Digital detection of dementia (D3): a study protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial examining the application of patient-reported outcomes and passive clinical decision support systems

Michael J Kleiman, Abbi D Plewes, Arthur Owora, Randall W Grout, Paul Richard Dexter, Nicole R Fowler, James E Galvin, Zina Ben Miled, Malaz Boustani, Michael J Kleiman, Abbi D Plewes, Arthur Owora, Randall W Grout, Paul Richard Dexter, Nicole R Fowler, James E Galvin, Zina Ben Miled, Malaz Boustani

Abstract

Background: Early detection of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) in a primary care setting is challenging due to time constraints and stigma. The implementation of scalable, sustainable, and patient-driven processes may improve early detection of ADRD; however, there are competing approaches; information may be obtained either directly from a patient (e.g., through a questionnaire) or passively using electronic health record (EHR) data. In this study, we aim to identify the benefit of a combined approach using a pragmatic cluster-randomized clinical trial.

Methods: We have developed a Passive Digital Marker (PDM), based on machine learning algorithms applied to EHR data, and paired it with a patient-reported outcome (the Quick Dementia Rating Scale or QDRS) to rapidly share an identified risk of impairment to a patient's physician. Clinics in both south Florida and Indiana will be randomly assigned to one of three study arms: 1200 patients in each of the two populations will be administered either the PDM, the PDM with the QDRS, or neither, for a total of 7200 patients across all clinics and populations. Both incidence of ADRD diagnosis and acceptance into ADRD diagnostic work-up regimens is hypothesized to increase when patients are administered both the PDM and QDRS. Physicians performing the work-up regimens will be blind to the study arm of the patient.

Discussion: This study aims to test the accuracy and effectiveness of the two scalable approaches (PDM and QDRS) for the early detection of ADRD among older adults attending primary care practices. The data obtained in this study may lead to national early detection and management program for ADRD as an efficient and beneficial method of reducing the current and future burden of ADRD, as well as improving the annual rate of newly documented ADRD in primary care practices.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05231954 . Registered February 9, 2022.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias; Clinical decision support; Electronic health records; Machine learning; Patient reported outcome.

Conflict of interest statement

RWG has received unrelated institutional grant funding from Pfizer. No other authors have anything to disclose. The NIH had no input on the design of the study or the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Our two trials are highly pragmatic as indicated by scores of 4 and 5 (‘most pragmatic’) in the PRECIS-2 summary wheel depicted here. The diverse primary care settings, minimal inclusion/exclusion criteria, highly relevant clinical outcomes to patients and providers, close EHR-based data follow-up, and expertise in developing scalable low-cost cognitive assessments results in a very pragmatic design. We have strong partnerships with local primary care clinics. Patient input was received in designing QDRS and study flow. Other pragmatic elements include not asking clinicians to deny patients any routine procedures such as cognitive tests and using a variety of patient identification methods

References

    1. Alzheimer’s Association 2018 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2018;14(3):367–429.
    1. Cordell CB, Borson S, Boustani M, et al. Alzheimer’s Association recommendations for operationalizing the detection of cognitive impairment during the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit in a primary care setting. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:141–150.
    1. Holsinger T, Deveau J, Boustani M, Williams JW. Does this patient have dementia? JAMA. 2007;297(21):2391–2404.
    1. Bradford A, Kunik ME, Schulz P, Williams SP, Singh H. Missed and delayed diagnosis of dementia in primary care: prevalence and contributing factors. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009;23:306–314.
    1. Lin JS, O’Connor E, Rossom RC, Perdue LA, Eckstrom E. Screening for cognitive impairment in older adults: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:601–612.
    1. Boise L, Camicioli R, Morgan DL, Rose JH, Congleton L. Diagnosing dementia: perspectives of primary care physicians. Gerontologist. 1999;39:457–464.
    1. Brayne C, Fox C, Boustani M. Dementia screening in primary care: is it time? JAMA. 2007;298:2409–2411.
    1. Iliffe S, Haines A, Gallivan S, Booroff A, Goldenberg E, Morgan P. Assessment of elderly people in general practice. 1. Social circumstances and mental state. B J Gen Pract. 1991;41(342):9–12.
    1. McCormick WC, Kukull WA, van Belle G, Bowen JD, Teri L, Larson EB. Symptom patterns and comorbidity in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:517–521.
    1. Hurd MD, Martorell P, Delavande A, Mullen KJ, Langa KM. Monetary costs of dementia in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(14):1326–1334.
    1. Ashford JW, Borson S, O’Hara R, et al. Should older adults be screened for dementia? It is important to screen for evidence of dementia! Alzheimers Dement. 2007;3:75–80.
    1. Philpis E, Walters A, Biju M, Kuruvilla T. Population-based screening for dementia: controversy and current status. Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry. 2016;6–10.
    1. Galvin JE. Using informant and performance screening methods to detect mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Curr Geriatr Rep. 2018;7(1):19–25.
    1. Boustani M, Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, et al. Implementing a screening and diagnosis program for dementia in primary care. JGIM. 2005;20(7):572–577.
    1. Fowler NR, Perkins AJ, Gao S, Sachs GA, Boustani MA. Risks and benefits of screening for dementia in primary care: the Indiana University cognitive health outcomes investigation of the comparative effectiveness of dementia screening (IU CHOICE) trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(3):535–543.
    1. Fowler NR, Perkins AJ, Turchan HA, et al. Older primary care patients’ attitudes and willingness to screen for dementia. J Aging Res. 2015;2015:423265.
    1. Harrawood A, Fowler NR, Perkins AJ, LaMantia MA, Boustani MA. Acceptability and results of dementia screening among older adults in the United States. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018;15(1):51–55.
    1. Fowler NR, Perkins AJ, Gao S, Sachs GA, Uebelhor AK, Boustani MA. Patient characteristics associated with screening positive for Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:1779–1785.
    1. Boustani MA, Justiss MD, Frame A, et al. Caregiver and noncaregiver attitudes toward dementia screening. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(4):681–686.
    1. Fowler NR, Boustani MA, Frame A, et al. Effect of patient perceptions on dementia screening in primary care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(6):1037–1043.
    1. Justiss MD, Boustani M, Fox C, et al. Patients’ attitudes of dementia screening across the Atlantic. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24(6):632–637.
    1. Miled ZB, Haas K, Black CM, Khandker RK, Chandrasekaran V, Lipton R, Boustani MA. Predicting dementia with routine care EMR data. Artif Intell Med. 2020;1(102):101771.
    1. Galvin JE. The Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS): a rapid dementia staging tool. Alzheimer’s Dement Diagn Assess Dis Monit. 2015;1(2):249–259.
    1. Monahan PO, Alder CA, Khan BA, Stump T, Boustani MA. The Healthy Aging Brain Care (HABC) Monitor: validation of the Patient Self-Report Version of the clinical tool designed to measure and monitor cognitive, functional, and psychological health. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:2123.
    1. Galvin JE, Roe CM, Powlishta KK, et al. The AD8: a brief informant interview to detect dementia. Neurology. 2005;65:559–594.
    1. Galvin JE, Roe CM, Xiong C, Morris JC. The validity and reliability of the AD8 informant interview for dementia. Neurology. 2006;67:1942–1948.
    1. Berman SE, Koscik RL, Clark LR, Mueller KD, Bluder L, Galvin JE, Johnson SC. Use of the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS) as an initial screening measure in a longitudinal cohort at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease reports. 2017;1(1):9–13.
    1. Boustani M, Yourman L, Holden RJ, Pang PS, Solid CA. A profile in population health management: the Sandra Eskenazi Center for Brain Care Innovation. 2019.
    1. Holden RJ, Campbell NL, Abebe E, Clark DO, Ferguson D, Bodke K, Boustani MA, Callahan CM. Usability and feasibility of consumer-facing technology to reduce unsafe medication use by older adults. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020;16(1):54–61.
    1. Khan BA, Perkins AJ, Campbell NL, Gao S, Farber MO, Wang S, Khan SH, Zarzaur BL, Boustani MA. Pharmacological management of delirium in the intensive care unit: a randomized pragmatic clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(5):1057–1065.
    1. Campbell NL, Perkins AJ, Khan BA, Gao S, Farber MO, Khan S, Wang S, Boustani MA. Deprescribing in the pharmacologic management of delirium: a randomized trial in the intensive care unit. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(4):695–702.
    1. LaMantia MA, Perkins AJ, Gao S, Austrom MG, Alder CA, French DD, Litzelman DK, Cottingham AH, Boustani MA. Response to depression treatment in the Aging Brain Care Medical Home model. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1551–1558.
    1. LaMantia MA, Alder CA, Callahan CM, Gao S, French DD, Austrom MG, Boustany K, Livin L, Bynagari B, Boustani MA. The aging brain care medical home: Preliminary data. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(6):1209–1213.
    1. Khan BA, Calvo-Ayala E, Campbell N, Perkins A, Ionescu R, Tricker J, Campbell T, Zawahiri M, Buckley JD, Farber MO, Boustani MA. Clinical decision support system and incidence of delirium in cognitively impaired older adults transferred to intensive care. Am J Crit Care. 2013;22(3):257–262.
    1. Frame A, LaMantia M, Reddy Bynagari BB, Dexter P, Boustani M. Development and implementation of an electronic decision support to manage the health of a high-risk population: the enhanced Electronic Medical Record Aging Brain Care software (eMR-ABC) EGEMS (Washington, DC) 2013;1(1):1009.
    1. Boustani MA, Campbell NL, Khan BA, et al. Enhancing care for hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. JGIM. 2012;27(5):561–567.
    1. Kasthurirathne SN, Vest J, Menachemi N, Halverson PK, Grannis SJ. Assessing the capacity of social determinants of health data to augment predictive models identifying patients in need of wraparound social services. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2018;25(1). 10.1093/jamia/ocx130
    1. Haas LR, Takahashi PY, Shah ND, Stroebel RJ, Bernard ME, Finnie DM, Naessens JM. Risk-stratification methods for identifying patients for care coordination. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(9):725–732.
    1. Vest JR, Menachemi N, Grannis SJ, Ferrell JL, Kasthurirathne SN, Zhang Y, Tong Y, Halverson PK. Impact of risk stratification on referrals and uptake of wraparound services that address social determinants: a stepped wedged trial. Am J Prev Med. 2019;56(4):e125–e133.
    1. Fowler NR, Campbell NL, Pohl GM, Munsie LM, Kirson NY, Desai U, Trieschman EJ, Meiselbach MK, Andrews JS, Boustani MA. One-year effect of the Medicare annual wellness visit on detection of cognitive impairment: a cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(5):969–975.
    1. Miotto R, Li L, Kidd BA, Dudley JT. Deep patient: an unsupervised representation to predict the future of patients from the electronic health records. Sci Rep. 2016;17(6):2609.
    1. Reuben DB, Hackbarth AS, Wenger NS, Tan ZS, Jennings LA. An automated approach to identifying patients with dementia using electronic medical records. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65(3):658–659.
    1. Jammeh EA, Carroll CB, Pearson SW, et al. Machine-learning based identification of undiagnosed dementia in primary care: a feasibility study. BJGP Open. 2018;2(2):bjgopen18X101589.
    1. Amra S, O’Horo JC, Singh TD, et al. Derivation and validation of the automated search algorithms to identify cognitive impairment and dementia in electronic health records. J Crit Care. 2017;37:202–205.
    1. Maity NG, Das S. Machine learning for improved diagnosis and prognosis in healthcare. In2017 ieee aerospace conference 2017 Mar 4 (pp. 1–9). IEEE.
    1. Holmes MM, Stanescu S, Bishop FL. The use of measurement systems to support patient self-management of long term conditions: an overview opportunities and challenges. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019;16(10):385–394.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться