The physical activity experience of prostate cancer patients: a multicentre peer motivation monitoring feasibility study. The Acti-Pair study

A Baudot, N Barth, C Colas, M Garros, A Garcin, M Oriol, F Roche, F Chauvin, N Mottet, D Hupin, on behalf the Acti-Pair investigators, A Baudot, N Barth, C Colas, M Garros, A Garcin, M Oriol, F Roche, F Chauvin, N Mottet, D Hupin, on behalf the Acti-Pair investigators

Abstract

Background: Although the benefits of physical activity (PA) on health are recognised, prostate cancer patients do not follow PA recommendations. The barriers to PA, whether physical, environmental or organisational, are known. Furthermore, even when such barriers are overcome, this achievement is not systematically accompanied by a change in lifestyle habits. The proposal of a programme enabling the integration of PA in the patient's everyday life represents a new challenge in the personalized management of cancer patients. Peer-mentoring interventions have demonstrated their effectiveness in increasing adherence to PA by patients. This study aimed (1) to assess the feasibility of a peer-mentoring intervention: the Acti-Pair program in a local context and (2) to assess the effectiveness of the intervention in this context.

Methods and analysis: A pre-post design pilot study will be used to evaluate feasibility, potential effectiveness and implementation outcomes overs in prostate cancer patients. We performed a mixed quantitative and qualitative prospective study to assess means and process indicators and the implementation of the Acti-Pair program. This study will be performed in cancer centres of Loire district and will be comprised of three successive stages (1) diagnosis of the target population, (2) recruitment and training of peers, and (3) implementation of this intervention in the Loire department.

Discussion: This study will allow us to extend the peer-mentoring intervention to other contexts and assess the effectiveness of this intervention and its generalisability.

Keywords: Accelerometry; Peer-mentoring; Physical activity; Population Health Intervention Research; Prostate cancer.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study progress
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Labelled sport-health structures mapping

References

    1. Defossez G, Le G-p S, Bouvier A. Estimation s Nationale s de l ’ Incidence et de La Mortalité Par Cancer En France Métropolitaine Entre 1990 et. 2018.
    1. Mishra SI, Scherer RW, Snyder C, Geigle PM, Berlanstein DR, Topaloglu O. Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for people with cancer during active treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(8). 10.1002/14651858.CD008465.pub2.
    1. Stout NL, Baima J, Swisher AK, Winters-Stone KM, Welsh J. A systematic review of exercise systematic reviews in the cancer literature (2005-2017) PM R. 2017;9(9):S347–S384. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.07.074.
    1. Bonn SE, Sjolander A, Lagerros YT, et al. Physical activity and survival among men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015;24(1):57–64. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0707.
    1. Richman EL, Kenfield SA, Stampfer MJ, Paciorek A, Carroll PR, Chan JM. Physical activity after diagnosis and risk of prostate cancer progression: data from the cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor. Cancer Res. 2011;71(11):3889–3895. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3932.
    1. Chan JM, Van Blarigan EL, Kenfield SA. What should we tell prostate cancer patients about (secondary) prevention? Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24(3):318–323. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000049.
    1. Hupin D, Roche F, Gremeaux V, et al. Even a low-dose of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity reduces mortality by 22% in adults aged ≥60 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(19):1262–1267. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094306.
    1. Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, et al. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(2):123. doi: 10.7326/M14-1651.
    1. Ministère du Travail de l’Emploi et de la Santé. Programme national nutrition santé 2011-2015. 2015;13(3):1576–80. .
    1. Ministère des solidarités et de la santé . Stratégie nationale de santé 2018-2022. 2018. pp. 1–11.
    1. French national cancer institute (Institut national du cancer). Plan cancer 2014-2019. .
    1. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54:1451–62. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955.
    1. Blanchard CM, Stein KD, Baker F, et al. Association between current lifestyle behaviors and health-related quality of life in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer survivors. Psychol Health. 2004;19(1):1–13. doi: 10.1080/08870440310001606507.
    1. Coups E, Ostroff J. A population-based estimate of the prevalence of behavioral risk factors among adult cancer survivors and noncancer controls. Prev Med (Baltim). 2005;40(6):702–711. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.011.
    1. Craike MJ, Livingston PM, Botti M. An exploratory study of the factors that influence physical activity for prostate cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(7):1019–1028. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0929-3.
    1. Ottenbacher AJ, Day RS, Taylor WC, et al. Exercise among breast and prostate cancer survivors—what are their barriers? J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5(4):413–419. doi: 10.1007/s11764-011-0184-8.
    1. Milne HM, Wallman KE, Guilfoyle A, Gordon S, Courneya KS. Self-determination theory and physical activity among breast cancer survivors. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016;30(1):23–38. doi: 10.1123/jsep.30.1.23.
    1. Kampshoff CS, Jansen F, van Mechelen W, May AM, MJC JB, LMB Determinants of exercise adherence and maintenance among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(1):80. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-80.
    1. Jones LW, Courneya KS, Fairey AS, Mackey JR. Effects of an oncologist’s recommendation to exercise on self-reported exercise behavior in newly diagnosed breast cancer survivors: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2004;28(2):105–113. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2802_5.
    1. Rabin C, Simpson N, Morrow K, Pinto B. Intervention format and delivery preferences among young adult cancer survivors. Int J Behav Med. 2013;20(2):304–310. doi: 10.1007/s12529-012-9227-4.
    1. Hefferon K, Murphy H, McLeod J, Mutrie N, Campbell A. Understanding barriers to exercise implementation 5-year post-breast cancer diagnosis: a large-scale qualitative study. Health Educ Res. 2013;28(5):843–856. doi: 10.1093/her/cyt083.
    1. Ormel HL, van der Schoot GGF, Sluiter WJ, Jalving M, Gietema JA, Walenkamp AME. Predictors of adherence to exercise interventions during and after cancer treatment: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2018;27(3):713–724. doi: 10.1002/pon.4612.
    1. Turner RR, Steed L, Quirk H, Greasley RU, Saxton JM, Taylor SJC, et al. Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer ( Review ). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(9) A (9). 10.1002/.
    1. Ginis KAM, Nigg CR, Smith AL. Peer-delivered physical activity interventions: an overlooked opportunity for physical activity promotion. Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(4):434–443. doi: 10.1007/s13142-013-0215-2.
    1. Trinh L, Mutrie N, Campbell AM, Crawford JJ, Courneya KS. Effects of supervised exercise on motivational outcomes in breast cancer survivors at 5-year follow-up. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(6):557–563. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.07.004.
    1. Wurz A, St-Aubin A, Brunet J. Breast cancer survivors’ barriers and motives for participating in a group-based physical activity program offered in the community. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(8):2407–2416. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2596-2.
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Lauzon N, Myers AM, et al. Effectiveness of the First step Program delivered by professionals versus peers. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(4):456–462. doi: 10.1123/jpah.6.4.456.
    1. Buman MP, Giacobbi PR, Dzierzewski JM, et al. Peer volunteers improve long-term maintenance of physical activity with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Phys Act Heal. 2011;8(s2):S257–S266. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.s2.s257.
    1. Castro CM, Pruitt LA, Buman MP, King AC. Physical activity program delivery by professionals versus volunteers: the TEAM randomized trial. Heal Psychol. 2011;30(3):285–294. doi: 10.1037/a0021980.
    1. Pinto BM, Frierson GM, Rabin C, Trunzo JJ, Marcus BH. Home-based physical activity intervention for breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3577–3587. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.080.
    1. Pinto BM, Stein K, Dunsiger S. Peers promoting physical activity among breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Heal Psychol. 2015;34(5):463–472. doi: 10.1037/hea0000120.
    1. Galvão DA, Newton RU, Girgis A, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a peer led multimodal intervention for men with prostate cancer to increase exercise participation. Psychooncology. 2018;27(1):199–207. doi: 10.1002/pon.4495.
    1. Blaney JM, Lowe-Strong A, Rankin-Watt J, Campbell A, Gracey JH. Cancer survivors’ exercise barriers, facilitators and preferences in the context of fatigue, quality of life and physical activity participation: a questionnaire-survey. Psychooncology. 2013;22(1):186–194. doi: 10.1002/pon.2072.
    1. French national cancer institute (Institut national du cancer). Bénéfices de l'activité physique pendant et après cancer, des connaissances scientifiques au repères pratiques. 2017. .
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–207. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
    1. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. 2001. pp. 307–312.
    1. Markland D, Tobin V. A modification to the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2004;26(2):191–196. doi: 10.1123/jsep.26.2.191.
    1. Tilley RP& N . Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States. SAGE Publications, Inc; 1997. An Introduction to Scientific Realist Evaluation; pp. 1–36.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться