Bipolar ablation of therapy-refractory ventricular arrhythmias: application of a dedicated approach

Shinwan Kany, Fares Alexander Alken, Ruben Schleberger, Jakub Baran, Armin Luik, Annika Haas, Elena Ene, Thomas Deneke, L Dinshaw, Andreas Rillig, Andreas Metzner, Bruno Reissmann, Hisaki Makimoto, Tilko Reents, Miruna Andrea Popa, Isabel Deisenhofer, Roman Piotrowski, Piotr Kulakowski, Paulus Kirchhof, Katharina Scherschel, Christian Meyer, Shinwan Kany, Fares Alexander Alken, Ruben Schleberger, Jakub Baran, Armin Luik, Annika Haas, Elena Ene, Thomas Deneke, L Dinshaw, Andreas Rillig, Andreas Metzner, Bruno Reissmann, Hisaki Makimoto, Tilko Reents, Miruna Andrea Popa, Isabel Deisenhofer, Roman Piotrowski, Piotr Kulakowski, Paulus Kirchhof, Katharina Scherschel, Christian Meyer

Abstract

Aims: Bipolar radiofrequency ablation (B-RFA) has been reported as a bail-out strategy for the treatment of therapy refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Currently, existing setups have not been standardized for B-RFA, while the impact of conventional B-RFA approaches on lesion formation remains unclear.

Methods and results: (i) In a multicentre observational study, patients undergoing B-RFA for previously therapy-refractory VA using a dedicated B-RFA setup were retrospectively analysed. (ii) Additionally, in an ex vivo model lesion formation during B-RFA was evaluated using porcine hearts. In a total of 26 procedures (24 patients), acute success was achieved in all 14 ventricular tachycardia (VT) procedures and 7/12 procedures with premature ventricular contractions (PVC), with major complications occurring in 1 procedure (atrioventricular block). During a median follow-up of 211 days in 21 patients, 6/11 patients (VT) and 5/10 patients (PVC) remained arrhythmia-free. Lesion formation in the ex vivo model during energy titration from 30 to 50 W led to similar lesion volumes compared with initial high-power 50 W B-RFA. Lesion size significantly increased when combining sequential unipolar and B-RFA (1429 mm3 vs. titration 501 mm3 vs. B-RFA 50 W 423 mm3, P < 0.001), an approach used in overall 58% of procedures and more frequently applied in procedures without VA recurrence (92% vs. 36%, P = 0.009). Adipose tissue severely limited lesion formation during B-RFA.

Conclusion: Using a dedicated device for B-RFA for therapy-refractory VA appears feasible and safe. While some patients need repeat ablation, success rates were encouraging. Sequential unipolar and B-RFA may be favourable for lesion formation.

Keywords: Bipolar ablation; Premature ventricular contractions; Radiofrequency generator; Ventricular arrhythmias; Ventricular tachycardia.

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical and ex vivo bipolar ablation setup. (A) Schematic overview on custom-made solutions and presented approach using a dedicated radiofrequency (RF) generator setup for bipolar ablation. (B) Experimental setup of custom catheter guiding blocks in a temperature-controlled saline bath with two irrigated 3.5 mm ablation catheters on either side. (C) Catheters are connected to a single ablation generator with two separate irrigation pumps.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mid-term follow-up after bipolar ablation. (A) Freedom of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) was observed in 59% of patients within 12 months after initial B-RFA. (B) Lower VA recurrence rates were observed in patients with unipolar ablation followed by bipolar ablation (UA+B-RFA) compared with B-RFA alone. B-RFA, bipolar radiofrequency ablation; UA, unipolar ablation; VA, ventricular arrhythmia.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lesion formation during common clinical bipolar ablation approaches. (A) Lesion volume and depth significantly increased after combination of sequential unipolar (SUA) and bipolar ablation (B-RFA), whereas energy titration did not significantly alter macroscopic lesion characteristics. (B) B-RFA with 50 W in regions of significant epicardial adipose tissue (EA) close to the coronary sinus (CS) significantly reduced lesion volume and depth compared with B-RFA at regions without EA. Commonly, no lesion was visible at the epicardial site (upper right image). B-RFA, bipolar radiofrequency ablation; EA, epicardial adipose tissue; SUA, sequential unipolar ablation.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться