Relational interventions in psychotherapy: development of a therapy process rating scale

Randi Ulberg, Elisabeth Ness, Hanne-Sofie Johnsen Dahl, Per Andreas Høglend, Kenneth Critchfield, Phelix Blayvas, Svein Amlo, Randi Ulberg, Elisabeth Ness, Hanne-Sofie Johnsen Dahl, Per Andreas Høglend, Kenneth Critchfield, Phelix Blayvas, Svein Amlo

Abstract

Background: In psychodynamic psychotherapy, one of the therapists' techniques is to intervene on and encourage exploration of the patients' relationships with other people. The impact of these interventions and the response from the patient are probably dependent on certain characteristics of the context in which the interventions are given and the interventions themselves. To identify and analyze in-session effects of therapists' techniques, process scales are used. The aim of the present study was to develop a simple, not resource consuming rating tool for in-session process to be used when therapists' interventions focus on the patients' relationships outside therapy.

Methods: The present study describes the development and use of a therapy process rating scale, the Relational Work Scale (RWS). The scale was constructed to identify, categorize and explore therapist interventions that focus on the patient's relationships to family, friends, and colleges Relational Interventions and explore the impact on the in-session process. RWS was developed with sub scales rating timing, content, and valence of the relational interventions, as well as response from the patient. For the inter-rater reliability analyzes, transcribed segments (10 min) from 20 different patients were scored with RWS by two independent raters. Two clinical vignettes of relational work are included in the paper as examples of how to rate transcripts from therapy sessions with RWS.

Results: The inter-rater agreement on the RWS items was good to excellent.

Conclusion: Relational Work Scale might be a potentially useful tool to identify relational interventions as well as explore the interaction of timing, category, and valence of relational work in psychotherapies. The therapist's interventions on the patient's relationships with people outside therapy and the following patient-therapist interaction might be explored.

Trial registration: First Experimental Study of Transference-interpretations (FEST307/95) REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00423462 .

Keywords: In-session process; Psychodynamic; Relational interventions; Transference.

References

    1. Wykes T, Haro JM, Belli SR, Obradors-Tarrago C, Arango C, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Bitter I, Brunn M, Chevreul K, Demotes-Mainard J, et al. Mental health research priorities for Europe. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2:1036–1042. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00332-6.
    1. Cuijpers P, Berking M, Andersson G, Quigley L, Kleiboer A, Dobson KS. A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments. Can J Psychiatry. 2013;58(7):376–385.
    1. Driessen E, Hollon SD, Bockting CL, Cuijpers P, Turner EH. Does publication bias inflate the apparent efficacy of psychological treatment for major depressive disorder? a systematic review and meta-analysis of US National Institutes of Health-Funded Trials. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137864.
    1. Kazdin AE. Understanding how and why psychotherapy leads to change. Psychother Res. 2009;19(4–5):418–428. doi: 10.1080/10503300802448899.
    1. Crits-Christoph P, Connolly Gibbons MB, Mukherjee D. Psychotherapy process-outcome research. In: Lambert MJ, editor. Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 6. NJ: Wiley: Hoboken; 2013. pp. 298–340.
    1. Orlinsky DE, Rønnestad MH, Willutzki U. Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcome research: continuity and change. In: Lambert M, editor. Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 5. NJ: Wiley: Hoboken; 2004. pp. 307–389.
    1. Levy K, Scala J. Transference, transference interpretations, and transference-focused psychotherapies. Psychother Theory Res Pract. 2012;49:391–403. doi: 10.1037/a0029371.
    1. Malan D. The frontier of brief psychotherapy. New York: Plenum Press; 1976.
    1. Høglend P. Exploration of the patient-therapist relationship in psychotherapy. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(10):1056–1066. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14010121.
    1. Høglend P, Bøgwald K, Amlo S, Marble A, Ulberg R, Sjaastad M, Sørbye O, Heyerdahl O, Johansson P. Transference interpretations in dynamic psychotherapy: do they really yield sustained effects? Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:763–771. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07061028.
    1. Ulberg R, Høglend P, Marble A, Johansson P. Women respond more favorably to transference intervention than men: a randomized study of long-term effects. J Nerv Ment. 2012;200:223–229. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318247cb6d.
    1. Gabbard G, Westen D. Rethinking therapeutic action. Int J Psychoanal. 2003;84:823–841. doi: 10.1516/N4T0-4D5G-NNPL-H7NL.
    1. Samberg E, Marcus E. Process, Resistance, and Interpretation. Textbook of Psychoanalysis. 2005. p. 229–237.
    1. Town J, Diener M, Abbass A, Leichsenring F, Driessen E, Rabung S. A meta-analysis of psychodynamic psychotherapy outcomes: evaluating the effects of research-specific procedures. Psychotbherapy. 2012;49:276–290. doi: 10.1037/a0029564.
    1. Ulberg R, Amlo S, Høglend P. Manual for transference work scale; a micro-analytical tool for therapy process analyses. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0291-y.
    1. Ulberg R, Amlo S, Høglend P. Transference interventions and the process between therapist and patient. Psychotherapy. 2014;51:258–269. doi: 10.1037/a0034708.
    1. Høglend P, Amlo S, Marble A, Bøgwald K-P, Sørbye O, Sjaastad M, Heyerdahl O. Analysis of the patient-therapist relationship in dynamic psychotherapy: an experimental study of transference interpretations. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1739–1746. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.10.1739.
    1. Høglend P. Dynamisk korttidsterapi (brief dynamic psychotherapy) In: Alnes R, Ekern P, Jarval P, editors. Poliklinikken psykiatrisk klinikk 25 år. Oslo: Psykiatrisk klinikk Vinderen; 1990. pp. 27–38.
    1. Bøgwald K-P, Høglend P, Sørbye O. Measurement of transference interpretations. J Psychother Prac Res. 1999;8:264–273.
    1. Høglend P. Manual for process ratings of general skill, supportive interventions and specific techniques. Unpublished manual: Oslo. Norway: Department of Psychiatry, University of Oslo; 1994.
    1. Høglend P, Bøgwald KP, Amlo S, Heyerdahl O, Sørbye O, Marble A, Sjaastad MC, Bentsen H. Assessment of change in dynamic psychotherapy. J Psychother Pract Res. 2000;9(4):190–199.
    1. Alden L, Wiggins J, Pincus A. Construction of circumplex scales for the inventory of interpersonal problems. J Pers Assess. 1990;55:521–536. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5503&4_10.
    1. Derogatis L. SCL-90-R: administration, scoring and procedure manual. Towson: Clinical Psychometric Research; 1983.
    1. Sifneos PE. Short-term anxiety-provoking psychotherapy: a treatment manual. New York: Plenum Press; 1992.
    1. Piper WE, Duncan SC. Object relations theory and short-term dynamic psychotherapy: findings from the quality of object relations scale. Clin Psychol Rev. 1999;19(6):669–685. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00080-4.
    1. Høglend P, Dahl H, Hersoug A, Lorentzen S, Perry J. Long-term effects of transference interpretation in dynamic psychotherapy of personality disorders. Eur Psychiatry. 2011;26:419–424. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.05.006.
    1. Strachey J. The nature of the therapeutic action of psycho-analysis. J Psychother Pract Res 1934. 1999;8:66–82.
    1. Greenson R. The technique and practice of psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press Inc; 1975. pp. 372–373.
    1. Ulberg R, Marble A, Høglend P. Do gender and level of relational functioning influence the long-term treatment response in dynamic psychotherapy? Nordic J Psychiatry. 2009;63:412–419. doi: 10.1080/08039480903009126.
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310.
    1. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420.
    1. Høglend P, Hersoug A, Bøgwald K, Amlo S, Marble A, Sørbye O, Røssberg J, Ulberg R, Gabbard G, Crits-Christoph P. Effects of transference work in the context of therapeutic alliance and quality of object relations. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011;79:697–706. doi: 10.1037/a0024863.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться