A 12-Week Electronic Mentoring Employment Preparation Intervention for Youth With Physical Disabilities: Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

Sally Lindsay, Elaine Cagliostro, Joanne Leck, Jennifer Stinson, Sally Lindsay, Elaine Cagliostro, Joanne Leck, Jennifer Stinson

Abstract

Background: Youth with disabilities are at high risk of unemployment compared with youth without disabilities. They often encounter challenges in accessing vocational programs that meet their needs. One promising approach that could help to address barriers that youth encounter while also enhancing social support is through electronic mentoring (e-mentoring). Although there is an increase in e-mentoring for youth with disabilities, little is known about its impact for youth with physical disabilities.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the acceptability and initial impact of a Web-based peer electronic mentor employment intervention for youth with physical disabilities.

Methods: The Empowering Youth Towards Employment intervention was evaluated using a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT). Youth, aged 15-21 years, with physical disabilities were randomly assigned to an intervention (ie, mentored) or control (ie, not mentored) group. Trained mentors (ie, near peers) with a physical disability led the online discussion forums and provided peer support and resources for 12 modules (1 topic per week over 12 weeks). Primary outcomes focused on self-determination, career maturity, and social support. We also explored program adherence and dosage, participant satisfaction, and areas for improvement.

Results: A total of 13 youth (mean age 17.3 years, SD 1.88; 54%, 7/13 female) completed the RCT. In the intervention group (n=9), 56% (5/9) of the youth were females, and in the control group (n=4), 50% (2/4) of the youth were female. Participants reported satisfaction with the program and that it was feasible and acceptable. Participants' mean engagement level with the program was 5.22 (SD 2.48) for the intervention group and 5.40 (SD 4.56) for controls. Participants in the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in self-determination (t12=2.49; P<.04) compared with the control group. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: The Empowering Youth Towards Employment is a promising intervention that enhances self-determination among youth with physical disabilities.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02522507; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02522507 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6uD58Pvjc).

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/resprot.8034.

Keywords: disabled persons; employment; mentor; occupational therapy; rehabilitation; social support; youth.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Sally Lindsay, Elaine Cagliostro, Joanne Leck, Jennifer Stinson. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (http://pediatrics.jmir.org), 29.03.2019.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search process flow diagram.

References

    1. Lindsay S. Discrimination and other barriers to employment for teens and young adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15-16):1340–50. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.531372.
    1. Till M. Canadian Survey on Disability. 2012. A profile of the labour market experiences of adults with disabilities among Canadians aged 15 years and older .
    1. Carter EW, Trainor AA, Ditchman N, Swedeen B, Owens L. Community-based summer work experiences of adolescents with high-incidence disabilities. J Spec Educ. 2009 Nov 13;45(2):89–103. doi: 10.1177/0022466909353204.
    1. Trainor AA, Lindstrom L, Simon-Burroughs M, Martin JE, Sorrells AM. From marginalized to maximized opportunities for diverse youths with disabilities: a position paper of the Division on Career Development and Transition. Career Dev Transition Except Individ. 2008 Apr 22;31(1):56–64. doi: 10.1177/0885728807313777.
    1. Hanif S, Peters H, McDougall C, Lindsay S. A systematic review of vocational interventions for youth with disabilities. In: Altman BM, editor. Factors in Studying Employment for Persons with Disability. Bingley, West Yorkshire, England: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2017. pp. 181–202.
    1. Lindsay S, Stinson J, Stergiou-Kita M, Leck J. Improving transition to employment for youth with physical disabilities: protocol for a peer electronic mentoring intervention. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Nov 16;6(11):e215. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8034.
    1. Lindsay S, Adams T, McDougall C, Sanford R. Skill development in an employment-training program for adolescents with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(3):228–37. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.603015. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.603015.
    1. Barnfather A, Stewart M, Magill-Evans J, Ray L, Letourneau N. Computer-mediated support for adolescents with cerebral palsy or spina bifida. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011;29(1):24–33; quiz 34. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f9db63. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f9db63.
    1. Arnett J. Emerging adulthood: what is it, and what is it good for? Child Dev Perspect. 2007;1(2):68–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00016.x.
    1. Stumbo NJ. Evidence-based practices in mentoring students with disabilities: four case studies. JSESD. 2009 Nov 01;14(1):33–54. doi: 10.14448/jsesd.03.0003.
    1. Karcher MJ, Kuperminc GP, Portwood SG, Sipe CL, Taylor AS. Mentoring programs: a framework to inform program development, research, and evaluation. J Community Psychol. 2006 Nov;34(6):709–725. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20125.
    1. Stinson JN, McGrath PJ, Hodnett ED, Feldman BM, Duffy CM, Huber AM, Tucker LB, Hetherington CR, Tse SM, Spiegel LR, Campillo S, Gill NK, White ME. An internet-based self-management program with telephone support for adolescents with arthritis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol. 2010 Sep;37(9):1944–52. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.091327.
    1. Fraas M, Bellerose A. Mentoring programme for adolescent survivors of acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2010 Jan;24(1):50–61. doi: 10.3109/02699050903446781.
    1. Funnell MM. Peer-based behavioural strategies to improve chronic disease self-management and clinical outcomes: evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations and needs for future research. Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27(Suppl 1):i17–22. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp027.
    1. Lindsay S, Fellin M. A systematic review of mentorship programs to facilitate transition to post-secondary education and employment for youth and young adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Jul;38(14):1329–49. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1092174. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1092174.
    1. Campbell-Whatley GD. Mentoring students with mild disabilities: the "nuts and bolts" of program development. ISC. 2001 Mar 01;36(4):211–216. doi: 10.1177/105345120103600403.
    1. Shem K, Medel R, Wright J, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Duong T. Return to work and school: a model mentoring program for youth and young adults with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011 Apr;49(4):544–8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.166.
    1. Sword C, Hill K. National Center on Secondary Education and Transition. [2019-02-22]. Creating mentoring opportunities for youth with disabilities: Issues and suggested strategies .
    1. Lindsay S, Munson M. National Mentoring Resource Center. 2018. Mentoring For Youth With Disabilities .
    1. DuBois DL, Holloway BE, Valentine JC, Cooper H. Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: a meta-analytic review. Am J Community Psychol. 2002 Apr;30(2):157–97. doi: 10.1023/A:1014628810714. doi: 10.1023/A:1014628810714.
    1. Powers L, Sowers J, Stevens T. An exploratory randomized study of the impact of mentoring on the self-efficacy and community-based knowledge of adolescents with severe physical challenges. J Rehabil Med. 1995;61(1):33–41.
    1. Southwick SM, Morgan CA, Vythilingam M, Charney D. Mentors enhance resilience in at-risk children and adolescents. Psychoanal Inq. 2007 Apr 12;26(4):577–584. doi: 10.1080/07351690701310631.
    1. Lindstrom L, Doren B, Post C, Lombardi A. Building career PATHS (postschool achievement through higher skills) for young women with disabilities. CDQ. 2013 Dec 09;61(4):330–338. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2013.00059.x.
    1. Elliott C, Leck J. Shattering glass: e-mentoring and the advancement of diversity. Int J Organiz Diverse. 2016;16(4):1–15. doi: 10.18848/2328-6261/CGP/v16i04/1-15.
    1. Lindsay S, Smith S, Bell F, Bellaby P. Tackling the digital divide: exploring the impact of ICT on managing heart conditions in a deprived area. Inf Commun Soc. 2007 Feb;10(1):95–114. doi: 10.1080/13691180701193127.
    1. Nguyen HQ, Carrieri-Kohlman V, Rankin SH, Slaughter R, Stulbarg MS. Internet-based patient education and support interventions: a review of evaluation studies and directions for future research. Comput Biol Med. 2004 Mar;34(2):95–112. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4825(03)00046-5. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4825(03)00046-5.
    1. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesakis M, Rizo C, Stern A. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. Br Med J. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1166. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166.
    1. Lenhart A. Pew Research Center. 2015. [2019-01-18]. A majority of American teens report access to a computer, game console, smart phone and a tablet .
    1. Thompson L, Jeffries M, Topping K. E‐mentoring for e‐learning development. IETI. 2010 Aug;47(3):305–315. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2010.498182.
    1. Lindsay S, McPherson AC. Experiences of social exclusion and bullying at school among children and youth with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(2):101–9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.587086. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.587086.
    1. Ohler J, Levinson E, Barker W. Career maturity in college students with learning disabilities. CDQ. 1996;44(3) doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.1996.tb00259.x.
    1. Field S, Sarver MD, Shaw SF. Self-determination: a key to success in postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities. Remedial Spec Educ. 2016 Aug 18;24(6):339–349. doi: 10.1177/07419325030240060501.
    1. Super D, Savickas M, Super C. A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In: Brown D, Brooks L, editors. Career choice and development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996.
    1. Fabian ES. Urban youth with disabilities: factors affecting transition employment. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2016 Aug 13;50(3):130–138. doi: 10.1177/00343552070500030101.
    1. Plano Clark VL, Schumacher K, West C, Edrington J, Dunn LB, Harzstark A, Melisko M, Rabow MW, Swift PS, Miaskowski C. Practices for embedding an interpretive qualitative approach within a randomized clinical trial. J Mix Methods Res. 2013 Jul;7(3):219–242. doi: 10.1177/1558689812474372.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J. 2008;337:a1655.
    1. Lindsay S, Goodfellow A, Stergiou-Kita M, Kirsh B, Lero D. Physical Disabilities: Perspectives, Risk Factors and Quality of Life. New York: Nova Science publishers; 2017. Inclusionary business practices for recruiting and retaining people with disabilities.
    1. Leck J, Elliott C, Bourgeois E, Kemp K. Knowledge Synthesis Grant Final Report. 2014. [2019-02-24]. Mentoring a Diverse Workforce .
    1. Lindsay S, McDougall C, Menna-Dack D, Sanford R, Adams T. An ecological approach to understanding barriers to employment for youth with disabilities compared to their typically developing peers: views of youth, employers, and job counselors. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):701–11. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.939775. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.939775.
    1. Hsu L. Random assignment procedures. In: Nezu A, Nezu C, editors. Evidence-based outcome research: A practical guide to conducting randomized controlled trials for psychosocial interventions. New York: Oxford; 2008.
    1. Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital. 2018. Youth mentorship program .
    1. World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2015. [2019-01-18]. Disabilities
    1. Adelstein DM, Webster DW. Cross-sectional, longitudinal and composite longitudinal data on the Career Maturity Inventory Attitude Scale. J Vocat Behav. 1979 Feb;14(1):102–111. doi: 10.1016/0001-8791(79)90052-6.
    1. Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1990;55(3-4):610–7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095.
    1. Crites JO, Savickas ML. Revision of the career maturity inventory. J Career Assess. 2016 Jul 25;4(2):131–138. doi: 10.1177/106907279600400202.
    1. Shogren KA, Wehmeyer ML, Palmer SB, Soukup JH, Little TD, Garner N, Lawrence M. Understanding the construct of self-determination: examining the relationship between the Arc's Self-Determination Scale and the American Institutes for Research Self-Determination Scale. Assess Eff Interv. 2008 Mar;33(2):94–107. doi: 10.1177/1534508407311395.
    1. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988 Mar;52(1):30–41. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Lindsay S, McDougall C, Sanford R, Menna-Dack D, Kingsnorth S, Adams T. Exploring employment readiness through mock job interview and workplace role-play exercises: comparing youth with physical disabilities to their typically developing peers. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(18):1651–63. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.973968.
    1. Bierema L, Merriam S. E-mentoring: using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovat High Educ. 2002;26(3):211–27. doi: 10.1023/A:1017921023103.
    1. Dennis C. Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Mar;40(3):321–32.
    1. Ahola KS, Stinson JN, Ruskin D, Forgeron P, Harris L, van Wyk M, Luca S, Campbell F. iPeer2Peer program: a pilot feasibility study in adolescents with chronic pain. Pain. 2016 May;157(5):1146–55. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000496.
    1. Shpigelman C-N, Weiss PL, Reiter S. E-mentoring for all. Comput Human Behav. 2009 Jul;25(4):919–928. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.007.
    1. Ammerlaan J, van Os-Mendendorp H, de Boer-Nijhof N, Scholtus L, Kruize AA, van Pelt P, Prakken B, Bijlsma H. Short term effectiveness and experiences of a peer guided web-based self-management intervention for young adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2017 Oct 13;15(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12969-017-0201-1.
    1. Gregg N, Galyardt A, Wolfe G, Moon N, Todd R. Virtual mentoring and persistence in STEM for students with disabilities. Career Dev Transit Except Individ. 2016 May 25;40(4):205–214. doi: 10.1177/2165143416651717.
    1. Gregg N, Wolfe G, Jones S, Todd R, Moon N, Langston C. STEM e-mentoring and community college students with disabilities. JPED. 2016;29(1):47–63.
    1. Stewart M, Barnfather A, Magill-Evans J, Ray L, Letourneau N. Brief report: an online support intervention: perceptions of adolescents with physical disabilities. J Adolesc. 2011 Aug;34(4):795–800. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.04.007.
    1. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychol. 2008;49(3):182–185. doi: 10.1037/a0012801.
    1. Eisenman LT. Self-determination interventions: building a foundation for school completion. Remedial Spec Educ. 2016 Aug 18;28(1):2–8. doi: 10.1177/07419325070280010101.
    1. Mumbardó-Adam C, Shogren KA, Guàrdia-olmos J, Giné C. Contextual predictors of self-determined actions in students with and without intellectual disability. Psychol Schs. 2016 Dec 27;54(2):183–195. doi: 10.1002/pits.21987.
    1. Bell EC. Mentoring transition-age youth with blindness. J Spec Educ. 2010 Jun 25;46(3):170–179. doi: 10.1177/0022466910374211.
    1. Kim K, Choi H. The influence of e-mentoring with college students with disabilities on career decision self-efficacy and college preparation for high school students with disabilities. Korean J Special Edu. 2017 Sep 30;52(2):149–169. doi: 10.15861/kjse.2017.52.2.149.
    1. Smedley M, Levinson E, Barker W, DeAngelis D. Differences in career maturity among adjudicated and non adjudicated male students with and without disabilities. J Employ Couns. 2003;40:108–22. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1920.2003.tb00861.x.
    1. Rhodes JE, Grossman JB, Resch NL. Agents of change: pathways through which mentoring relationships influence adolescents' academic adjustment. Child Dev. 2000;71(6):1662–71.
    1. Shpigelman C, Gill CJ. The characteristics of unsuccessful e-mentoring relationships for youth with disabilities. Qual Health Res. 2013 Apr;23(4):463–75. doi: 10.1177/1049732312469115.
    1. Francis G, Gross J, Turnbull A, Turnbull R. The family employment awareness training (FEAT): a mixed-method follow-up. J Vocat Rehabil. 2013;39(3):167–81. doi: 10.3233/JVR-130652.
    1. Luecking R, Wittenburg D. Providing supports to youth with disabilities transitioning to adulthood: case descriptions from the Youth Transition Demonstration. J Vocat Rehabil. 2009;30(3):241–51. doi: 10.3233/JVR-2009-0464.
    1. Kasprisin CA, Single PB, Single RM, Muller CB. Building a better bridge: testing e-training to improve e-mentoring programmes in higher education. Mentor Tutor Partner Learn. 2003 Apr;11(1):67–78. doi: 10.1080/1361126032000054817.
    1. Kramer JM, Ryan CT, Moore R, Schwartz A. Feasibility of electronic peer mentoring for transition-age youth and young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: project teens making environment and activity modifications. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31(1):e118–e129. doi: 10.1111/jar.12346.
    1. DiRenzo MS, Linnehan F, Shao P, Rosenberg WL. A moderated mediation model of e-mentoring. J Vocat Behav. 2010 Apr;76(2):292–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.003.
    1. Deutsch NL, Spencer R. Capturing the magic: assessing the quality of youth mentoring relationships. New Dir Youth Dev. 2009;2009(121):47–70. doi: 10.1002/yd.296.
    1. Wierenga D, Engbers LH, Van Empelen P, Duijts S, Hildebrandt VH, Van Mechelen W. What is actually measured in process evaluations for worksite health promotion programs: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1190. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1190.

Source: PubMed

Спонсоры и соавторы

Заболевания

Медикаментозные вмешательства

Подписаться