents in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral agents: the LixiLan‐O randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):2026‐2035.
    1. Watada H, Takami A, Spranger R, Amano A, Hashimoto Y, Niemoeller E. Efficacy and safety of 1:1 fixed‐ratio combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide versus lixisenatide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs: the LixiLan JP‐O1 randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:1249‐1257.
    1. Terauchi Y, Nakama T, Spranger R, Amano A, Inoue T, Niemoeller E. Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination (iGlarLixi 1:1) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs: a randomized, 26‐week, open‐label, multicentre study: the LixiLan JP‐O2 randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(S4):14‐23.
    1. Aroda VR, Rosenstock J, Wysham C, et al. Efficacy and safety of LixiLan, a titratable fixed‐ratio combination of insulin glargine plus lixisenatide in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin and metformin: the LixiLan‐L randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1972‐1980.
    1. Kaneto H, Takami A, Spranger R, Amano A, Watanabe D, Niemoeller E. Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination (iGlarLixi) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs: the LixiLan JP‐L randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(Suppl 4):3‐13.
    1. Blonde L, Anderson JE, Chava P, Dendy JA. Rationale for a titratable fixed‐ratio co‐formulation of a basal insulin analog and a glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonist in patients with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(5):793‐804.
    1. Kodama K, Tojjar D, Yamada S, Toda K, Patel CJ, Butte AJ. Ethnic differences in the relationship between insulin sensitivity and insulin response: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(6):1789‐1796.
    1. Zhang XM, Li PF, Hou JN, Ji LN. Blood glucose profiles in east Asian and Caucasian injection‐naive patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral medication: a pooled analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2018;34(8):e3062.
    1. Cho YM. Characteristics of the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes in Asians. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2017;2(2):14.
    1. Gao L, Zhang P, Weng J, et al. Patient characteristics and 6‐month dose of basal insulin associated with HbA1c achievement <7.0% in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes: results from the observational registry of basal insulin treatment (ORBIT). J Diabetes. 2020;12(9):668‐676.
    1. Ji L, Kang ES, Dong X, et al. Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus insulin glargine 100 U/ml in Asia Pacific insulin‐naïve people with type 2 diabetes: the EDITION AP randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(4):612‐621.
    1. Yang W, Dong X, Li Q, et al. Efficacy and safety benefits of iGlarLixi versus insulin glargine 100 U/ml or lixisenatide in Asian Pacific people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes on oral agents: the LixiLan‐O‐AP randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022;24:1522–1533.
    1. Ji L, Min KW, Oliveira J, Lew T, Duan R. Comparison of efficacy and safety of two starting insulin regimens in non‐Asian, Asian Indian, and east Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of the PARADIGM study. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2016;9:243‐249.
    1. Agency EM. Guidance on the management of clinical trials during the COVID‐19 (coronavirus) pandemic. 2021; . Accessed January 28, 2022.
    1. Food and Drug Administration . Conduct of clinical trials of medical products during the COVID‐19 public health emergency: Guidance for instudry, investigators and institutional review boards. 2021; . Accessed September 23, 2021, 2021.
    1. Evaluation CFD . Drug Clinical Trial Management during the COVID‐19 Outbreak – Guiding Principles . 2020.
    1. Association. AD . Chapter 6. Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Supplement 1):S73‐S84.
    1. Jia W, Weng J, Zhu D, et al. Standards of medical care for type 2 diabetes in China 2019. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019;35(6):e3158.
    1. Chan JCN, Bunnag P, Chan SP, et al. Glycaemic responses in Asian and non‐Asian people with type 2 diabetes initiating insulin glargine 100 units/ml: a patient‐level pooled analysis of 16 randomised controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;135:199‐205.
    1. Agency EM . Suliqua public assessment report. 2016; . Accessed March 10, 2022.
    1. Owens DR, Landgraf W, Frier BM, et al. Commencing insulin glargine 100 U/ml therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes: determinants of achievement of HbA1c goal less than 7.0. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(2):321‐329.
    1. Ji L, Bi Y, Ye S, et al. Comparison of insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml on glycemic control and hypoglycemic events in east Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: a patient‐level meta‐analysis of phase 3 studies. Diabetes Res Clini Pract. 2021;176:108848.
    1. Yki‐Järvinen H, Bergenstal R, Ziemen M, et al. New insulin glargine 300 units/ml versus glargine 100 units/ml in people with type 2 diabetes using oral agents and basal insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6‐month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 2). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(12):3235‐3243.
    1. Terauchi Y, Koyama M, Cheng X, et al. New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 2). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(4):366‐374.
    1. Pei Y, Agner BR, Luo B, et al. DUAL II China: superior HbA1c reductions and weight loss with insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus insulin degludec in a randomized trial of Chinese people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(12):2687‐2696.
    1. Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(12):1090‐1101.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться