Rationale and design of the preserved versus reduced ejection fraction biomarker registry and precision medicine database for ambulatory patients with heart failure (PREFER-HF) study

Andrew Abboud, Austin Nguonly, Asher Bean, Kemar J Brown, Roy F Chen, David Dudzinski, Neyat Fiseha, Melvin Joice, Davis Kimaiyo, Mackenzie Martin, Christy Taylor, Kevin Wei, Megan Welch, Daniel A Zlotoff, James L Januzzi, Hanna K Gaggin, Andrew Abboud, Austin Nguonly, Asher Bean, Kemar J Brown, Roy F Chen, David Dudzinski, Neyat Fiseha, Melvin Joice, Davis Kimaiyo, Mackenzie Martin, Christy Taylor, Kevin Wei, Megan Welch, Daniel A Zlotoff, James L Januzzi, Hanna K Gaggin

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with heart failure (HF) are classically categorised by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Efforts to predict outcomes and response to specific therapy among LVEF-based groups may be suboptimal, in part due to the underlying heterogeneity within clinical HF phenotypes. A multidimensional characterisation of ambulatory patients with and without HF across LVEF groups is needed to better understand and manage patients with HF in a more precise manner.

Methods and analysis: To date, the first cohort of 1313 out of total planned 3000 patients with and without HF has been enroled in this single-centre, longitudinal observational cohort study. Baseline and 1-year follow-up blood samples and clinical characteristics, the presence and duration of comorbidities, serial laboratory, echocardiographic data and images and therapy information will be obtained. HF diagnosis, aetiology of disease, symptom onset and clinical outcomes at 1 and 5 years will be adjudicated by a team of clinicians. Clinical outcomes of interest include all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause hospitalisation, cardiovascular hospitalisation, HF hospitalisation, right-sided HF and acute kidney injury. Results from the Preserved versus Reduced Ejection Fraction Biomarker Registry and Precision Medicine Database for Ambulatory Patients with Heart Failure (PREFER-HF) trial will examine longitudinal clinical characteristics, proteomic, metabolomic, genomic and imaging data to better understand HF phenotypes, with the ultimate goal of improving precision medicine and clinical outcomes for patients with HF.

Ethics and dissemination: Information gathered in this research will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Written informed consent for PREFER-HF was obtained from all participants. All study procedures were approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board in Boston, Massachusetts and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (Protocol Number: 2016P000339).

Trial registration number: PREFER-HF ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03480633.

Keywords: biomarkers; computer simulation; heart failure; research design.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JLJ is a Trustee of the American College of Cardiology, has received grant support from Roche Diagnostics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Abbott Diagnostics, consulting income from Abbott Diagnostics, Janssen, Novartis and Roche Diagnostics, and participates in clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer and Takeda. HKG has received research grant support from Roche Diagnostics, Jana Care, Ortho Clinical, Novartis, Pfizer, Alnylam, Akcea; consulting income from Amgen, Eko, Merck, Roche Diagnostics, Radiometer, Pfizer; Stock ownership for Eko; Research payments for clinical endpoint committees from Radiometer. She has also received research payment for clinical endpoint committees from Baim Institute for Clinical Research for Abbott, Siemens and Beckman Coulter.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of patient enrollment and anticipated impact in the PREFER-HF study. HF, heart failure; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PREFER-HF, Preserved versus Reduced Ejection Fraction Biomarker Registry and Precision Medicine Database for Ambulatory Patients with Heart Failure.

References

    1. Writing Committee members, Yancy CW, Jessup M, et al. . 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of cardiology Foundation/American heart association Task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2013;128:e240–327. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8776
    1. Djoussé L, Driver JA, Gaziano JM. Relation between modifiable lifestyle factors and lifetime risk of heart failure. JAMA 2009;302:394. 10.1001/jama.2009.1062
    1. Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Bishu KG, Fonarow GC, et al. . Trends in health care expenditure among US adults with heart failure: the medical expenditure panel survey 2002-2011. Am Heart J 2017;186:63–72. 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.01.003
    1. Writing Committee, Maddox TM, Januzzi JL, et al. . 2021 update to the 2017 ACC expert consensus decision pathway for optimization of heart failure treatment: answers to 10 pivotal issues about heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a report of the American College of cardiology solution set oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:772–810. 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.022
    1. McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, et al. . Angiotensin–Neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2014;371:993–1004. 10.1056/NEJMoa1409077
    1. McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, et al. . Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2019;381:1995–2008. 10.1056/NEJMoa1911303
    1. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, et al. . Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with Empagliflozin in heart failure. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2020;383:1413–24. 10.1056/NEJMoa2022190
    1. Armstrong PW, Pieske B, Anstrom KJ, et al. . Vericiguat in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1883–93. 10.1056/NEJMoa1915928
    1. Teerlink JR, Diaz R, Felker GM, et al. . Cardiac myosin activation with omecamtiv mecarbil in systolic heart failure. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2021;384:105–16. 10.1056/NEJMoa2025797
    1. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, et al. . The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 1999;341:709–17. 10.1056/NEJM199909023411001
    1. Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, et al. . Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved trial. Lancet 2003;362:777–81. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14285-7
    1. Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Anand IS, et al. . Angiotensin–Neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2019;381:1609–20. 10.1056/NEJMoa1908655
    1. Figtree GA, Rådholm K, Barrett TD, et al. . Effects of canagliflozin on heart failure outcomes associated with preserved and reduced ejection fraction in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2019;139:2591–3. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040057
    1. Shah SJ, Katz DH, Selvaraj S, et al. . Phenomapping for novel classification of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 2015;131:269–79. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010637
    1. Ho JE, Zern EK, Wooster L, et al. . Differential clinical profiles, exercise responses, and outcomes associated with existing HFpEF definitions. Circulation 2019;140:353–65. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.039136
    1. Ahmad T, Pencina MJ, Schulte PJ, et al. . Clinical implications of chronic heart failure phenotypes defined by cluster analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1765–74. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.979
    1. Tromp J, Ouwerkerk W, Demissei BG, et al. . Novel endotypes in heart failure: effects on guideline-directed medical therapy. Eur Heart J 2018;39:4269–76. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy712
    1. Hahn VS, Knutsdottir H, Luo X, et al. . Myocardial gene expression signatures in human heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 2021;143:120–34. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050498
    1. Przewlocka-Kosmala M, Marwick TH, Dabrowski A, et al. . Contribution of cardiovascular reserve to prognostic categories of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a classification based on machine learning. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2019;32:604–15. 10.1016/j.echo.2018.12.002
    1. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. . 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart failure society of America. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:776–803. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.025
    1. Bozkurt B, Coats AJ, Tsutsui H. Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the heart failure Society of America, heart failure association of the European Society of cardiology, Japanese heart failure Society and writing Committee of the universal definition of heart failure. J Card Fail 2021;27:387–413. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.01.022
    1. Voors AA, Anker SD, Cleland JG, et al. . A systems biology study to tailored treatment in chronic heart failure: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of BIOSTAT-CHF. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:716–26. 10.1002/ejhf.531
    1. Tromp J, Westenbrink BD, Ouwerkerk W, et al. . Identifying Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Heart Failure With Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:1081–90. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.050
    1. Tromp J, Khan MAF, Klip IJsbrandT, et al. . Biomarker profiles in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6. 10.1161/JAHA.116.003989. [Epub ahead of print: 30 Mar 2017].
    1. Ahmad T, Lund LH, Rao P, et al. . Machine learning methods improve prognostication, identify clinically distinct phenotypes, and detect heterogeneity in response to therapy in a large cohort of heart failure patients. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e008081. 10.1161/JAHA.117.008081
    1. Lam CSP, Voors AA, Piotr P, et al. . Time to rename the middle child of heart failure: heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2020;41:2353–5. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa158
    1. Lupón J, Bayés-Genís A. Left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure: a clinician's perspective about a dynamic and imperfect parameter, though still convenient and a cornerstone for patient classification and management. Eur J Heart Fail 2018;20:433–5. 10.1002/ejhf.1116
