Different circulating biomarkers in women and men with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the AF-RISK and RACE V studies

Ruben R De With, Vicente Artola Arita, Bao-Oanh Nguyen, Dominik Linz, Hugo Ten Cate, Henri Spronk, Ulrich Schotten, Anton Jan van Zonneveld, Ömer Erküner, M Agustina Bayón, Anders S Schmidt, Justin G L M Luermans, Harry J G M Crijns, Isabelle C Van Gelder, Michiel Rienstra, Ruben R De With, Vicente Artola Arita, Bao-Oanh Nguyen, Dominik Linz, Hugo Ten Cate, Henri Spronk, Ulrich Schotten, Anton Jan van Zonneveld, Ömer Erküner, M Agustina Bayón, Anders S Schmidt, Justin G L M Luermans, Harry J G M Crijns, Isabelle C Van Gelder, Michiel Rienstra

Abstract

Aims: The clinical risk profile of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is different in men and women. Our aim was to identify sex differences in blood biomarkers in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Methods and results: Sex differences in 92 blood biomarkers were measured in 364 patients included in our discovery cohort, the identification of a risk profile to guide atrial fibrillation therapy (AF-RISK) study, assessed by multivariable logistic regression and enrichment pathway analysis. Findings were subsequently confirmed in 213 patients included in our validation cohort, the Reappraisal of Atrial Fibrillation: Interaction between HyperCoagulability, Electrical remodelling, and Vascular Destabilisation in the Progression of AF (RACE V) study. In the discovery cohort, mean age was 59 ± 12 years, 41% were women. CHA2DS2-VASc-score was 1.6 ± 1.4. A total of 46% had hypertension, 10% diabetes, and 50% had heart failure, predominantly with preserved ejection fraction (47%). In women, activated leucocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM) and fatty acid binding protein-4 (FABP-4) were higher. In men, matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), C-C motif chemokine-16 (CCL-16), and myoglobin were higher. In the validation cohort, four out of five biomarkers could be confirmed: levels of ALCAM (P = 1.73 × 10-4) and FABP-4 (P = 2.46 × 10-7) and adhesion biological pathways [false discovery rate (FDR) = 1.23 × 10-8] were higher in women. In men, levels of MMP-3 (P = 4.31 × 10-8) and myoglobin (P = 2.10 × 10-4) and markers for extracellular matrix degradation biological pathways (FDR = 3.59 × 10-9) were higher.

Conclusion: In women with paroxysmal AF, inflammatory biomarkers were more often higher, while in men with paroxysmal AF, biomarkers for vascular remodelling were higher. Our data support the clinical notion that pathophysiological mechanisms in women and men with AF may differ.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01510210 for AF-RISK; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02726698 for RACE V.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Blood biomarkers; Inflammation; Sex differences; Vascular disease.

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Blood biomarker sex differences in discovery cohort. ALCAM, activated leucocyte cell adhesion molecule; CCL-16, C-C motif chemokine-16; CI, confidence interval; FABP-4, fatty acid binding protein-4; MMP-3, matrix metalloproteinase-3; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pathway enrichment analysis of biomarkers confirmed in validation cohort. (A) Pathway enrichment analysis with layers of proteins on validated biomarkers in women in comparison to men from both cohorts. (B) Pathway enrichment analysis with layers of proteins on validated biomarkers in men in comparison to women from both cohorts. (C) Biological processes with higher FDR in women in comparison to men. Colours represent biological processes in which the proteins (nodes) are involved as depicted in A. (D) Biological processes with higher FDR in women in comparison to men. Colours represent biological processes in which the proteins (nodes) are involved as depicted in B. ACAN, aggrecan; ALCAM, activated leucocyte cell adhesion molecule; CD6, T-cell differentiation antigen CD6; CNTN1, contactin-1; DCN, decorin; DMP1, dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein 1; FDR, false discovery rate; GO, Gene Ontology; ICAM1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; ITGA4, integrin subunit alpha 4; ITGAD, integrin subunit alpha D; ITGAL, integrin subunit alpha L; ITGAM, integrin subunit alpha M; ITGAX, integrin subunit alpha X; ITGB2, integrin subunit beta 2; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; MMP10, integrin subunit beta 2; MMP3, matrix metalloproteinase-3; PLG, plasminogen; SPP1, secreted phosphoprotein 1; TIMP1, metallopeptidase inhibitor 1.

References

    1. Magnussen C, Niiranen TJ, Ojeda FM, Gianfagna F, Blankenberg S, Njolstad I et al.; BiomarCaRE Consortium. Sex differences and similarities in atrial fibrillation epidemiology, risk factors, and mortality in community cohorts: results from the BiomarCaRE Consortium (Biomarker for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Europe). Circulation 2017;136:1588–97.
    1. Linde C, Bongiorni MG, Birgersdotter-Green U, Curtis AB, Deisenhofer I, Furokawa T et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. Sex differences in cardiac arrhythmia: a consensus document of the European Heart Rhythm Association, endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society. Europace 2018;20:1565.
    1. Chua W, Purmah Y, Cardoso VR, Gkoutos GV, Tull SP, Neculau G et al. Data-driven discovery and validation of circulating blood-based biomarkers associated with prevalent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2019;40:1268–1276.
    1. Dudink EA, Weijs B, Tull S, Luermans JG, Fabritz L, Chua W et al. The biomarkers NT-proBNP and CA-125 are elevated in patients with idiopathic atrial fibrillation. J Atr Fibrillation 2018;11:2058.
    1. De With RR, Marcos EG, Dudink EAMP, Spronk HM, Crijns HJGM, Rienstra M et al. Atrial fibrillation progression risk factors and associated cardiovascular outcome in well-phenotyped patients: data from the AF-RISK study. Europace 2020;22:352–360.
    1. De With RR, Erkuner O, Rienstra M, Nguyen BO, Korver FWJ, Linz D et al. Temporal patterns and short-term progression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: data from RACE V. Europace 2020;22:1162–72.
    1. Rienstra M, Hobbelt AH, Alings M, Tijssen JGP, Smit MD, Brügemann J et al.; for the RACE 3 Investigators. Targeted therapy of underlying conditions improves sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: results of the RACE 3 trial. Eur Heart J 2018;39:2987–2996.
    1. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J et al. STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:D447–52.
    1. Smedbakken L, Jensen JK, Hallén J, Atar D, Januzzi JL, Halvorsen B et al. Activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule and prognosis in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2011;42:2453–2458.
    1. Lim HE, Choi CU, Na JO, Choi JI, Kim SH, Kim JW et al. Effects of iatrogenic myocardial injury on coronary microvascular function in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2013;6:318–326.
    1. Goette A, Kalman JM, Aguinaga L, Akar J, Cabrera JA, Chen SA et al.; Document Reviewers. EHRA/HRS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus on atrial cardiomyopathies: definition, characterization, and clinical implication. Europace 2016;18:1455–1490.
    1. Egbuche O, Biggs ML, Ix JH, Kizer JR, Lyles MF, Siscovick DS et al. Fatty acid binding protein-4 and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:e014070.
    1. Rader F, Pujara AC, Pattakos G, Rajeswaran J, Li L, Castel L et al. Perioperative heart-type fatty acid binding protein levels in atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Heart Rhythm 2013;10:153–157.
    1. López-Canoa JN, Couselo-Seijas M, Baluja A, González-Melchor L, Rozados A, Llorente-Cortés V et al. Sex-related differences of fatty acid-binding protein 4 and leptin levels in atrial fibrillation. Europace 2020;23:682–90.
    1. Beyzade S, Zhang S, Wong YK, Day IN, Eriksson P, Ye S. Influences of matrix metalloproteinase-3 gene variation on extent of coronary atherosclerosis and risk of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:2130–2137.
    1. Galis ZS, Khatri JJ. Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling and atherogenesis: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Circ Res 2002;90:251–262.
    1. Yue L, Xie J, Nattel S. Molecular determinants of cardiac fibroblast electrical function and therapeutic implications for atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res 2011;89:744–753.
    1. Linssen PBC, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Schalkwijk CG, Beulens JWJ, Elders PJM, van der Heijden AA et al. Serum matrix metalloproteinases and left atrial remodeling—the Hoorn study. IJMS 2020;21:4944.
    1. Weijs B, Pisters R, Haest RJ, Kragten JA, Joosen IA, Versteylen M et al. Patients originally diagnosed with idiopathic atrial fibrillation more often suffer from insidious coronary artery disease compared to healthy sinus rhythm controls. Heart Rhythm 2012;9:1923–1929.
    1. Heeringa J, van der Kuip DA, Hofman A, Kors JA, van Rooij FJ, Lip GY et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis and risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:382–387.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться