The impact of chronic migraine: The Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study methods and baseline results

Aubrey Manack Adams, Daniel Serrano, Dawn C Buse, Michael L Reed, Valerie Marske, Kristina M Fanning, Richard B Lipton, Aubrey Manack Adams, Daniel Serrano, Dawn C Buse, Michael L Reed, Valerie Marske, Kristina M Fanning, Richard B Lipton

Abstract

Background: Longitudinal migraine studies have rarely assessed headache frequency and disability variation over a year.

Methods: The Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study is a cross-sectional and longitudinal Internet study designed to characterize the course of episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). Participants were recruited from a Web-panel using quota sampling in an attempt to obtain a sample demographically similar to the US population. Participants who passed the screener were assessed every three months with the Core (baseline, six, and 12 months) and Snapshot (months three and nine) modules, which assessed headache frequency, headache-related disability, treatments, and treatment satisfaction. The Core also assessed resource use, health-related quality of life, and other features. One-time cross-sectional modules measured family burden, barriers to medical care, and comorbidities/endophenotypes.

Results: Of 489,537 invitees, we obtained 58,418 (11.9%) usable returns including 16,789 individuals who met ICHD-3 beta migraine criteria (EM (<15 headache days/mo): n = 15,313 (91.2%); CM (≥ 15 headache days/mo): n = 1476 (8.8%)). At baseline, all qualified respondents (n = 16,789) completed the Screener, Core, and Barriers to Care modules. Subsequent modules showed some attrition (Comorbidities/Endophenotypes, n = 12,810; Family Burden (Proband), n = 13,064; Family Burden (Partner), n = 4022; Family Burden (Child), n = 2140; Snapshot (three months), n = 9741; Core (six months), n = 7517; Snapshot (nine months), n = 6362; Core (12 months), n = 5915). A total of 3513 respondents (21.0%) completed all modules, and 3626 (EM: n = 3303 (21.6%); CM: n = 323 (21.9%)) completed all longitudinal assessments.

Conclusions: The CaMEO Study provides cross-sectional and longitudinal data that will contribute to our understanding of the course of migraine over one year and quantify variations in headache frequency, headache-related disability, comorbidities, treatments, and familial impact.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01648530.

Keywords: Migraine disorders; chronic migraine; epidemiology; episodic migraine; headache.

© International Headache Society 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Participant flow diagram. CM: chronic migraine; EM: episodic migraine; FBM: Family Burden Module; CaMEO: Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes Study. aN = 22,365 respondents either abandoned the survey (<20% of the survey was complete and headache status could not be identified), were over-quota, or had unusable data, which left 58,418 with usable returns. bBaseline-sampling was quota based with the limit for the migraine sample defined as n = 17,000. Respondents who replied after quotas had been reached, but before initiation of the next sampling wave, were deemed over-quota and not included. Of the quota sample, n = 16,789 met the inclusion criteria: agreed to participate, screened positive for modified ICHD-3 beta migraine, completed initial surveys in a reasonable time (≥10 minutes), were 18 years old, were not missing headache frequency data, and reported consistent age and sex (of the 17,000 people in the migraine sample, as defined by the quotas, 211 (1.2%)) were removed during data cleaning (Table 2)). Migraine case rate was 28.7% (16,789/58,418). cBecause of the risk of potentially low response rates for the Family Burden Module, respondents who were considered to be over-quota for CaMEO were resampled for the Family Burden Module only. Data from these over-quota respondents were not used for any other module.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Study design. N = number of returns for that module only, and does not represent a running total of participation in previous modules. Module completion dates are as follows. Stage 1: Screening, Wave 1 Core, and Barriers to Care, September 17–October 30, 2012. Stage 2: Comorbidities/Endophenotypes, October 10–December 17, 2012; at the conclusion of wave 4 and before start of wave 5, nonrespondents to the Comorbidities/Endophenotypes Module were resampled (August 19–October 3, 2013). Family Burden-Proband, November 14, 2012–January 28, 2013. Family Burden-Partner, November 30, 2012–October 30, 2013. Family Burden-Child, January 11–October 30, 2013; at conclusion of wave 3 and before wave 4, nonrespondents to the Family Burden Survey were resampled (Proband, April 22–September 4, 2013; Partner, May 7–October 30, 2013; Child: May 3–October 30, 2013). Stage 3: Wave 2 Snapshot, December 21, 2012–February 19, 2013. Wave 3 Core, March 20–May 15, 2013. Wave 4 Snapshot, June 20–August 19, 2013. Wave 5 Core, September 19–November 19, 2013. For Wave 1 Core, no cases could attrit; the total returns screening positive for migraine were n = 17,000 out of n = 58,629 (these cases plus the n = 10,044 who were over-quota and n = 12,110 who abandoned produce the total returns of n = 80,783); of these, n = 211 (1.2%) were removed during cleaning, resulting in a final sample of n = 16,789 qualified respondents. All five waves of longitudinal assessments were completed by n = 3626 of n = 16,789 (21.6%) respondents; four of five waves by n = 2364 (14.1%), three of five waves by n = 2415 (14.4%), two of five waves by n = 3109 (18.5%), and only one wave (i.e. baseline) by n = 5275 (31.4%).

References

    1. Victor TW, Hu X, Campbell JC, et al. Migraine prevalence by age and sex in the United States: A life-span study. Cephalalgia 2010; 30: 1065–1072.
    1. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, et al. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 2007; 68: 343–349.
    1. Buse DC, Loder EW, Gorman JA, et al. Sex differences in the prevalence, symptoms, and associated features of migraine, probable migraine and other severe headache: Results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Headache 2013; 53: 1278–1299.
    1. Manack A, Turkel C, Silberstein S. The evolution of chronic migraine: Classification and nomenclature. Headache 2009; 49: 1206–1213.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 629–808.
    1. Buse DC, Manack AN, Fanning KM, et al. Chronic migraine prevalence, disability, and sociodemographic factors: Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study. Headache 2012; 52: 1456–1470.
    1. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S, et al. Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: Data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache 2001; 41: 646–657.
    1. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Celentano DD, et al. Prevalence of migraine headache in the United States. Relation to age, income, race, and other sociodemographic factors. JAMA 1992; 267: 64–69.
    1. Blumenfeld AM, Varon SF, Wilcox TK, et al. Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Cephalalgia 2011; 31: 301–315.
    1. Payne KA, Varon SF, Kawata AK, et al. The International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS): Study design, methodology, and baseline cohort characteristics. Cephalalgia 2011; 31: 1116–1130.
    1. Wang SJ, Wang PJ, Fuh JL, et al. Comparisons of disability, quality of life, and resource use between chronic and episodic migraineurs: A clinic-based study in Taiwan. Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 171–181.
    1. Katsarava Z, Manack A, Yoon MS, et al. Chronic migraine: Classification and comparisons. Cephalalgia 2011; 31: 520–529.
    1. Scher AI, Stewart WF, Liberman J, et al. Prevalence of frequent headache in a population sample. Headache 1998; 38: 497–506.
    1. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Liberman J. Variation in migraine prevalence by race. Neurology 1996; 47: 52–59.
    1. Stovner L, Hagen K, Jensen R, et al. The global burden of headache: A documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia 2007; 27: 193–210.
    1. Natoli JL, Manack A, Dean B, et al. Global prevalence of chronic migraine: A systematic review. Cephalalgia 2010; 30: 599–609.
    1. Katsarava Z, Buse DC, Manack AN, et al. Defining the differences between episodic migraine and chronic migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2012; 16: 86–92.
    1. Bigal ME, Serrano D, Reed M, et al. Chronic migraine in the population: Burden, diagnosis, and satisfaction with treatment. Neurology 2008; 71: 559–566.
    1. Ferrari A, Leone S, Vergoni AV, et al. Similarities and differences between chronic migraine and episodic migraine. Headache 2007; 47: 65–72.
    1. Buse DC, Manack AN, Serrano D, et al. Headache impact of chronic and episodic migraine: Results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention study. Headache 2012; 52: 3–17.
    1. Stokes M, Becker WJ, Lipton RB, et al. Cost of health care among patients with chronic and episodic migraine in Canada and the USA: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Headache 2011; 51: 1058–1077.
    1. Bloudek LM, Stokes M, Buse DC, et al. Cost of healthcare for patients with migraine in five European countries: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). J Headache Pain 2012; 13: 361–378.
    1. Meletiche DM, Lofland JH, Young WB. Quality-of-life differences between patients with episodic and transformed migraine. Headache 2001; 41: 573–578.
    1. Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Excessive acute migraine medication use and migraine progression. Neurology 2008; 71: 1821–1828.
    1. Bigal ME, Lipton RB. Clinical course in migraine: Conceptualizing migraine transformation. Neurology 2008; 71: 848–855.
    1. Manack A, Buse DC, Serrano D, et al. Rates, predictors, and consequences of remission from chronic migraine to episodic migraine. Neurology 2011; 76: 711–718.
    1. Manack AN, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Chronic migraine: Epidemiology and disease burden. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2011; 15: 70–78.
    1. Bigal ME, Lipton RB. What predicts the change from episodic to chronic migraine? Curr Opin Neurol 2009; 22: 269–276.
    1. Horowitz M, Schaefer C, Hiroto D, et al. Life event questionnaires for measuring presumptive stress. Psychosom Med 1977; 39: 413–431.
    1. Lipton RB, Diamond S, Reed M, et al. Migraine diagnosis and treatment: Results from the American Migraine Study II. Headache 2001; 41: 638–645.
    1. Liebenstein M, Bigal M, Sheftell F, et al. Validation of the Chronic Daily Headache Questionnaire (CDH-Q), abstract F25. Presented at: 49th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society, Chicago, IL, June 7–11, 2007.
    1. Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Sliwinski M. Classification of daily and near-daily headaches: Field trial of revised IHS criteria. Neurology 1996; 47: 871–875.
    1. Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Solomon S, et al. Classification of daily and near-daily headaches in the headache clinic. Proposed revisions to the International Headache Society criteria. In: Olesen J. (ed). Frontiers in headache research, New York: Raven Press Ltd, 1994, pp. 117–126.
    1. Stovner LJ, Andree C. Eurolight Steering Committee. Impact of headache in Europe: A review for the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain 2008; 9: 139–146.
    1. Stovner LJ, Zwart JA, Hagen K, et al. Epidemiology of headache in Europe. Eur J Neurol 2006; 13: 333–345.
    1. Buse DC, Manack A, Serrano D, et al. Sociodemographic and comorbidity profiles of chronic migraine and episodic migraine sufferers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010; 81: 428–432.
    1. Olesen J, Bousser MG, Diener HC, et al. New appendix criteria open for a broader concept of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 2006; 26: 742–746.
    1. Bigal ME, Rapoport AM, Lipton RB, et al. Assessment of migraine disability using the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire: A comparison of chronic migraine with episodic migraine. Headache 2003; 43: 336–342.
    1. Wang SJ, Wang PJ, Fuh JL, et al. Comparisons of disability, quality of life, and resource use between chronic and episodic migraineurs: A clinic-based study in Taiwan. Cephalalgia 2013; 33: 171–181.
    1. Ekholm O, Gundgaard J, Rasmussen NK, et al. The effect of health, socio-economic position, and mode of data collection on non-response in health interview surveys. Scand J Public Health 2010; 38: 699–706.
    1. Wyatt JC. When to use web-based surveys. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000; 7: 426–429.
    1. Choi NG, Dinitto DM. The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: e93–e93.
    1. Rainie L. Internet, broadband, and cell phone statistics. (accessed 26 August 2014).
    1. Zickuhr K and Smith A. Digital differences. (accessed 26 August 2014).

Source: PubMed

Подписаться