    1. Parikh KS, Sharma K, Fiuzat M. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction expert panel report: current controversies and implications for clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol HF 2018;6:619–32. 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.06.008
    1. Cleland JGF, Bunting KV, Flather MD, et al. . Beta-blockers for heart failure with reduced, mid-range, and preserved ejection fraction: an individual patient-level analysis of double-blind randomized trials. Eur Heart J 2018;39:26–35. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx564
    1. Solomon SD, Claggett B, Lewis EF, et al. . Influence of ejection fraction on outcomes and efficacy of spironolactone in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2016;37:455–62. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv464
    1. McMurray JJV, Jackson AM, Lam CSP, et al. . Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan versus valsartan in women compared with men with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 2020;141:338–51. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044491
    1. Solomon SD, Vaduganathan M, L Claggett B, et al. . Sacubitril/Valsartan across the spectrum of ejection fraction in heart failure. Circulation 2020;141:352–61. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044586
    1. Bayes-Genis A, Lupón J. Heart failure is ejection fraction in motion. Eur J Heart Fail 2021;23:564–6. 10.1002/ejhf.2185
    1. Zhang Y, Guallar E, Blasco-Colmenares E. Changes in follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction associated with outcomes in primary prevention ICD and CRT-D recipients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:524–31. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.057
    1. Savarese G, Vedin O, D'Amario D, et al. . Prevalence and prognostic implications of longitudinal ejection fraction change in heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2019;7:306–17. 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.11.019
    1. Dunlay SM, Roger VL, Weston SA, et al. . Longitudinal changes in ejection fraction in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail 2012;5:720–6. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.966366
    1. Segar MW, Patel KV, Ayers C, et al. . Phenomapping of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using machine learning-based unsupervised cluster analysis. Eur J Heart Fail 2020;22:148–58. 10.1002/ejhf.1621
    1. Kao DP, Lewsey JD, Anand IS, et al. . Characterization of subgroups of heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction with possible implications for prognosis and treatment response. Eur J Heart Fail 2015;17:925–35. 10.1002/ejhf.327
    1. Woolley RJ, Ceelen D, Ouwerkerk W, et al. . Machine learning based on biomarker profiles identifies distinct subgroups of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2021;23:983–91. 10.1002/ejhf.2144
    1. Joseph P, Dokainish H, McCready T, et al. . A multinational registry to study the characteristics and outcomes of heart failure patients: the global congestive heart failure (G-CHF) registry. Am Heart J 2020;227:56–63. 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.002
    1. Linde C, Eriksson MJ, Hage C, et al. . Rationale and design of the PREFERS (preserved and reduced ejection fraction epidemiological regional study) Stockholm heart failure study: an epidemiological regional study in Stockholm County of 2.1 million inhabitants. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:1287–97. 10.1002/ejhf.599
    1. Kanagala P, Arnold JR, Singh A, et al. . Characterizing heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction: an imaging and plasma biomarker approach. PLoS One 2020;15:e0232280. 10.1371/journal.pone.0232280
    1. Gandhi PU, Gaggin HK, Sheftel AD, et al. . Prognostic usefulness of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a novel biomarker of myocardial diastolic function? Am J Cardiol 2014;114:1543–9. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.08.018
    1. Kashani K, Al-Khafaji A, Ardiles T, et al. . Discovery and validation of cell cycle arrest biomarkers in human acute kidney injury. Crit Care 2013;17:R25. 10.1186/cc12503
    1. Gandhi PU, Gaggin HK, Redfield MM, et al. . Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7 as a biomarker of diastolic dysfunction and functional gapacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Results from the RELAX trial. JACC Heart Fail 2016;4:860–9. 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.08.002
    1. Meyer S, van der Meer P, van Deursen VM, et al. . Neurohormonal and clinical sex differences in heart failure. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2538–47. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht152
    1. Wesseling M, de Poel JHC, de Jager SCA. Growth differentiation factor 15 in adverse cardiac remodelling: from biomarker to causal player. ESC Heart Fail 2020;7:1488–501. 10.1002/ehf2.12728
    1. Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Kinross J, et al. . Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science 2012;336:1262–7. 10.1126/science.1223813
    1. Tang WHW, Li DY, Hazen SL. Dietary metabolism, the gut microbiome, and heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol 2019;16:137–54. 10.1038/s41569-018-0108-7
    1. Heianza Y, Ma W, Manson JE, et al. . Gut microbiota metabolites and risk of major adverse cardiovascular disease events and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6. 10.1161/JAHA.116.004947. [Epub ahead of print: 29 Jun 2017].
    1. Roncal C, Martínez-Aguilar E, Orbe J, et al. . Trimethylamine-N-Oxide (TMAO) predicts cardiovascular mortality in peripheral artery disease. Sci Rep 2019;9:15580. 10.1038/s41598-019-52082-z
    1. Heianza Y, Ma W, DiDonato JA, et al. . Long-Term changes in gut microbial metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide and coronary heart disease risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:763–72. 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.060
    1. Tang WHW, Bäckhed F, Landmesser U, et al. . Intestinal microbiota in cardiovascular health and disease: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:2089–105. 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.024
    1. Tang WHW, Wang Z, Fan Y, et al. . Prognostic value of elevated levels of intestinal microbe-generated metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide in patients with heart failure: Refining the gut hypothesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1908–14. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.617

Source: PubMed

Подписаться