Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine and Pertuzumab in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: Three-Year Outcomes From the Phase III KRISTINE Study

Sara A Hurvitz, Miguel Martin, Kyung Hae Jung, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Nadia Harbeck, Vicente Valero, Daniil Stroyakovskiy, Hans Wildiers, Mario Campone, Jean-François Boileau, Peter A Fasching, Karen Afenjar, Gonzalo Spera, Vanesa Lopez-Valverde, Chunyan Song, Peter Trask, Thomas Boulet, Joseph A Sparano, W Fraser Symmans, Alastair M Thompson, Dennis Slamon, Sara A Hurvitz, Miguel Martin, Kyung Hae Jung, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Nadia Harbeck, Vicente Valero, Daniil Stroyakovskiy, Hans Wildiers, Mario Campone, Jean-François Boileau, Peter A Fasching, Karen Afenjar, Gonzalo Spera, Vanesa Lopez-Valverde, Chunyan Song, Peter Trask, Thomas Boulet, Joseph A Sparano, W Fraser Symmans, Alastair M Thompson, Dennis Slamon

Abstract

Purpose: The KRISTINE study compared neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab (T-DM1+P) with docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab plus P (TCH+P) for the treatment human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive stage II to III breast cancer. T-DM1+P led to a lower pathologic complete response rate (44.4% v 55.7%; P = .016), but fewer grade 3 or greater and serious adverse events (AEs). Here, we present 3-year outcomes from KRISTINE.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant T-DM1+P or TCH+P every 3 weeks for six cycles. Patients who received T-DM1+P continued adjuvant T-DM1+P, and patients who received TCH+P received adjuvant trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. Secondary end points included event-free survival (EFS), overall survival, patient-reported outcomes (measured from random assignment), and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS; measured from surgery).

Results: Of patients, 444 were randomly assigned (T-DM1+P, n = 223; TCH+P, n = 221). Median follow-up was 37 months. Risk of an EFS event was higher with TDM-1+P (hazard ratio [HR], 2.61 [95% CI, 1.36 to 4.98]) with more locoregional progression events before surgery (15 [6.7%] v 0). Risk of an IDFS event after surgery was similar between arms (HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.52 to 2.40]). Pathologic complete response was associated with a reduced risk of an IDFS event (HR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.60]) regardless of treatment arm. Overall, grade 3 or greater AEs (31.8% v 67.7%) were less common with T-DM1+P. During adjuvant treatment, grade 3 or greater AEs (24.5% v 9.9%) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (18.4% v 3.8%) were more common with T-DM1+P. Patient-reported outcomes favored T-DM1+P during neoadjuvant treatment and were similar to trastuzumab plus pertuzumab during adjuvant treatment.

Conclusion: Compared with TCH+P, T-DM1+P resulted in a higher risk of an EFS event owing to locoregional progression events before surgery, a similar risk of an IDFS event, fewer grade 3 or greater AEs during neoadjuvant treatment, and more AEs leading to treatment discontinuation during adjuvant treatment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02131064.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Patient disposition. EFS, event-free survival; IDFS, invasive disease-free survival; TCH+P, docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab plus pertuzumab; T-DM1+P, trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
(A) Kaplan-Meier analysis of event-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Event-free survival was defined as the time from random assignment to disease progression (including local progression before surgery), disease recurrence (local, regional, distant, ipsilateral noninvasive, or contralateral [invasive or noninvasive]), or death from any cause. (B-D) Kaplan-Meier analysis of invasive disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population who underwent surgery according to (B) treatment arm, (C) pathologic complete response (pCR) status, and (D) treatment arm and pCR status. Invasive disease-free survival was defined as the time from surgery to the first documented occurrence of ipsilateral invasive local recurrence, ipsilateral locoregional invasive recurrence, distant recurrence, contralateral invasive breast cancer, or death from any cause. TCH+P, docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab plus pertuzumab; T-DM1+P, trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Patient-reported outcomes during the overall study period for patients in the intention-to-treat population. Graphs depict mean change from baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire−C30 for domains of (A) global health status, (B) physical functioning, (C) cognitive functioning, and (D) diarrhea. Baseline is defined as neoadjuvant cycle 1, day 1. TCH+P, docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab plus pertuzumab; T-DM1+P, trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab.

References

    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast cancer (version 4.2018)
    1. Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): A randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet. 2010;375:377–384.
    1. Untch M, Fasching PA, Konecny GE, et al. Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab predicts favorable survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: Results from the TECHNO trial of the AGO and GBG study groups. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3351–3357.
    1. Guarneri V, Frassoldati A, Bottini A, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer: Results of the randomized phase II CHER-LOB study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1989–1995.
    1. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, et al. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): A randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:25–32.
    1. Baselga J, Bradbury I, Eidtmann H, et al. Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): A randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2012;379:633–640. Erratum: Lancet 379:616, 2012.
    1. Robidoux A, Tang G, Rastogi P, et al. Lapatinib as a component of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive operable breast cancer (NSABP protocol B-41): An open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1183–1192.
    1. Carey LA, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT, et al. Molecular heterogeneity and response to neoadjuvant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 targeting in CALGB 40601, a randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab with or without lapatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:542–549.
    1. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: The CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:164–172.
    1. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, et al. 5-year analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): A multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:791–800.
    1. de Azambuja E, Holmes AP, Piccart-Gebhart M, et al. Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): Survival outcomes of a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial and their association with pathological complete response. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1137–1146.
    1. Hurvitz SA, Martin M, Symmans WF, et al. Neoadjuvant trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and chemotherapy versus trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (KRISTINE): A randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:115–126.
    1. Krop IE, Kim SB, González-Martín A, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine versus treatment of physician’s choice for pretreated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (TH3RESA): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:689–699.
    1. Perez EA, Barrios C, Eiermann W, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine with or without pertuzumab versus trastuzumab plus taxane for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, advanced breast cancer: Primary results from the phase III MARIANNE study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:141–148.
    1. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138:241–256.
    1. Hudis CA, Barlow WE, Costantino JP, et al. Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: The STEEP system. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2127–2132.
    1. Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. ed 3. Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; 2001.
    1. Baselga J, Lewis Phillips GD, Verma S, et al. Relationship between tumor biomarkers and efficacy in EMILIA, a phase III study of trastuzumab emtansine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:3755–3763. Erratum: Clin Cancer Res 24:5486, 2018.
    1. Kim SB, Wildiers H, Krop IE, et al. Relationship between tumor biomarkers and efficacy in TH3RESA, a phase III study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) vs. treatment of physician’s choice in previously treated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2016;139:2336–2342.
    1. von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for residual HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:617–628.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться