Comparison of loss of resistance technique between Epidrum® and conventional method for identifying the epidural space

Seon Wook Kim, Young Mi Kim, Soo Hwan Kim, Mi Hwa Chung, Young Ryong Choi, Eun Mi Choi, Seon Wook Kim, Young Mi Kim, Soo Hwan Kim, Mi Hwa Chung, Young Ryong Choi, Eun Mi Choi

Abstract

Background: Epidrum® is a recently developed, air operated, loss of resistance (LOR) device for identifying the epidural space. We investigated the usefulness of Epidrum® by comparing it with the conventional LOR technique for identifying the epidural space.

Methods: One hundred eight American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II patients between the ages of 17 and 68 years old and who were scheduled for elective surgery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized into two groups: one group received epidural anesthesia by the conventional LOR technique (C group) and the second group received epidural anesthesia using Epidrum® (ED group). While performing epidural anesthesia, the values of variables were recorded, including the number of failures, more than 2 attempts, the incidence of dural puncture, the time needed to locate the epidural space, the distance from the skin to the epidural space and ease of performance, and the satisfaction scores.

Results: The ED group showed a lower failure rate, fewer cases of more than 2 attempts, a lesser time to identify the epidural space, and better ease and satisfaction scores of procedure than the C group, with statistical significance.

Conclusions: Using Epidrum® compared to the conventional LOR technique is an easy, rapid, and reliable method for identifying the epidural space.

Keywords: Epidrum®; Epidural anesthesia; Loss of resistance.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Epidrum® is 2.5 × 2 cm in size and consists of a hard plastic body chamber, an injection port with a one way valve (right side), an outlet port to connect to the epidural needle (left side), and a soft, thin silicon membrane diaphragm on top of the device.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The injection port connected to the syringe has a one way valve. When air is injected by the connected syringe, the silicon membrane diaphragm assumes the inflated position if the epidural needle end through the outlet port on either end is plugged.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
When the epidural needle tip penetrates the ligamentum flavum into the epidural space, the diaphragm assumes the deflated position because of decreased intra-chamber pressure through the epidural space.

References

    1. Ranasinghe JS, Birnbach DJ. Progress in analgesia for labor: focus on neuraxial blocks. Int J Womens Health. 2010;1:31–43.
    1. Grass JA. The role of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in postoperative outcome. Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2000;18:407–428. viii.
    1. Vanterpool S, Coombs R, Fecho K. Continuous epidural infusion of morphine versus single epidural injection of extended-release morphine for postoperative pain control after arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2010;6:271–277.
    1. Howell TK, Prosser DP, Harmer M. A change in resistance? A survey of epidural practice amongst obstetric anaesthetists. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:238–243.
    1. Grondin LS, Nelson K, Ross V, Aponte O, Lee S, Pan PH. Success of spinal and epidural labor analgesia comparison of loss of resistance technique using air versus saline in combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia technique. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:165–172.
    1. Segal S, Arendt KW. A retrospective effectiveness study of loss of resistance to air or saline for identification of the epidural space. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:558–563.
    1. Stojanovic MP, Vu TN, Caneris O, Slezak J, Cohen SP, Sang CN. The role of fluoroscopy in cervical epidural steroid injections : an analysis of contrast dispersal patterns. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:509–514.
    1. Pan PH, Bogard TD, Owen MD. Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2004;13:227–233.
    1. Eappen S, Blinn A, Segal S. Incidence of epidural catheter replacement in parturients: a retrospective chart review. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998;7:220–225.
    1. Faitot V, Ourchane R, Dahmani S, Magheru M, Nebout S, Gomas F, et al. An observational study of factors leading to difficulty in resident anaesthesiologists identifying the epidural space in obstetric patients. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20:124–127.
    1. Harrison GR. Topographical anatomy of the lumbar epidural region: an in vivo study using computerized axial tomography. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:229–234.
    1. Morgan BM, Magni V, Goroszenuik T. Anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:420–424.
    1. Portnoy D, Vadhera RB. Mechanisms and management of an incomplete epidural block for cesarean section. Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2003;21:39–57.
    1. Riley ET, Carvalho B. The Episure syringe: a novel loss of resistance syringe for locating the epidural space. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1164–1166.
    1. Mundey DA, Buckenmaier CC, 3rd, Plunkett AR. Loss of resistance technique for paravertebral nerve blockade using the Episure Autodetect Syringe--a case report. Pain Med. 2009;10:854–857.
    1. Habib AS, George RB, Allen TK, Olufolabi AJ. A pilot study to compare the Episure Autodetect syringe with the glass syringe for identification of the epidural space in parturients. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:541–543.

Source: PubMed

Подписаться