Phase 1 and pharmacokinetic study of everolimus in combination with cetuximab and carboplatin for recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Nabil F Saba, Selwyn J Hurwitz, Kelly Magliocca, Sungjin Kim, Taofeek K Owonikoko, Donald Harvey, Suresh S Ramalingam, Zhengjia Chen, Jackie Rogerio, Jennifer Mendel, Scott A Kono, Colleen Lewis, Amy Y Chen, Kristin Higgins, Mark El-Deiry, Trad Wadsworth, Jonathan J Beitler, Dong M Shin, Shi-Yong Sun, Fadlo R Khuri, Nabil F Saba, Selwyn J Hurwitz, Kelly Magliocca, Sungjin Kim, Taofeek K Owonikoko, Donald Harvey, Suresh S Ramalingam, Zhengjia Chen, Jackie Rogerio, Jennifer Mendel, Scott A Kono, Colleen Lewis, Amy Y Chen, Kristin Higgins, Mark El-Deiry, Trad Wadsworth, Jonathan J Beitler, Dong M Shin, Shi-Yong Sun, Fadlo R Khuri

Abstract

Background: Platinum-based therapy combined with cetuximab is standard first-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (RMSCCHN). Preclinical studies have suggested that mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors may overcome resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor blockers and may augment cetuximab antitumor activity. We conducted a phase 1b trial of carboplatin, cetuximab, and everolimus for untreated RMSCCHN.

Methods: Patients received carboplatin (area under the curve = 2 mg/ml/min; 3 weeks on, 1 week off), cetuximab (with a loading dose of 400 mg/m(2) and then 250 mg/m(2) weekly), and dose-escalating everolimus (2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10 mg/day) with a 3+3 design. After 4 cycles, patients without progression continued cetuximab/everolimus until progression or intolerable toxicity. Patients (age ≥ 18 years) had previously untreated, unresectable RMSCCHN not amenable to radiotherapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2.

Results: The study enrolled 20 patients (male/female = 18/2) with RMSCCHN; the median age was 65 years (44-75 years). Thirteen patients received everolimus (male/female = 92%). Two of 6 patients receiving 2.5 mg/day experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) with grade 3 hyponatremia and nausea. In 7 patients receiving de-escalated everolimus (2.5 mg every other day), grade 3 hyperglycemia produced DLT in 1 of 6 patients. The objective response rate (RR) was 61.5% (all partial responses). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.15 months. The pharmacokinetics of everolimus was described with a 2-compartment mixed-effects model. There was a significant correlation between tumor p-p44/42 staining and response (P = .044) and a marginally significant correlation between phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin and overall survival.

Conclusions: The maximum tolerated dose of everolimus with cetuximab and carboplatin was 2.5 mg every other day. The regimen was associated with an encouraging RR and PFS, and this suggested possible clinical efficacy in a select group of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Keywords: everolimus in head and neck cancer; everolimus in squamous cell carcinoma; everolimus, cetuximab, and carboplatin; mTOR inhibition in head and neck cancer; mTOR inhibition in squamous cell carcinoma; pharmacokinetics, and NONMEM.

© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться