Protecting my injured child: a qualitative study of parents' experience of caring for a child with a displaced distal radius fracture

E E Phelps, E Tutton, M L Costa, J Achten, A Moscrop, D C Perry, E E Phelps, E Tutton, M L Costa, J Achten, A Moscrop, D C Perry

Abstract

Background: Childhood fractures can have a significant impact on the daily lives of families affecting children's normal activities and parent's work. Wrist fractures are the most common childhood fracture. The more serious wrist fractures, that can look visibly bent, are often treated with surgery to realign the bones; but this may not be necessary as bent bones straighten in growing children. The children's radius acute fracture fixation trial (CRAFFT) is a multicentre randomised trial of surgery versus a cast without surgery for displaced wrist fractures. Little is known about how families experience these wrist fractures and how they manage treatment uncertainty. This study aimed to understand families' experience of this injury and what it is like to be asked to include their child in a clinical trial.

Methods: Nineteen families (13 mothers, 7 fathers, 2 children) from across the UK participated in telephone interviews. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Our findings highlight parents' desire to be a good parent through the overarching theme "protecting my injured child". To protect their child after injury, parents endeavoured to make the right decisions about treatment and provide comfort to their child but they experienced ongoing worry about their child's recovery. Our findings show that parents felt responsible for the decision about their child's treatment and their child's recovery. They also reveal the extent to which parents worried about the look of their child's wrist and their need for reassurance that the wrist was healing.

Conclusion: Our findings show that protecting their child after injury can be challenging for parents who need support to make decisions about treatment and confidently facilitate their child's recovery. They also highlight the importance of providing information about treatments, acknowledging parents' concerns and their desire to do the right thing for their child, reassuring parents that their child's wrist will heal and ensuring parents understand what to expect as their child recovers.

Keywords: Childhood fractures; Decision-making; Interviews; Qualitative research; Randomised controlled trial.

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors declare a grant from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme for the CRAFFT study, which is related to this work. M. L. Costa also reports that University of Oxford received research grant funding from NIHR, EU, RCS England, and industry, which is unrelated.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Protecting my injured child - themes and categories

References

    1. Cooper C, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG, Bishop N, van Staa TP. Epidemiology of childhood fractures in Britain: a study using the general practice research database. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19(12):1976–1981. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.040902.
    1. Golden-Plotnik S, Ali S, Moir M, Drendel AL, Poonai N, van Manen M. Parental perspectives on Children's functional experiences after limb fracture: a qualitative study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022;38(2):e947-52.
    1. NDORMS. Children's Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial. A multi-centre prospective randomised non-inferiority trial of surgical reduction versus non-surgical casting for displaced distal radius fractures in children. 2020 [updated 2020; cited 2021 December 16]. Available from: .
    1. Papiez K, Tutton E, Phelps EE, Baird J, Costa ML, Achten J, et al. A qualitative study of parents' and their child's experience of a medial epicondyle fracture. Bone Jt Open. 2021;2(6):359–364. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.26.BJO-2020-0186.R1.
    1. Sherratt FC, Beasant L, Crawley EM, Hall NJ, Young B. Enhancing communication, informed consent and recruitment in a paediatric urgent care surgical trial: a qualitative study. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02040-w.
    1. Feudtner C, Schall T, Hill D. Parental personal sense of duty as a Foundation of Pediatric Medical Decision-making. Pediatrics. 2018;142(Suppl 3):S133–SS41. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0516C.
    1. Jenks C, editor. The postmodern child. London: Falmer Press; 1996.
    1. Heidegger M. Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 1962.
    1. Van Manen M. Researching lived experience, human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1990.
    1. Keene DJ, Mistry D, Nam J, Tutton E, Handley R, Morgan L, et al. The ankle injury management (AIM) trial: a pragmatic, multicentre, equivalence randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation comparing close contact casting with open surgical reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of unstable ankle fractures in patients aged over 60 years. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(75):1–158. doi: 10.3310/hta20750.
    1. Rees S, Tutton E, Achten J, Bruce J, Costa ML. Patient experience of long-term recovery after open fracture of the lower limb: a qualitative study using interviews in a community setting. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e031261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031261.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield NT, G. Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. 2019.
    1. Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic enquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1985.
    1. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Sarr B, Fagerlin A, Ubel PA. A matter of perspective: choosing for others differs from choosing for yourself in making treatment decisions. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(6):618–622. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00410.x.
    1. Stevens PE, Pletsch PK. Ethical issues of informed consent: mothers' experiences enrolling their children in bone marrow transplantation research. Cancer Nurs. 2002;25(2):81–87. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200204000-00001.
    1. Snowdon C, Garcia J, Elbourne D. Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45(9):1337–1355. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00063-4.
    1. Davies L, Beard D, Cook JA, Price A, Osbeck I, Toye F. The challenge of equipoise in trials with a surgical and non-surgical comparison: a qualitative synthesis using meta-ethnography. Trials. 2021;22(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05403-5.
    1. Phelps EE, Tutton E, Griffin X, Baird J. A mixed-methods systematic review of patients' experience of being invited to participate in surgical randomised controlled trials. Soc Sci Med. 2020;253:112961. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112961.
    1. Thornton M, Harcourt D, Deave T, Kiff J, Williamson H. “Have we done enough?” a cross-condition exploration of the experiences of parents caring for a child with an appearance-affecting condition or injury. Dev Neurorehabil. 2021;24(6):418–428. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2021.1901150.
    1. Nelson PA, Carees AL, Glenny AM, Kirk SA. Doing the "right" thing': how parents experience and manage decision-making for children's 'Normalising' surgeries. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(5):796–804. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.024.
    1. Peeler A, Fulbrook P, Edward K, Kinnear F. Parents’ experiences of care in a paediatric emergency department: A phenomenological inquiry. Australas Emerg Care. 2019;22:113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2018.12.004.
    1. Chen S, Yao N, Qian M. The influence of uncertainty and intolerance of uncertainty on anxiety. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018;61:60–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.06.005.
    1. Gabriel MG, Wakefield CE, Vetsch J, Karpelowsky JS, Darlington AE, Grant DM, et al. The psychosocial experiences and needs of children undergoing surgery and their parents: a systematic review. J Pediatr Health Care. 2018;32(2):133–149. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2017.08.003.
    1. Hanson A, Drendel AL. A qualitative study of the at-home pain experience for children with an arm fracture. Paediatr Child Health. 2017;22(4):207–210. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxx068.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться