Validation of the Spanish Short Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SSSRQ) through Rasch Analysis

Angélica Garzón Umerenkova, Jesús de la Fuente Arias, José Manuel Martínez-Vicente, Lucía Zapata Sevillano, Mari Carmen Pichardo, Ana Belén García-Berbén, Angélica Garzón Umerenkova, Jesús de la Fuente Arias, José Manuel Martínez-Vicente, Lucía Zapata Sevillano, Mari Carmen Pichardo, Ana Belén García-Berbén

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to psychometrically characterize the Spanish Short Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SSSRQ) through Rasch analysis. Materials and Methods: 831 Spaniard university students (262 men), between 17 and 39 years of age and ranging from the first to the 5th year of studies, completed the SSSRQ questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was carried out in order to establish structural adequacy. Afterward, by means of the Rasch model, a study of each sub scale was conducted to test for dimensionality, fit of the sample questions, functionality of the response categories, reliability and estimation of Differential Item Functioning by gender and course. Results: The four sub-scales comply with the unidimensionality criteria, the questions are in line with the model, the response categories operate properly and the reliability of the sample is acceptable. Nonetheless, the test could benefit from the inclusion of additional items of both high and low difficulty in order to increase construct validity, discrimination and reliability for the respondents. Several items with differences in gender and course were also identified. Discussion: The results evidence the need and adequacy of this complementary psychometric analysis strategy, in relation to the CFA to enhance the instrument.

Keywords: Rasch Model; self-regulation measurement; self-regulation questionnaire; university students; validity.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Dimensions of the Confirmatory Structural Model in the Spanish Short Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SSSRQ) version for this sample.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Wright map of person and items for the Goal Setting subscale.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Wright map of person and items for the Perseverance subscale.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Wright map of person and items for the Decision-Making subscale.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Wright map of person and items for the Learning from mistakes subscale.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Probability curves for the five response categories.

References

    1. Arias B., González V., Sánchez L. (2013). Calibración del índice de hiperactividad de conners mediante el modelo de rasch. Univ. Psychol. 12 957–970. 10.11144/javeriana.upsy12-3.cihc
    1. Bollen K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York, NY: John Wiley & Son.
    1. Bond T. G., Fox C. M. (2012). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, 2nd Edn New York, NY: Routledge; 10.4324/9781410614575
    1. Brown J. M. (1998). “Self-regulation and the addictive behaviors,” in Treating Addictive Behaviors, 2nd Edn, eds Miller W. R., Heather N. (New York, NY: Plenum Press; ), 61–73. 10.1007/978-1-4899-1934-2_5
    1. Brown J. M., Miller W. R., Lawendowski L. A. (1999). “The self-regulation questionnaire,” in Innovations in Clinical Practice: A Source Book Vol. 17 eds Vandecreek L., Jackson T. L. (Sarasota. FL: Professional Resources Press; ), 281–293.
    1. Cañadas-de la Fuente G. A., San Luis C., Lozano L. M., Vargas C., García I., Emilia I. (2014). Evidencia de validez factorial del maslach burnout inventory y estudio de los niveles de burnout en profesionales sanitarios. Rev. Latinoam. Psicol. 46 44–52. 10.1016/s0120-0534(14)70005-6
    1. Carey K. B., Neal D. J., Collins S. E. (2004). A psychometric analysis of the self regulation questionnaire. Addict. Behav. 29 253–260. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.001
    1. Clark N. M., Gong M., Kaciroti N. (2014). A model of self-regulation for control of chronic disease. Health Educ. Behav. 41 499–508. 10.1177/1090198114547701
    1. de la Fuente J., Zapata L., Martínez-Vicente J. M., Sander P., Cardelle-Elawar M. (2015b). The role of personal self-regulation and regulatory teaching to predict motivational-affective variables, achievement and satisfaction: a structural model. Front. Psychol. 6:399 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00399
    1. de la Fuente J., Zapata L., Martínez-Vicente J. M., Sander P., Putwain D. (2015a). “Personal self-regulation, self-regulated learning and coping strategies, in university context with stress,” in Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. A Profile of the Current State-Of-The-Art, ed. Peña-Ayala A. (New York, NY: Springer; ), 223–255.
    1. Gagne P., Hancock G. R. (2006). Measurement model quality, sample size, and solution propriety in confirmatory factor models. Multivariate Behav. Res 41 65–83. 10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_5P
    1. Howell A., Buro K. (2011). Relations among mindfulness, achievement-related self-regulation, and achievement emotions. J. Happiness Stud. 12 1007–1022. 10.1007/s10902-010-9241-7
    1. Karoly P., Boekaerts M., Maes S. (2005). Toward consensus in the psychology of self-regulation: how far have we come? How far do we have yet to travel? Appl. Psychol. 54 300–311. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00211.x
    1. Linacre J. M. (2006). A User’s Guide to Winsteps Ministeps: Rasch-Model Computer Programs. Chicago, IL: Electronic Publication.
    1. Linacre J. M. (2012). Winsteps® Rasch Tutorial 4. Available at:
    1. Paulino I. S., Da Silva A. L. (2016). Contributing to students’ motivation to learn in middle school – a self-regulation approach. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 14 193–225. 10.14204/ejrep.39.15169
    1. Pichardo C., Justicia F., de la Fuente J., Martínez-Vicente J. M., Berbén A. B. (2014). Factor structure of the self-regulation questionnaire (SRQ) at Spanish Universities. Span. J. Psychol. 17 E62 10.1017/sjp.2014.63
    1. Smith E. (2012). Practical Rasch Measurement- Core Topics (Tutorial 3). Available at:
    1. Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
    1. Wright B., Stone M. (1999). Measurement Essentials. Wilmington: Wide Range.
    1. Zimmerman B. (1996). Enhancing student academic and health functioning: a self regulatory perspective. School Psychol. Q. 11 47–66. 10.1037/h0088920

Source: PubMed

Подписаться