Psychological costs of inadequate cervical smear test results

D P French, E Maissi, T M Marteau, D P French, E Maissi, T M Marteau

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate, for the first time, the psychological impact of an inadequate smear test result. A prospective questionnaire design was used, and the setting was a single English cervical screening laboratory. Two groups of women receiving either a normal test result (n=226) or either a first or nonconsecutive inadequate smear test result (n=180) participated. The main outcome measures included State anxiety (STAI) and concern about test result, assessed within 4 weeks of receipt of results, and attendance for a repeat cervical smear within 3 months. Compared to women with normal test results, women with inadequate smear test results had higher state anxiety (P=0.025), were more concerned about their results (P<0.001), perceived themselves to be at higher risk of cervical cancer (P=0.016), and felt less satisfied with the information they had received about their test results (P<0.001). The only predictor of attendance for a repeat smear test following an inadequate smear test result was state anxiety (P=0.011): nonattenders had higher levels of state anxiety in response to their initial test results. In conclusion, in this first study to assess the psychological impact of receiving an inadequate smear test result, we have shown that it raises state anxiety and concern to levels similar to those found in women with abnormal smear test results. Of particular concern is that anxious women are less likely to attend for a repeat smear test within the recommended time frame. Given the millions of women each year receiving this test result, research is now needed to ascertain how the anxiety associated with this result can be avoided.

References

    1. Bower GH (1981) Mood and memory. Am Psychol 36: 129–148
    1. Brett J, Austoker J (2001) Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance. J Public Health Med 23: 292–300
    1. Cioffi D (1994) When good news is bad news: medical wellness as a nonevent in undergraduates. Health Psychol 13: 63–72
    1. Department of Health (2003) Cervical Screening Programme, England: 2002–03 Bulletin 2003/24. London: Department of Health
    1. Gigerenzer G (2002) Calculated risks: How to Know When Numbers Deceive You. New York: Simon & Schuster
    1. Hock YL, Ramaiah S, Wall ES, Harris AM, Marston L, Marshall J, Kendall K, Teale A (2003) Outcome of women with inadequate cervical smears up to five years. J Clin Pathol 56: 592–595
    1. Jemmott JB, Ditto PH, Croyle RT (1986) Judging health status: effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. J Pers Soc Psychol 50: 899–905
    1. Lerman C, Miller SM, Scarborough R, Hanjani P, Nolte S, Smith D (1991) Adverse psychologic consequences of positive cytologic cervical screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165: 658–662
    1. Maissi E, Marteau TM, Hankins M, Moss S, Legood R, Gray A (2004) The psychological impact of human papilloma virus testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear test results: a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. Br Med J 328: 1293–1296
    1. Marteau TM, Bekker H (1992) The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol 31: 301–306
    1. Marteau TM, Senior V, Sasieni P (2001) Women's understanding of a ‘normal smear test result’: experimental questionnaire based study. Br Med J 322: 526–528
    1. Marteau TM, Walker P, Giles J, Smail M (1990) Anxieties in women undergoing colposcopy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 7: 859–861
    1. Moss SM, Gray A, Marteau TM, Legood R, Henstock E, Maissi E (2004) Evaluation of LBC/ HPV pilot studies. Report submitted to the Department of Health
    1. Murray M, McMillan C (1993) Health beliefs, locus of control, emotional control and women's cancer screening behavior. Br J Clin Psychol 32: 87–100
    1. Nerenz DR, Leventhal H, Love RR (1982) Factors contributing to emotional distress during cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 50: 1020–1027
    1. Renner B (2004) Biased reasoning: adaptive responses to health risk feedback. Pers Soc Psychol B 30: 384–396
    1. Rogstad KE (2002) The psychological impact of abnormal cytology and colposcopy. BJOG – Int J Obstet Gy 109: 364–368
    1. Saidi G, Sutton S, Bickler G (1998) A predictive study of reasons for attendance and non-attendance at a breast screening programme. Psychol Health 13: 23–33
    1. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Luschene RE (1970) State Trait Anxiety Inventory Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press

Source: PubMed

Подписаться